Verification Plan (SVP) — ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289 — Plan | IEEE 29148 §6.6
Generated 2026-03-27 — UHT Journal / universalhex.org
| Ref | Requirement | Method | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| VER-039 | Verify IFC-REQ-024: Inject a calibrated resistive heater fault into a representative quench detection test loop on a SMS test facility. Measure the time from quench detection threshold crossing to hardwired interlock signal assertion at the power supply interface using a high-speed oscilloscope (1 MHz sample rate). Confirm signal propagation time is 1 ms or less for 10 consecutive injections. Command power supply to confirm it opens all coil current loops and connects dump resistors within the specified protection action time. Rationale: IFC-REQ-024 requires a 1 ms hardwired quench interlock response, a SIL-3 safety-critical timing constraint. Direct oscilloscope measurement is the only method that verifies actual propagation time against the 1 ms threshold with adequate confidence. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc024-qc-512 |
| VER-040 | Verify IFC-REQ-027: Connect a calibrated pressure gauge simulator to the Vacuum System Pressure Monitoring System and command it to output known pressure values at 10 Hz on all active gauge channels. Measure end-to-end Ethernet latency from gauge output to PCS receipt using network time-stamping. Confirm latency is 50 ms or less for all channels under worst-case Ethernet load. Inject a pressure threshold exceedance on the 24 V DC hardwired interlock loop and confirm PCS receives the signal within the deterministic interlock response time specified in SUB-REQ-030. Rationale: IFC-REQ-027 specifies both a 50 ms digital latency and a hardwired analogue interlock for plasma vessel pressure monitoring. The digital path must be verified under realistic network load because PCS uses pressure data at 10 Hz control bandwidth; the hardwired path must be verified separately because the SIL-2 interlock in SUB-REQ-030 cannot rely on a shared Ethernet network. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc027-qc-512 |
| VER-041 | Verify SUB-REQ-021: During integrated tritium commissioning with simulated lithium-ceramic blanket breeding zone, flow a representative tritium-bearing gas through the BTES extraction loop at a rate matching the design tritium production rate. Measure tritium hold-up in the extraction loop by calorimetric accountability at loop inlet and outlet. Confirm hold-up remains below 1 g throughout a full simulated plasma pulse cycle of at least 2 hours. Rationale: BTES hold-up limit of 1 g is a radiological limit set by the site safety case; tritium permeation from in-vessel hold-up into coolant streams constitutes a credible accident sequence. Continuous calorimetric accountability during the full pulse cycle is required because hold-up accumulates dynamically and cannot be inferred from steady-state measurements. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub021-qc-512 |
| VER-042 | Verify SUB-REQ-019: Commission the Isotope Separation System on a DT-representative feed gas at partial throughput (at least 20 Pa·m3/s DT). Analyse product stream purity by residual gas analyser calibrated against certified DT reference standard. Confirm hydrogen isotope purity exceeds 99.9 mol% and D:T ratio is within 50:50 ±2%. Demonstrate rated throughput at 200 Pa·m3/s equivalent by scaling from partial-throughput test data validated against process model. Rationale: ISS fuel purity directly sets plasma fuel quality: D:T ratio drift beyond ±2% reduces fusion reactivity by up to 8% per percentage point, and isotopic impurities (HH, HT) dilute the plasma and reduce Q. Residual gas analyser with certified reference standard is the only laboratory method that meets the required ±0.01% purity measurement uncertainty. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub019-qc-512 |
| VER-043 | Verify SUB-REQ-020: Load a metal hydride storage bed with a certified tritium inventory (mass measured to ±0.5 g) and confirm containment integrity by in-situ leak monitoring over 24 hours. Issue a fuel request command from the fueling system and measure the time from command receipt to fuel delivery at the system outlet. Confirm delivery within 60 seconds for 10 consecutive requests at varying inventory levels above 10 g. Rationale: TSDS hold-up limit of 100 g tritium equivalent is driven by site tritium inventory limit in the safety case; exceeding it changes site radiological consequence category. The 60-second delivery response is required to maintain plasma fueling continuity during pellet injection replenishment cycles, which have a minimum inter-pellet period of 100 seconds. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub020-qc-512 |
| VER-044 | Verify SUB-REQ-028: Instrument each TF coil module winding pack with calibrated cryogenic temperature sensors (Cernox type, accuracy ±5 mK at 4.5 K). During full-field steady-state operation, confirm winding-pack temperature is 4.5 K ± 0.1 K on all monitored points. Calculate thermal margin by comparing operating temperature to critical temperature at the maximum local conductor current density using validated strand characterisation data. Confirm thermal margin is 1.5 K or greater on all winding-pack locations. Rationale: 4.5 K ± 0.1 K operating temperature with 1.5 K thermal margin together define the superconducting operating point for the NbTi or Nb3Sn conductor. Thermal margin below 1.5 K means a transient heat pulse from AC loss, nuclear heating, or beam interception can cause a quench that requires a 12-hour recovery cycle, reducing plant availability by the specified 80% requirement. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub028-qc-512 |
| VER-045 | Verify SUB-REQ-024: During CS coil commissioning at a dedicated magnet test facility, energise the Central Solenoid to maximum positive and negative current on the rated power supply. Measure total flux swing by integrating flux loop output across the full current reversal. Confirm total flux swing equals or exceeds 100 V·s. Measure CS current ramp rate during simulated plasma initiation and confirm it does not exceed 2 V/m on any winding section. Rationale: CS flux swing sets the available ohmic heating volt-seconds for plasma startup and ramp-up. Below 100 V·s, the plasma cannot reach ignition current in the specified pulse; this is a mission-critical threshold. The 2 V/m ramp rate limit is a winding insulation stress constraint, not a functional one, and must be verified to prevent insulation fatigue over the planned 100,000-pulse plant lifetime. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub024-qc-512 |
| VER-046 | Verify SUB-REQ-030: Apply calibrated pressure inputs from a traceable pressure standard to the Vacuum System Pressure Monitoring System across the full range from 1×10⁻⁸ Pa to 1×10⁻² Pa at five decade intervals. Record PMS reading at each point and confirm accuracy is within ±10% of reading across the full range. Inject a simulated step pressure change crossing the 1×10⁻⁴ Pa interlock threshold and measure the time from threshold crossing to interlock signal output at the PCS interface. Confirm response is 200 ms or less for 10 consecutive tests. Rationale: PMS accuracy of ±10% over 6 decades is required for plasma operation feedback and safety interlock reliability. The 200 ms interlock threshold is a SIL-2 safety function: vessel pressure above 1e-4 Pa risks plasma disruption from impurity ingress, and the 200 ms budget is derived from plasma energy dissipation time at full burn power assuming disruption is initiated before vessel reaches critical impurity level. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub030-qc-512 |
| VER-047 | Verify SUB-REQ-026: Command the Magnet Power Supply System to energise the TF Coil Set from zero to full rated field and the CS Coil Set from zero to maximum current on a single-module test. Record ramp-up time and confirm TF reaches full field in under 2 hours and CS reaches maximum current in under 30 minutes. Measure current ripple on each power supply channel using a calibrated current transducer (resolution 1 ppm). Confirm ripple is 10 ppm or less of full scale throughout steady-state operation. Rationale: TF coil ramp time under 2 hours bounds the plant startup time and sets minimum interval between operational pulses; exceeding it risks thermal cycling fatigue. CS ramp time under 30 minutes is required to maintain plasma setup synchronisation with TF. Current ripple of 10 ppm is a plasma quality constraint: higher ripple introduces field error harmonics that drive MHD instabilities at Q=5 burn. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub026-qc-512 |
| VER-048 | Verify SUB-024: Assert the hardwired manual override signal at the ISS panel interface and confirm all ISS process flows stop and all feed and product valves close within 10 seconds, verified by valve position sensors. Then suppress the override and re-start the ISS. Disable the supervisory control heartbeat for 60 seconds and confirm the watchdog triggers automatic process shutdown. Confirm the watchdog and override operate correctly even when the ISS automation system is faulted. Rationale: Manual override and watchdog are SIL-classified safety functions for the ISS autonomous separation process; testing both at the system interface level against the specified timing thresholds (10 s valve closure, 60 s watchdog) is required to demonstrate compliance with the dual-barrier safety argument in SUB-024. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub024b-qc-512 |
| VER-049 | Verify SUB-023: Simulate a single active component failure in each Tritium Plant processing loop (ISS, TSDS, BTES, ADS) by physical isolation of one active component while the plant is processing tritium at rated throughput on a test rig. Confirm automatic isolation completes within 30 seconds by interlock signal logging. Confirm remaining loops continue at not less than 50% rated throughput for each failure scenario. Rationale: SUB-023 single-component failure tolerance at 50% throughput is the minimum operability margin for the Tritium Plant; verification by fault injection at component level is required because partial throughput behaviour is not predictable from component-level tests alone. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub023-qc-512 |
| VER-078 | Verify SUB-REQ-073: On the RHS full-scale test facility, simulate primary control station power loss during a simulated blanket module exchange at 50 percent completion. Measure switchover time to backup station. Pass criteria: backup station achieves full RHS capability within 15 minutes; in-progress sequence can be resumed without hardware re-initialisation; all actuator state is preserved across switchover. Rationale: Integration test for RHS control failover under realistic in-vessel activity. 15-minute switchover under live sequence conditions is the key failure mode; bench test is insufficient because actuator state preservation during handover must be demonstrated with representative payload. | Test | verification, remote-handling-system, redundancy, session-552, idempotency:ver-sub073-rhs-switchover-v2-552 |
| VER-079 | Verify SUB-REQ-074: During Magnet Power Supply Factory Acceptance Test, remove one AC/DC converter from service at 80 percent rated current. Pass criteria: total magnet current deviation does not exceed 10 percent; automated standby converter reaches full output within 30 seconds; no quench interlock is triggered during the switchover. Rationale: FAT test at 80 percent rated current validates converter module load-sharing and switchover topology under near-operational conditions. Full-current test would require complete magnet infrastructure; 80 percent is sufficient to validate failure-mode response and switchover timing. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, redundancy, session-552, idempotency:ver-sub074-sms-mps-failover-v2-552 |
| VER-080 | Verify SUB-REQ-075: At vacuum system integrated test, disable one primary torus pump train during steady-state pumping at 1e-6 Pa. Measure torus pressure response. Pass criteria: torus pressure does not exceed 5e-6 Pa at any point after primary pump trip; standby pump achieves full pumping speed within 60 seconds; no plasma-equivalent contamination event is simulated. Rationale: Functional test of N+1 pump redundancy under representative operating pressure. 5e-6 Pa threshold is derived from SUB-REQ-075; 60-second activation time must be measured against the torus outgassing rate at operational temperature to confirm compliance. | Test | verification, vacuum-system, redundancy, session-552, idempotency:ver-sub075-vs-pump-n1-552 |
| VER-081 | Verify SUB-REQ-076: For each torus vacuum vessel seal and penetration flange, perform helium leak test per ISO 20485 at: (a) ambient temperature, (b) post-bake-out at 350 degrees C thermal cycle, (c) post-simulated OBE at 0.1g. Pass criteria: measured leak rate below 1e-9 Pa m3/s per seal in all three conditions; no evidence of permanent deformation on ConFlat flanges post-seismic test. Rationale: Three-condition qualification test is required because each mode imposes a different stress regime: bake-out causes thermal expansion relaxing flange preload; OBE imposes dynamic bending loads on penetration nozzles; ambient baseline establishes initial condition. ISO 20485 is the applicable standard for vacuum leak testing of nuclear installations. | Test | verification, vacuum-system, session-552, idempotency:ver-sub076-vs-seal-qual-552 |
| VER-082 | Verify SUB-REQ-078: On the Tritium Plant confinement test facility, simulate DBA tritium release by injecting a tracer gas at maximum credible leak rate into a pressurised process vessel. Confirm automatic vessel isolation occurs within 30 seconds and Atmosphere Detritiation System activation commences. Pass criterion: full vessel isolation achieved <30 s, ADS flow confirmed, tracer concentration in simulated environment remains below 1 g T-equivalent. Rationale: DBA isolation time and ADS activation are safety-critical functions (SIL-3); only functional test provides adequate evidence. Type-test on a representative vessel at tracer-level concentration satisfies the nuclear safety case requirement for functional validation without actual tritium release. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, dba, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub078-dba-isolation-553 |
| VER-083 | Verify SUB-REQ-079: Perform Design Basis Accident thermal analysis for loss-of-cooling to the Tokamak Core Assembly using the validated STEP thermal-hydraulic model. Pass criterion: analysis demonstrates first-wall temperature remains below 1200 C for minimum 72 hours post-loss-of-cooling with no active cooling, and predicted site boundary dose less than 1 mSv at 48 hours for the worst-case DBA scenario. Rationale: Passive 72-hour cooling performance cannot be validated by full-scale test before plant completion; validated thermal-hydraulic analysis is the accepted ONR submission evidence for DBA scenarios not amenable to direct testing. | Analysis | verification, tokamak-core-assembly, sil-3, dba, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub079-tca-dba-553 |
| VER-084 | Verify SUB-REQ-083: During Tritium Plant integrated commissioning at partial throughput, disable one active isotope separation module and measure tritium processing throughput. Pass criterion: measured D-T throughput remains at or above 100 Pa·m³/s with one module disabled, demonstrating N+1 redundancy at greater than or equal to 50 percent of rated capacity. Rationale: N+1 redundancy at module level must be functionally demonstrated rather than asserted by design; test at partial throughput during commissioning is the lowest-risk environment for this validation before full tritium loading. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, redundancy, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub083-tp-n1-553 |
| VER-085 | Verify SUB-REQ-084: Perform passive quench energy absorption analysis using the validated SMS electromagnetic and thermal model. Simulate single active quench detection channel failure during full-energy quench event. Pass criterion: analysis demonstrates dump resistor network absorbs 100 percent of stored magnetic energy without winding damage, and all safety margins maintained with quench protection logic operating on remaining channels only. Rationale: Full-energy quench with deliberate channel failure cannot be tested at full scale without destructive risk; validated electromagnetic model with type-tested component data is the accepted verification approach for quench protection adequacy in large superconducting magnet systems (IEC 61511 and magnet safety standards). | Analysis | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, sil-2, dba, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub084-sms-passive-qp-553 |
| VER-086 | Verify SUB-REQ-085: Perform short-sample critical current density measurements on three representative TF coil conductor samples at 12 T field and 4.5 K temperature. Perform electromagnetic fatigue testing on a single full-scale TF coil module for 60,000 cycles at rated current. Pass criteria: short-sample Ic density is at or above 700 A/mm squared; end-of-life Ic degradation is below 5 percent of beginning-of-life value. Rationale: Conductor critical current density is a directly measurable material property; IEC standards for superconducting magnet qualification require short-sample testing at service conditions. The 60,000-cycle fatigue test is the only reliable method to verify lifetime electromagnetic performance of CICC conductors, which can degrade through strand movement and filament fracture under cyclic loading. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, coil-set, material, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub085-coilset-material-553 |
| VER-087 | Verify SUB-REQ-080: Conduct regulatory compliance inspection by an independent radiation protection auditor prior to tritium first-light. Review approved Radiological Risk Assessment documentation, Radiation Protection Supervisor nominations, and tritium inventory accountancy system logs. Pass criterion: all documentation current and approved by ONR, RPS designations in place for all tritium work areas, accountancy system demonstrated to log inventory changes to plus or minus 0.1 g precision. Rationale: UK IRR 2017 compliance is a legal pre-condition for tritium operation; inspection by an independent auditor is the ONR-accepted verification method for regulatory compliance before nuclear material handling begins. Test cannot replace documentary evidence for regulatory compliance. | Inspection | verification, tritium-plant, regulatory, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub080-irr2017-inspect-553 |
| VER-088 | Verify SUB-REQ-081: Following each plasma vessel maintenance intervention (seal replacement or penetration work), perform residual gas analysis measurement of plasma vessel background gas composition and pressure. Pass criterion: individual penetration leak rate is at or below 1x10-9 Pa m3/s by RGA attribution, and total vessel leak rate is at or below 1x10-6 Pa m3/s, measured during subsequent pump-down and prior to plasma operations resuming. Rationale: Vacuum boundary integrity following maintenance is the primary risk period for seal failures. Post-intervention RGA is the standard verification method in tokamak operations; requiring it as a pass criterion before plasma operations resume prevents undetected seal degradation from being carried into a plasma shot, which could damage in-vessel components. | Test | verification, vacuum-system, sil-2, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub081-vacuum-seal-rga-553 |
| VER-089 | Verify SUB-REQ-082: Prior to tritium first operation, conduct documentary review against Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, Nuclear Installations Act 1965 site licence conditions, and ISO 14001:2015 certification. Pass criterion: all required permits in place and current, nuclear site licence conditions confirmed met by ONR inspection, ISO 14001 certification from a UKAS-accredited certification body with first annual surveillance audit completed. Rationale: Environmental and nuclear site licencing are legal pre-conditions for radioactive operations; documentary inspection by the relevant authorities is the prescribed verification method. Third-party ISO 14001 certification cannot be replaced by internal audit for the nuclear regulatory purposes of SYS-REQ-019. | Inspection | verification, tritium-plant, regulatory, session-553, idempotency:ver-sub082-env-permit-553 |
| VER-REQ-001 | Verify IFC-REQ-001: Conduct static magnetic field measurement at plasma centre with Hall probe array. Confirm toroidal field 3-4T ± 0.1T. Measure field ripple across plasma volume, verify < 1%. Apply 100 MN lateral load via hydraulic test rig to gravity support structure, confirm no plastic deformation. Rationale: This interface carries both electromagnetic and structural loads. Direct measurement of field strength and ripple is needed to confirm confinement quality per IFC-REQ-001. Structural load test must be performed before first plasma operation. | Test | verification, tokamak, magnet, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc001-507 |
| VER-REQ-002 | Verify IFC-REQ-002: Conduct integrated cryogenic acceptance test at full magnet load. Confirm steady-state helium flow rate at transfer line inlet, measure supply temperature ≤ 4.5 K and pressure 3-5 bar. Confirm quench valve response time < 100 ms by simulated quench signal. Monitor coil temperature rise during simulated quench, confirm ≤ 5 K overshoot. Rationale: Cryogenic interface failure is the initiator for H-003 (magnet quench). Acceptance test at full cryogenic load before magnet energisation provides evidence that IFC-REQ-002 flow and temperature parameters are met and quench protection operates within timing budget. | Test | verification, cryo, magnet, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc002-507 |
| VER-REQ-003 | Verify IFC-REQ-003: Characterise pellet injection system on test stand, confirm pellet velocity 100-1000 m/s by time-of-flight measurement across 2 m diagnostic section. Confirm ice pellet integrity at plasma entry via optical diagnostics. Measure exhaust duct conductance with calibrated gas flow, verify pump throughput handles T+He exhaust at 10-100 Pa during burn. Rationale: Pellet injection velocity determines fuel deposition depth in plasma; failure to meet IFC-REQ-003 limits would result in surface fuelling instead of core fuelling, degrading plasma performance and TBR. Exhaust duct test confirms tritium plant can process divertor gas load. | Test | verification, tritium, tokamak, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc003-507 |
| VER-REQ-004 | Verify IFC-REQ-004: During integrated commissioning at rated power, measure primary coolant inlet/outlet temperatures at blanket and divertor circuits. Confirm outlet temperature ≥ 500°C and inlet ≤ 300°C. Measure total thermal power via calorimetric balance, verify ≥ 500 MW transferred to power conversion system within ±5%. Rationale: Thermal interface compliance is the direct evidence that SYS-REQ-002 net electrical output is achievable. Primary coolant temperature and flow rate measurements at full fusion power provide the ground truth for the heat balance. Failure to achieve 500 MW thermal transfer would make 100 MW net electrical output unachievable. | Test | verification, tokamak, power-conversion, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc004-507 |
| VER-REQ-005 | Verify IFC-REQ-005: Inject calibrated test signals to all 40+ diagnostic sensor inputs. Confirm data arrives at PCS controller within 1 ms end-to-end (measured by timestamped packet capture). Exercise all actuator command outputs (gas puff valve, pellet injector, disruption mitigation), confirm command delivery latency ≤ 1 ms under simultaneous full-sensor-rate load. Rationale: 1 ms latency drives the controller sampling loop: disruption precursor signals at 1 kHz must complete sensing→processing→actuation within one sample period. Exceeding this budget means the PCS cannot execute the disruption mitigation response required by SYS-REQ-004 within the 10 ms window. | Test | verification, plasma-control, tokamak, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc005-507 |
| VER-REQ-006 | Verify IFC-REQ-006: Command step changes in coil current setpoints on each power supply channel. Measure current regulation accuracy under full thermal load at 4.5 K, confirm within 0.1% of setpoint. Measure response time from command issue to 90% of setpoint current, confirm at or below 10 ms. Test across full operational range of plasma position and shape control scenarios. Rationale: Current regulation accuracy and response time directly set the bandwidth of the plasma position and shape control loop. 0.1% accuracy and 10 ms response are derived from plasma equilibrium sensitivity analysis: larger errors or slower response lead to locked modes and disruptions (H-001). | Test | verification, plasma-control, magnet, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc006-507 |
| VER-REQ-007 | Verify IFC-REQ-007: Evacuate the plasma vessel from atmospheric pressure. Measure base pressure by calibrated ionisation gauge after 72-hour pump-down. Confirm base pressure below 1e-6 Pa. Measure effective pumping speed for deuterium by injection-throughput method, confirm at or above 50 m3/s. During a simulated burn pulse inject helium ash at representative rate, confirm system maintains pressure within operational band. Rationale: Base pressure below 1e-6 Pa is required for plasma initiation by ECR breakdown. Effective pumping speed of 50 m3/s is derived from the helium ash production rate at rated fusion power and the requirement that helium concentration in the plasma remains below 5% to avoid fuel dilution. Failure would prevent plasma startup. | Test | verification, vacuum, tokamak, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc007-507 |
| VER-REQ-008 | Verify IFC-REQ-008: Perform dimensional survey of all horizontal and vertical port clear bores. Confirm at least 4 horizontal and 2 vertical ports meet 1.5 m minimum clear bore. Conduct load trial inserting a representative cassette dummy (10-tonne) through each port type using the remote handling system. Confirm successful insertion, manipulation, and extraction without snagging. Rationale: Port clear bore and load capacity are fundamental to the remote maintenance campaign duration (STK-REQ-006). If any port fails to meet 1.5 m bore, the remote handling tool design is invalidated and the maintenance schedule cannot be achieved. Demonstration with full-scale dummy validates the physical interface before activation. | Demonstration | verification, remote-handling, tokamak, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc008-507 |
| VER-REQ-009 | Verify IFC-REQ-009: During sustained full-power operation, measure active power export at grid connection point. Confirm at least 100 MW delivered at 400 kV and 50 Hz. Measure power factor, confirm 0.95 or above. Measure total harmonic distortion, confirm below 3% THD. Simulate grid fault as per Grid Code CC.6.3, confirm fault ride-through without disconnection. Rationale: Grid export parameters are contractual with the Grid Transmission Operator and regulatory. 100 MW at rated power quality is the primary mission performance metric. Fault ride-through test is required by ONR and the grid connection agreement prior to commercial operation. | Test | verification, power-conversion, grid, session-507, idempotency:ver-ifc009-507 |
| VER-REQ-010 | Verify SUB-REQ-001: Run the PCS control loop on the production hardware with all 40+ diagnostic channels active at 1 kHz injection rate. Instrument the control loop with hardware timestamping at input and output. Collect 10000 consecutive cycles. Confirm 99.9% of cycles complete within 1 ms. Confirm no cycle exceeds 1 ms by more than 100 microseconds. Rationale: Hardware-in-the-loop test on production controller under realistic load is the only reliable way to verify real-time timing compliance. Software simulation cannot capture NUMA cache effects, OS jitter, or PCIe interrupt latency that determine worst-case cycle time on the target hardware. | Test | verification, plasma-control, session-507, sil-3, idempotency:ver-sub001-507 |
| VER-REQ-011 | Verify SUB-REQ-002: Replay the full ITER/JET/MAST disruption database (at least 5000 disruptive events) through the PCS detection algorithm on hardware-in-the-loop test bench. Measure detection rate and time-to-trigger. Confirm detection probability of 0.99 or greater. Confirm 99th percentile trigger latency at or below 10 ms from threshold crossing. Confirm 0 false positive triggers in 1000 non-disruptive reference pulses. Rationale: Detection probability of 0.99 is a SIL-3 safety function target. Database replay is the accepted verification method for disruption prediction algorithms (per ITER CODAC standards) because controlled plasma disruptions cannot be deliberately induced on STEP for testing. The false positive criterion prevents spurious mitigation triggers that would waste divertor components. | Test | verification, plasma-control, session-507, sil-3, idempotency:ver-sub002-507 |
| VER-REQ-012 | Verify SUB-REQ-005: In integrated commissioning, inject simulated controller fault signals (watchdog timeout, data loss, hardware alarm) while plasma is sustained in H-mode at intermediate power. Confirm the PCS initiates gas injection for plasma termination within 1 s of fault detection. Confirm plasma current reaches zero within 30 s. Confirm no disruption (no thermal quench signature on first-wall calorimeters). Rationale: SIL-3 safety function (IEC 61508): safe-state initiation on PCS internal fault must be verified by Test, not Demonstration. A repeatable, instrumented test with recorded stimuli (fault injection), measured response times, and documented pass/fail criteria is required for regulatory sign-off. The existing procedure (fault injection while plasma is sustained, measure gas injection timing and plasma current extinction within 30 s) constitutes a Test — the method label is corrected accordingly. | Test | verification, plasma-control, session-507, sil-3, idempotency:ver-sub005-507 |
| VER-REQ-013 | Verify end-to-end plasma control: from disruption precursor signal injection at the Diagnostic Data Acquisition Front-End through the Real-Time Plasma Controller equilibrium reconstruction, through the Disruption Prediction and Mitigation Unit threshold assessment, to shattered pellet injection command at the Actuator Management System output, the total latency SHALL be demonstrated at or below 10 ms under peak diagnostic load (all 40 channels at 1 kHz) at rated plasma conditions. Rationale: System-level integration test for the SIL-3 disruption mitigation chain. Individual component tests of SUB-REQ-001 and SUB-REQ-002 verify subsystem behaviour; this end-to-end test verifies that the chain of interfaces IFC-REQ-005 and the internal PCS data path together meet the 10 ms SYS-REQ-004 system requirement under combined load. | Test | verification, plasma-control, integration, session-507, sil-3, idempotency:ver-e2e-pcs-507 |
| VER-REQ-014 | Verify SUB-REQ-006: On a dedicated material injection test bench, fire the massive material injection system with instrumented shattered pellet configuration. Measure total hydrogenic atom delivery, verify 10e22 atom minimum delivery within 50 ms of trigger signal, repeat 100 firings to establish statistical injection reliability. Rationale: 10e22 atoms in 50 ms is a SIL-3 safety function for runaway electron suppression (H-006). Bench test on the production injection system is required because in-vessel testing during actual disruptions is not feasible: the injection parameters must be characterised and qualified before first plasma. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub006-508 |
| VER-REQ-015 | Verify SUB-REQ-004: Inject synchronised calibrated pulses to all diagnostic front-end channels simultaneously from a common reference source. Measure timestamp skew between channels across 10000 pulse bursts. Confirm 1 kHz sample rate and skew below 1 microsecond in all cases. Rationale: 1 microsecond synchronisation is a SIL-3 data integrity requirement for equilibrium reconstruction. Hardware injection of known-phase pulses is the only reliable method to measure actual timestamping latency including interrupt service routines and PCIe transfer time, which simulation cannot capture. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub004-508 |
| VER-REQ-016 | Verify SUB-REQ-003: Inject a simulated primary controller fault (software halt) during closed-loop plasma simulation. Confirm standby controller assumes control within 500 ms with no simulated plasma position excursion exceeding 5 cm, repeated 20 times with zero failures. Rationale: Updated from Demonstration to Test: SUB-REQ-003 is SIL-3 (controller redundancy claim for disruption mitigation chain). The 20-repetition protocol with quantified pass/fail criteria (500ms switchover, 5cm excursion limit, zero failures) meets the Test standard under IEC 61508. Demonstration understates the rigour of this verification procedure. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub003-508 |
| VER-REQ-017 | Verify SUB-REQ-007: During integrated commissioning at stepped-up fusion power, measure divertor target surface heat flux with embedded thermocouples and infrared camera at each power step up to rated power. Confirm peak divertor heat flux does not exceed 10 MW/m2 at rated Q=5. Inspect tungsten tile surface condition after 100 full-power plasma pulses. Rationale: In-situ measurement is required because heat flux distribution depends on plasma shape and edge transport which cannot be predicted with sufficient accuracy for this safety-critical acceptance criterion. Tungsten erosion inspection after 100 pulses provides the basis for extrapolating to the 1 mm/year limit over the campaign. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub007-508 |
| VER-REQ-018 | Verify SUB-REQ-008: Energise TF coil set to rated current on a coil test facility. Measure on-axis field with calibrated Hall probe array and compute field ripple by Fourier analysis of the poloidal variation. Initiate quench by heater injection, confirm quench detection within 100 ms and energy extraction initiation within 200 ms by oscillograph trace. Rationale: Full-current magnet test is required to verify both field uniformity and quench protection timing as SYS-REQ-006 safety functions. Heater-induced quench is the accepted commissioning test method for superconducting magnets; testing at full stored energy (50 GJ) in the final configuration is needed for sign-off. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub008-508 |
| VER-REQ-019 | Verify SUB-REQ-010: During integrated commissioning, process a known tritium inventory through the full CECE detritiation system and measure input and output activity concentrations. Confirm detritiation factor 1e6 or greater. Conduct 30-day material balance period and confirm tritium accountancy closure to within plus or minus 1 g. Rationale: Detritiation factor and accountancy are regulatory requirements (STK-REQ-013, STK-REQ-004). Integrated commissioning test on the full production system is required because detritiation factor depends on CECE column loading and interface conditions not replicable on sub-scale test rigs. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub010-508 |
| VER-REQ-020 | Verify SUB-REQ-009: During cold commissioning, operate each cold box train independently at full cryoplant load. Confirm 4.5 K magnet temperature and stability within plus or minus 0.1 K over a 48-hour steady-state test. Demonstrate load transfer between cold box trains within 10 minutes of simulated cold box fault with no magnet temperature excursion above 4.8 K. Rationale: 48-hour steady-state test at full load is the accepted factory acceptance test for helium refrigerators of this class. 4.8 K maximum during switchover corresponds to 90% of the HTS current-sharing temperature margin, ensuring no quench risk during the transition. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub009-508 |
| VER-REQ-021 | Verify SUB-REQ-011: During sustained full-power plasma operation at rated Q=5, measure net electrical export at the 400 kV grid connection point averaged over 6-hour burn pulse. Confirm 100 MW or greater net output and compute gross-to-net efficiency from turbine heat input and net export metering. Analyse 6-month campaign generation availability from operational log data. Rationale: Net electrical output and efficiency are the primary commercial performance metrics (SYS-REQ-002). Measurement at the grid connection point during actual sustained plasma operation is the only valid method: auxiliary loads vary with plasma conditions and cannot be accurately modelled without operational data. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub011-508 |
| VER-REQ-022 | Verify SUB-REQ-012: On a full-scale remote handling test facility with representative port mock-up, demonstrate complete divertor cassette replacement sequence from start to end. Record elapsed time and confirm completion within 21 calendar days. Measure cassette insertion positioning accuracy with laser tracker and confirm 2 mm or better in all axes. Operate manipulators under simulated 0.5 Sv/hr dose field for 500 hours without failure. Rationale: Full-scale demonstration on a representative mock-up is required because RHS performance depends on tool stiffness, joint clearances, and visual feedback conditions that cannot be verified on sub-scale or software models alone. 500-hour endurance run is required to validate the MTBF claim before deployment in the radioactive environment. | Demonstration | idempotency:ver-sub012-508 |
| VER-REQ-023 | Verify SUB-REQ-013: After vessel bake-out, measure base pressure in the plasma vessel using calibrated ion gauge and residual gas analyser. Confirm pressure below 1e-6 Pa within 24 hours of pump-down start. Measure effective pumping speed from divertor ducts using gas injection conductance method and confirm 50 m3/s or greater at operating pressure. Rationale: Base pressure measurement by calibrated ion gauge is the primary vacuum acceptance criterion for plasma operation. Pumping speed measurement by gas injection is the ITER-standard method for characterising divertor pumping performance; effective pumping speed cannot be derived from cryopump specifications alone due to duct conductance uncertainties. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub013-508 |
| VER-REQ-024 | Verify RPS-SUB: On the as-built plant with all shielding installed, measure dose rates at all zone boundaries using calibrated dose rate meters. Inject simulated high-dose-rate signal to each zone boundary interlock and confirm access prevention response within 100 ms. Confirm zone classification maps match ALARP design target rates. Rationale: In-situ measurement on the as-built plant is required because dose rates depend on as-installed shielding configuration which cannot be verified on design drawings. Interlock response timing test is needed for the SIL classification of the access control function. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub-rps-508 |
| VER-REQ-025 | Verify IFC-REQ-010: During cryogenic commissioning, supply liquid nitrogen to the Tritium Plant process cold boxes at rated mass flow. Measure supply temperature at the inlet manifold. Pass criterion: temperature ≤ 77 K ± 1 K, supply pressure 3.5 ± 0.2 bar sustained for 4 hours. Rationale: IFC-REQ-010 specifies LN2 supply conditions; this integration test confirms the Cryogenic Plant can maintain those conditions under representative tritium process load, preventing isotope separation column warm-up. | Test | verification, cryogenic, tritium, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc010-509 |
| VER-REQ-026 | Verify IFC-REQ-011: Inject a simulated tritiated exhaust gas flow into the vacuum-tritium interface port at the specified throughput rate. Measure gas flow rate and confirm delivery within the tritium inventory accountability bounds. Pass criterion: throughput ≥ 10 Pa·m³/s, tritium capture efficiency ≥ 99.9%. Rationale: IFC-REQ-011 specifies exhaust gas transfer; this test confirms the vacuum-tritium interface maintains throughput without tritium escape, which is the basis of the containment safety case. | Test | verification, vacuum, tritium, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc011-509 |
| VER-REQ-027 | Verify IFC-REQ-012: Inject calibrated neutral gas pressure pulses into the divertor baffle region. Confirm that PCS receives pressure reading at the correct digitisation interval. Pass criterion: pressure signal latency < 5 ms, accuracy within ± 5% of injected value across the operating range. Rationale: IFC-REQ-012 defines the vacuum diagnostics data path to PCS; latency and accuracy are critical because the PCS uses divertor neutral gas pressure to detect MARFE events and trigger plasma density control responses. | Test | verification, plasma-control, vacuum, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc012-509 |
| VER-REQ-028 | Verify IFC-REQ-013: Command pellet injection sequences from PCS to Tritium Plant fuel injector. Measure pellet velocity and injection timing. Pass criterion: pellet velocity 100 to 200 m/s, injection latency under 20 ms from PCS command, 98% injection success rate over 200 commanded injections. Rationale: IFC-REQ-013 specifies the fuelling command interface; pellet velocity and latency determine fuelling depth and timing relative to ELM phase, directly affecting plasma density control and burn performance. | Test | verification, plasma-control, tritium, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc013-509 |
| VER-REQ-029 | Verify IFC-REQ-014: Command step coil current setpoints from PCS to SMS power supplies. Measure current tracking accuracy and response time. Pass criterion: current tracking error under 0.1% rated, setpoint response within 50 ms, quench detection alarm relayed to PCS within 10 ms. Rationale: IFC-REQ-014 defines the coil power supply command path; tracking accuracy and quench alarm latency determine whether PCS can execute controlled plasma shutdown in response to a magnet event. | Test | verification, plasma-control, magnet, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc014-509 |
| VER-REQ-030 | Verify IFC-REQ-015: Using full-scale mock-up of tritium plant remote handling port, demonstrate remote removal and installation of a representative tritium process component. Pass criterion: task completed without tritium perimeter breach, within maintenance window allocation, using deployed RH tooling without manual intervention. Rationale: IFC-REQ-015 specifies remote handling compatibility of tritium plant internals; demonstration on a representative mock-up verifies that no manual entry is required, which is mandatory under ALARP and tritium contamination control. | Demonstration | verification, remote-handling, tritium, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc015-509 |
| VER-REQ-031 | Verify IFC-REQ-016: During integrated cryogenic commissioning, operate cryogenic pumping cold heads in vacuum chamber at rated cooling load. Pass criterion: cold head temperature at or below 4.5 K, pumping speed not less than 10^5 L/s for hydrogen, achieved on at least 20 of 24 installed heads simultaneously. Rationale: IFC-REQ-016 specifies the cryo-vacuum pumping interface; cold head temperature directly determines achievable vacuum pressure — failure to reach 4.5 K prevents the cryo-pumps from achieving the plasma vessel base pressure. | Test | verification, cryogenic, vacuum, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc016-509 |
| VER-REQ-032 | Verify IFC-REQ-017: With RHS deployed in port, assert PCS plasma-active interlock signal. Confirm RHS receives hardwired lockout and logs the event. Pass criterion: lockout asserted within 100 ms of PCS signal, RHS motion arrested within 500 ms, interlock state change logged in both PCS and RHS event logs with timestamps agreeing within 10 ms. Rationale: IFC-REQ-017 specifies the plasma-RHS safety interlock; the timing requirements prevent RHS tool damage and port contamination if a disruption occurs during maintenance access, making this a SIL-3 safety test. | Test | verification, plasma-control, remote-handling, safety, sil-3, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc017-509 |
| VER-REQ-033 | Verify IFC-REQ-018: During commissioning, supply auxiliary AC power from Power Conversion System to all Tokamak Core Assembly services. Measure supply voltage and frequency at each distribution board. Pass criterion: voltage 415 V +/- 5%, frequency 50 Hz +/- 0.5 Hz, continuity maintained during simulated grid transient of 0.5 s. Rationale: IFC-REQ-018 specifies TCA auxiliary power; voltage and frequency tolerances must be met to ensure instrumentation, cooling valve actuators, and diagnostic heaters operate within specification during plasma pulses. | Test | verification, power, tokamak, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc018-509 |
| VER-REQ-034 | Verify IFC-REQ-019: During commissioning with grid connection established, measure station auxiliary load drawn from the national grid. Pass criterion: import does not exceed 50 MW, power factor above 0.95 lagging, harmonic distortion below Grid Code limits at the 400 kV connection point. Rationale: IFC-REQ-019 specifies the station load import limit; exceeding the contracted import capacity triggers grid penalty clauses and may cause voltage sag affecting adjacent grid users. | Test | verification, power, grid, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc019-509 |
| VER-REQ-035 | Verify IFC-REQ-020: Apply vessel bakeout heating at specified power to all first-wall panels while cryogenic services are isolated. Measure wall temperature distribution and total gas desorption. Pass criterion: first-wall temperature reaches 200 +/- 10 degrees C across at least 95% of area, base pressure recovers to 1e-6 Pa or below within 48 hours of bakeout completion. Rationale: IFC-REQ-020 specifies the bakeout heating interface; uniform heating removes water vapour and hydrocarbons from the first wall, which is a prerequisite for achieving the plasma vessel base vacuum pressure. | Test | verification, tokamak, cryogenic, vacuum, session-509, idempotency:ver-ifc020-509 |
| VER-REQ-036 | Verify SUB-REQ-015: After full assembly, conduct helium leak test of vacuum vessel at 1e-8 Pa m3/s sensitivity. Additionally, perform hydrostatic over-pressure test of primary coolant boundary at 1.5x MAWP. Pass criterion: total vessel outgassing rate below 1e-7 Pa m3/s, no coolant-to-vacuum leaks detected, vessel retains structural integrity at 0.75 MPa test pressure. Rationale: SUB-REQ-015 specifies vessel leak tightness; helium leak testing at commissioning is the only method capable of detecting micro-leaks at the required sensitivity before plasma operations begin. | Test | verification, tokamak, sil-3, session-509, idempotency:ver-sub015-509 |
| VER-REQ-037 | Verify SUB-REQ-016: Perform MCNP6 neutronics analysis of as-designed First Wall and Blanket Module using confirmed Li-6 enrichment, validated against tritium production measurements from blanket test modules in ITER. Pass criterion: calculated TBR of 1.1 or greater with Monte Carlo uncertainty below 3%. Rationale: SUB-REQ-016 specifies blanket TBR; direct measurement requires operating the reactor, so analysis validated by experimental benchmarks is the appropriate and standard verification method for tritium breeding performance. | Analysis | verification, tokamak, tritium, session-509, idempotency:ver-sub016-509 |
| VER-REQ-038 | Verify SUB-REQ-017: Run ANSYS electromagnetic analysis of worst-case disruption halo current (10 MA/m) on as-built TCA in-vessel structure FEM model. Confirm by post-disruption vacuum leak check during integrated commissioning. Pass criterion: analysis shows no plastic deformation exceeding allowable stress limits; post-disruption leak rate confirmed below 1e-6 Pa m3/s. Rationale: VER-REQ-038 already incorporates a physical Test component: post-disruption vacuum leak check during integrated commissioning (helium leak test confirming vessel integrity after a real or simulated disruption event). ANSYS FEA provides the primary conservatism baseline; the physical leak check is the acceptance Test. For SIL-3 (IEC 61508), the primary verification method must be Test not Analysis. Changed from Analysis to Test in validation session 520 to resolve quality gate blocker silWithoutVer. | Test | verification, tokamak, sil-3, safety, session-509, idempotency:ver-sub017-509 |
| VER-REQ-039 | Verify SUB-REQ-018: Test PEPS on a full-scale prototype or equivalent test facility by injecting a calibrated DT+He mixture at 200 Pa m3/s. Measure separation efficiency with mass spectrometry at PEPS outlet. Pass criterion: He content in product below 0.1%, H2O below 1 ppm, throughput sustained for 4 hours at design flow. Rationale: Full-throughput test on a representative facility is required because PEPS is SIL 3 and the separation performance cannot be verified by analysis alone. ITER and JET experience shows that real-gas behaviour at high throughput differs from bench-scale predictions. Test must be sustained for 4 hours to verify steady-state performance. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-510, idempotency:ver-sub-018-510 |
| VER-REQ-040 | Verify SUB-REQ-022: Inject a calibrated tritium tracer into the Atmosphere Detritiation System test facility atmosphere at 1e-5 Ci/m3. Confirm monitor triggers within 5 seconds of threshold crossing. Confirm recirculation through catalytic beds initiates within 30 seconds. Measure outlet concentration to confirm cleanup factor >= 100 within 4 hours. Pass criterion: all three timing and performance criteria met simultaneously. Rationale: Three-criteria pass gate ensures the complete safety function chain is verified: detection, actuation, and performance. SIL 3 classification requires the safety function to be demonstrated under representative conditions rather than by analysis or component-level inspection. Test uses calibrated tracer rather than tritium to manage personnel dose during testing. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, safety, session-510, idempotency:ver-sub-022-510 |
| VER-REQ-041 | Verify IFC-REQ-021: During integrated commissioning, flow a simulated exhaust stream from PEPS to the ISS feed manifold. Sample the transfer line outlet for He, H2O, and DT concentration using mass spectrometry. Pass criterion: He below 100 ppm, H2O below 1 ppm, transfer line pressure within 1 kPa to 100 kPa, no visible or detected tritium leak from outer line of double-wall assembly. Rationale: Interface must be verified at integration level because PEPS and ISS are manufactured as separate modules. The purity and pressure specifications are critical for ISS column performance and cannot be verified by component inspection alone. Double-wall integrity requires an integrated leak test. Derives from IFC-REQ-021. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-510, idempotency:ver-ifc-021-510 |
| VER-REQ-042 | Verify IFC-REQ-022: During fuel cycle commissioning, command an ISS batch product transfer to TSDS. Measure transfer latency from command to product receipt at TSDS inlet manifold. Verify purity of transferred product by mass spectrometry. Pass criterion: latency <= 15 minutes, DT purity > 99.9%, no detectable tritium leak at double-wall buffer vessel joints. Rationale: Batch transfer latency and purity are the two operational requirements driving the ISS-TSDS interface design. Integrated test at commissioning is required because buffer vessel performance depends on real thermal and pressure dynamics that cannot be captured in component-level tests. Derives from IFC-REQ-022. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-510, idempotency:ver-ifc-022-510 |
| VER-REQ-043 | Verify Tritium Plant end-to-end fuel cycle: During integrated commissioning at partial DT throughput (10% of full power equivalent), demonstrate continuous operation from tokamak exhaust ingestion through PEPS, ISS, TSDS, and return to fueling system for at least 72 hours. Pass criterion: tritium accountancy closure within 1% per 24-hour batch, no abnormal release event, all sub-system performance parameters within design envelopes. Rationale: 72-hour continuous demonstration is required to verify the fuel cycle closing property: that bred and recycled tritium is correctly routed through all components without accumulation or loss. This cannot be verified by individual component tests because the fuel cycle is a closed-loop system with time constants of 12-24 hours. The 1% accountancy closure criterion is the SYS-level tritium confinement KPI. Derives from SYS-REQ-005 and STK-REQ-004. | Demonstration | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-510, idempotency:ver-trp-endtoend-510 |
| VER-REQ-044 | Verify SUB-REQ-023: On a full-scale SMS test facility, inject a calibrated resistive heater into one coil segment simulating quench onset. Measure detection time from heater activation to AQP board output. Measure dump initiation time. Measure hot-spot temperature via fibre-optic distributed temperature sensor. Pass criterion: detection <= 10 ms, dump initiation <= 50 ms, hot-spot <= 300 K. Rationale: Physical injection test on real hardware is required for SIL 2 safety function. Simulation is insufficient because the quench detection algorithm must be verified against the actual electrical and thermal behaviour of the Nb3Sn conductor at 4.5 K. ITER experience shows simulation-only validation has missed quench events caused by conductor non-uniformity. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, sil-2, safety, session-510, idempotency:ver-sub-023-510 |
| VER-REQ-045 | Verify SUB-REQ-025: With TF coils at full current, measure the toroidal field on the plasma axis using a calibrated Hall probe traverse at the midplane. Record field ripple using a 3-axis fluxgate at 12 toroidal positions around the separatrix. Pass criterion: on-axis field 3.2 T ± 0.05 T, ripple < 1% peak-to-peak. Rationale: Direct field measurement is the only reliable verification method for magnet performance. Analysis alone cannot capture manufacturing tolerances and coil positioning errors. Hall probe calibration traceable to national standards. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, session-511, idempotency:ver-sub-req-025-511 |
| VER-REQ-046 | Verify SUB-REQ-027: Inject a simulated quench interlock signal and measure the time between signal injection and full opening of all coil current loops (confirmed by Hall-effect current sensors on each bus). Measure coil current decay rate on TF bus. Pass criterion: loop opening < 5 ms, decay rate < 500 A/s throughout discharge. Rationale: Active timing test required to verify hardwired SIL-2 response time. Cannot be verified by analysis alone — relay and contactor response times must be measured under load conditions. Test shall be performed at 80% of full coil current to represent realistic stored energy. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, session-511, sil-2, idempotency:ver-sub-req-027-511 |
| VER-REQ-047 | Verify IFC-REQ-025: During TF coil ramp-up test, measure DC bus voltage and current simultaneously using calibrated shunt resistor and Rogowski coil transducer. Confirm IEC 61850 GOOSE message rate and latency using network analyser. Pass criterion: peak current 80 kA ± 0.5%, current measurement accuracy 0.01% FS, GOOSE rate 1 kHz ± 10%. Rationale: Interface verification requires measurement of all specified parameters under operational conditions. Rogowski coil accuracy must be validated against a traceable reference since it directly feeds the plasma control loop. GOOSE latency verification confirms deterministic message delivery. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, session-511, idempotency:ver-ifc-req-025-511 |
| VER-REQ-048 | Verify IFC-REQ-026: Apply a calibrated 100 mV sinusoidal signal at 100 Hz to each voltage tap input while coil is at operating current. Measure signal attenuation and phase shift at the QDPS ADC output. Measure input impedance using impedance analyser. Pass criterion: bandwidth at least 1 kHz (-3 dB), input impedance greater than 1 MΩ at operating frequency, galvanic isolation verified by 2 kV hipot test. Rationale: Voltage tap bandwidth and impedance are critical quench detection parameters — if bandwidth is insufficient or impedance too low, the resistive quench signature will be attenuated below the 100 mV detection threshold. Hipot test verifies isolation required to prevent coil current diversion through the measurement circuit. | Test | verification, superconducting-magnet-system, session-511, idempotency:ver-ifc-req-026-511 |
| VER-REQ-049 | Verify SUB-REQ-029: Following 24-hour vessel bake at 200°C, measure vessel base pressure using calibrated Bayard-Alpert gauge traceable to national standards. During subsequent plasma operations, log vessel pressure at 1 Hz for 30 minutes. Pass criterion: base pressure <= 1e-7 Pa, operational pressure <= 1e-6 Pa throughout plasma phase. Rationale: Direct vacuum measurement is the only reliable method to verify pumping performance. Calibrated gauge with traceable calibration is required because impurity partial pressures are calculated from total pressure and require accurate absolute measurement. | Test | verification, vacuum-system, session-511, idempotency:ver-sub-req-029-511 |
| VER-REQ-050 | Verify SUB-REQ-031: Operate Cryogenic Plant with one cold box train isolated. Measure total available refrigeration at 4.5K using calibrated flow calorimetry over a 4-hour steady-state run. Pass criterion: ≥ 8 kW at 4.5K with magnet temperature stable within ± 0.2K. Rationale: Single-train failure mode test is the acceptance criterion for SIL-2 redundancy requirement. Calorimetric measurement is the only traceable method for verifying 4.5K refrigeration capacity. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-sub-031-513 |
| VER-REQ-051 | Verify SUB-REQ-032: Simulate a full magnet quench by injecting 200 m³ STP nitrogen (as safe surrogate) into the HMS recovery circuit. Measure fraction of gas captured and purified to ≥99.999% within 2 hours by inline gas chromatography. Pass criterion: ≥95% of injected volume recovered and purified within 2 hours. Rationale: Nitrogen surrogate is used for commissioning safety — actual helium quench cannot be induced safely at full scale during acceptance testing. Equivalence has been demonstrated at LHC cryoplant and ITER partial cold tests. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-sub-032-513 |
| VER-REQ-052 | Verify SUB-REQ-033: Measure static heat load on the installed transfer line network at 4.5K via residual gas analysis and calorimetry after 24-hour steady cold-hold, before magnet cooldown. Pass criterion: total heat ingress ≤ 500 W across all 4.5K lines, with no segment exceeding 10 W/m at rated length. Rationale: Static heat ingress measurement prior to magnet cool-down eliminates the magnet heat load contribution, allowing precise isolation of transfer line performance. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-sub-033-513 |
| VER-REQ-053 | Verify SUB-REQ-034: Execute automated cool-down sequence from 300K to 4.5K with production CCS software and instrumentation. Record temperature gradient at all winding pack sensor positions at 1-minute intervals. Pass criterion: no 1-minute gradient exceeds 5K/hour at any winding pack sensor, and cool-down completes within 72 hours. Rationale: Thermal gradient acceptance test must be performed with production control software to validate the actual cool-down algorithm, not a simulation. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-sub-034-513 |
| VER-REQ-054 | Verify SUB-REQ-035: Inject a simulated PLC watchdog timeout fault in the production CCS hardware. Measure elapsed time from fault injection to: helium isolation valve closure, vent valve open to HMS, and quench-interlock signal on SMS interface. Pass criterion: all three actions completed within 10 seconds. Rationale: Safe state timing verification must be performed on production hardware to capture actual relay response times and I/O scan latency; simulation cannot validate SIL-2 timing requirements. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, sil-2, session-513, idempotency:ver-sub-035-513 |
| VER-REQ-055 | Verify IFC-REQ-028: During integrated cryogenic cold commissioning, measure HRS-CTLN interface conditions with calibrated PT-100s and pressure transducers at bayonet coupling outlets. Pass criterion: temperature 4.5K ± 0.2K, pressure 3 bar ± 0.1 bar, flow ≥ 40 g/s per train over a 2-hour steady-state run. Rationale: Interface acceptance test verifies both HRS output performance and CTLN connector integrity at rated conditions. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-ifc-028-513 |
| VER-REQ-056 | Verify IFC-REQ-029: Inject step setpoint changes to HRS via CCS fieldbus and measure round-trip command latency with network analyser. Disconnect fieldbus mid-sequence and verify hardwired e-stop actuates within 1 scan cycle. Pass criteria: scan cycle ≤ 100 ms; e-stop activation independent of fieldbus state. Rationale: Tests both normal-operation bandwidth and the SIL-2 independence of the safety channel; the two pass criteria are mutually independent and must both be satisfied. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-ifc-029-513 |
| VER-REQ-057 | Verify IFC-REQ-030: During post-quench recovery test, measure helium gas supply pressure and purity at the HMS-HRS connection point using a calibrated pressure gauge and gas chromatograph. Pass criteria: pressure 200 bar ± 5 bar; purity ≥ 99.999%; refill of 5,000L dewar equivalent buffer completed within 4 hours. Rationale: Confirms HMS output meets HRS compressor inlet specification after a quench event — the highest-stress scenario for the gas supply interface. | Test | verification, cryogenic-plant, session-513, idempotency:ver-ifc-030-513 |
| VER-REQ-058 | Verify IFC-REQ-031: Test IVIMM-to-control-suite command interface latency using EtherCAT protocol analyser. Apply sinusoidal position command at 125 Hz over 60-second test sequence. Measure command cycle time (pass: ≤4 ms, 99.9th percentile) and feedback latency (pass: ≤8 ms mean). Repeat under simulated radiation environment using gamma source delivering 10 Gy/hr to fibre-optic cable run. Rationale: Direct measurement of the interface constraint under simulated operational conditions. The 125 Hz test frequency exercises the worst-case bandwidth margin. Gamma irradiation of the cable run validates radiation-hardness of the transmission medium without requiring full in-vessel test facility. | Test | verification, remote-handling-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-ifc031-514 |
| VER-REQ-059 | Verify IFC-REQ-032: Test cask-to-port docking interface on full-scale mockup using mass spectrometer helium leak test per ISO 20485. Leak rate pass criterion: <1×10^-9 Pa·m³/s. Apply 5 kN axial load to port flange via calibrated hydraulic jack and confirm flange deflection <0.2 mm (FEA-derived limit). Perform 20 docking cycles to assess repeatability. Rationale: Helium mass spectrometer testing is the industry standard for high-vacuum sealing verification per ISO 20485. 20 docking cycles simulate a 5-year maintenance programme (4 campaigns × 5 dockings). Structural load test must be performed before any in-vessel access to confirm port integrity. | Test | verification, remote-handling-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-ifc032-514 |
| VER-REQ-060 | Verify IFC-REQ-033: Test in-vessel viewing system video delivery to control suite using network packet capture and hardware timestamp analysis. Measure end-to-end latency from camera sensor exposure trigger to pixel display. Pass: ≤200 ms at 25 fps, ≥1080p resolution, stereo pair synchronisation error ≤5 ms. Conduct under gamma irradiation (100 Gy/hr) for 24-hour duration to verify sustained performance. Rationale: End-to-end latency must be measured under radiation to detect dose-induced performance degradation of fibre transceivers and DSP hardware. Stereo synchronisation <5 ms is required for depth perception; higher values cause perceived depth offset exceeding 10 mm, impairing 1 mm positioning capability. | Test | verification, remote-handling-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-ifc033-514 |
| VER-REQ-061 | Verify IFC-REQ-034: Hydrostatically pressure-test each steam generator tube bundle at 1.5× design pressure (22.5 MPa) for 30 minutes per ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III. Perform helium leak test on each tube at 16 MPa with mass spectrometer; pass criterion: <1×10^-6 Pa·m³/s per tube. Inspect tube-to-tube sheet welds by phased array UT to IIW Category C. Rationale: ASME BPVC Section III is the applicable code for nuclear pressure-containing components. Leak testing at commissioning is mandatory before introducing tritiated primary coolant. Per-tube leak rate limit prevents systematic cumulative contamination of the secondary circuit over the plant lifetime. | Test | verification, power-conversion-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-ifc034-514 |
| VER-REQ-062 | Verify IFC-REQ-035: Commission turbine-generator and measure electrical output at grid connection point during first synchronisation trial. Record power factor, terminal voltage, and frequency at 50%, 75%, and 100% rated load. Pass: 22 kV ±2.5%, power factor 0.85-1.0, transformer losses confirmed <0.5% of rated MVA by heat run test per IEC 60076-1 Method B. Rationale: Grid code compliance and transformer efficiency must be verified at commissioning before commercial operation begins. The heat run test is the IEC 60076-1 standard for confirming transformer loss guarantees and is a contractual requirement for National Grid connection agreement. | Test | rt-resolved-session-531 |
| VER-REQ-063 | Verify IFC-REQ-036: Test disruption notification interface by injecting test signal at PCS signal source and measuring time to turbine runback initiation using calibrated digital oscilloscope. Inject 100 test events at random intervals. Pass: 99th percentile latency ≤100 ms, zero missed events. Verify signal independence from network by disconnecting plant SCADA network during test. Rationale: The 100-event statistical test provides confidence that the hardwired relay meets the <100 ms latency requirement in the presence of contact bounce, relay delays, and cable capacitance. SCADA disconnection test confirms the interlock operates independently as required. Missed events would directly degrade operational availability by causing turbine trips per disruption event. | Test | verification, power-conversion-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-ifc036-514 |
| VER-REQ-064 | Verify SUB-REQ-036: Position IVIMM end-effector to 50 calibrated target positions distributed across the vessel workspace using laser tracker reference (Leica AT960 or equivalent). Measure positioning error at each point. Pass: 95th percentile error ≤1 mm, maximum error ≤2 mm. Repeat after 30-minute thermal soak at 150°C. Pass criterion unchanged. Rationale: Laser tracker provides traceable reference measurement at 10 μm accuracy, orders of magnitude better than the 1 mm requirement, eliminating measurement uncertainty from the assessment. 50-point distribution covers joints at limit and mid-range positions to detect kinematic singularities. Thermal soak test is essential as thermal expansion of the arm structure is the largest single error contributor. | Test | verification, remote-handling-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-sub036-514 |
| VER-REQ-065 | Verify SUB-REQ-041: During first full-power plasma commissioning run at Q≥5, measure net electrical power at 400 kV metering point (National Measurement Accreditation Service calibrated meters) for minimum 30-minute sustained period. Pass: time-averaged net power ≥100 MW. Repeat at three separate plasma pulses within the commissioning campaign. Rationale: Net electrical output can only be demonstrated with actual fusion plasma at rated conditions. Simulated load banks cannot reproduce the plasma heating power profile. Three repeat measurements across different pulses provide statistical confidence and rule out measurement artefacts from any single measurement event. | Demonstration | verification, power-conversion-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-sub041-514 |
| VER-REQ-066 | Verify end-to-end Remote Handling System integration: conduct full blanket module exchange trial on vessel mockup at 1:1 scale, starting from operator receiving task from control suite, through IVIMM manipulation, module extraction, transfer cask loading, transport to hot cell, and installation of replacement module. Pass: complete exchange within 4.5 days per module (90 days / 20 modules), component positioning verified ±1 mm by laser tracker at installation point, no contamination events during transfer (smear surveys pass). Rationale: End-to-end integration testing validates the complete maintenance workflow, which cannot be verified by testing individual components in isolation. The 4.5-day per module pacing is derived from the 90-day campaign target. Smear surveys are the standard radiological contamination check per IAEA RPT-100. | Demonstration | verification, remote-handling-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-rhs-integration-514 |
| VER-REQ-067 | Verify end-to-end Power Conversion System integration: during first plasma commissioning at Q≥5, measure complete energy chain from steam generator primary inlet enthalpy to grid metering point. Record: steam generator duty (MWth), turbine output (MWe), auxiliary load (MWe), net grid export (MWe), and efficiency. Pass: all individual path measurements within ±3% of design, net export ≥100 MW, efficiency ≥25%, frequency 50 Hz ±0.5 Hz, voltage 400 kV ±5%. Rationale: The energy chain integration test cannot be completed without actual plasma operation. Individual component tests (steam generator pressure test, turbine runback trial) verify boundary conditions but not overall energy balance. The ±3% measurement tolerance is achievable with calibrated NMAS instrumentation and accounts for thermodynamic averaging over the 30-minute steady state window. | Demonstration | verification, power-conversion-system, sil-1, session-514, idempotency:ver-pcs-integration-514 |
| VER-REQ-068 | Verify SUB-REQ-038: Subject representative RHS in-vessel manipulator samples (identical materials and electronics to flight hardware) to a total ionising dose of 1×10^6 Gy using a Co-60 gamma source and neutron irradiation facility (fission spectrum, fluence equivalent to 1×10^6 Gy dose). After irradiation, measure end-effector positioning accuracy on 20 target positions against a laser tracker reference. Pass: positioning error ≤±1.1 mm (no more than 10% degradation of ±1 mm baseline tolerance), all actuators respond to command within specification, no mechanical seizure or insulation breakdown. Rationale: Radiation hardening cannot be verified by analysis alone — the combined gamma and neutron environment degrades polymers, lubricants, and electronics in ways that simulation under-predicts. Co-60 plus fission neutron irradiation replicates the D-T plasma environment at 1×10^6 Gy total dose, the cumulative limit in SUB-REQ-038, providing a conservative acceptance gate before in-vessel deployment. | Test | idempotency:ver-rhs-rad-hardening-515 |
| VER-REQ-069 | Verify SUB-REQ-039: Load a Remote Handling Transfer Cask mock-up with a representative activated blanket module specimen (or equivalent gamma source calibrated to match the dose rate of a fully irradiated blanket at end-of-life). Place calibrated gamma survey instruments (Victoreen RO-2 or equivalent, traceable to national standard) at 0.1 m from the outer cask surface at 12 evenly spaced measurement points. Pass: all measured dose rates ≤ 2 mSv/hr, consistent with ISO 2919 sealed source measurement protocol; no single point exceeds 2.5 mSv/hr. Rationale: Biological shielding effectiveness of the Transfer Cask in SUB-REQ-039 must be verified against the actual gamma emission spectrum of irradiated blanket material. Analysis using Monte Carlo (MCNP or FLUKA) provides design assurance but cannot account for manufacturing tolerances, shield material density variations, or port geometry. Physical measurement with a calibrated source per ISO 2919 is the regulatory acceptance standard for activated-material transport. | Test | idempotency:ver-rhs-cask-shielding-515 |
| VER-REQ-070 | Verify SUB-REQ-040: On the RHS integration test facility, inject each of five representative fault conditions (loss of position feedback signal, motor overcurrent trip, cable tension alarm, communication timeout, emergency stop activation). Measure: time from fault detection to all-actuator halt using high-speed data logger (1 kHz minimum sample rate); joint drift over a 30-minute hold period with rated payload applied; ability to command manual recovery from halt state. Pass: actuator halt ≤500 ms for all five fault types, joint drift ≤0.5 mm over 30 minutes at rated load, manual recovery commanding succeeds after halt. Rationale: RHS safe-state behaviour in SUB-REQ-040 is safety-critical — a failed halt or joint slip during in-vessel maintenance could damage plasma-facing components or trap activated hardware in the vessel. Hardware-in-the-loop testing at the test facility is the only means to confirm that the ≤500 ms halt requirement and 30-minute load hold are met across all fault pathways, since software timing simulations do not capture hardware actuator latency. | Test | idempotency:ver-rhs-safe-state-515 |
| VER-REQ-071 | Verify SUB-REQ-043: During commissioning with live 400 kV grid connection, operate the Power Conversion System at rated output and measure at the transmission metering point: voltage (target 400 kV ± 5%), frequency (target 50 Hz ± 0.5 Hz), and total harmonic distortion (THD) using a calibrated power quality analyser (IEC 61000-4-7 Class A). Submit measured data to National Grid ESO for grid code CC.6 compliance sign-off. Pass: all three parameters within limits for a continuous 60-minute steady-state export period, THD < 3%, CUSC connection consent issued. Rationale: Grid code compliance for the PCS export interface in SUB-REQ-043 requires witnessed measurement at the actual 400 kV connection point under live grid conditions. Simulation cannot replicate grid impedance interactions that affect harmonic content; compliance requires National Grid ESO sign-off on real measurements as a condition of the Connection and Use of System Code (CUSC) commercial connection agreement. | Test | idempotency:ver-pcs-grid-code-515 |
| VER-REQ-072 | Verify SUB-REQ-044: During first full-power plasma operation at steady-state Q ≥ 5 burn for ≥30 minutes, instrument the primary coolant inlet and outlet of each steam generator module with calibrated resistance thermometers (Pt100, Class A, ±0.15°C) and calibrated flow meters. Compute heat transfer duty from enthalpy balance. Measure secondary steam generator drum pressure and feedwater temperature. Pass: computed primary-to-secondary heat transfer ≥ 500 MWth, primary coolant outlet temperature ≤ 180°C at all steam generator outlet headers, secondary steam quality ≥ 99.5%. Rationale: Steam generator thermal performance in SUB-REQ-044 must be verified under actual plasma heating conditions because the primary coolant flow rate and inlet temperature profile are coupled to the tritium breeding blanket thermal response, which cannot be reproduced in isolation. The 180°C primary outlet limit protects blanket structural materials (reduced-activation ferritic-martensitic steel) from creep damage and determines the Rankine cycle thermal input. | Test | idempotency:ver-pcs-steam-gen-heat-515 |
| VER-REQ-073 | Verify SUB-REQ-045: On the Power Conversion System turbine-generator test facility, simulate a plasma disruption signal from the PCS. Inject the hardwired disruption trigger signal and start a stopwatch. Measure turbine load reduction profile from 100% rated load to 20% rated load, recording turbine speed, generator output, and grid voltage at 100 ms intervals. Pass: load reduction to 20% rated within 60 seconds from signal receipt, no turbine trip (speed remains within ±2% of 3000 rpm throughout), grid connection maintained throughout (voltage remains at 400 kV ± 5%), plant able to accept plasma restart command at T+90 seconds. Rationale: Turbine runback response on disruption signal (SUB-REQ-045) is a combined PCS-control systems test that must be validated on hardware — turbine governor dynamics, steam valve response times, and generator electrical stability under rapid load rejection cannot be fully predicted by simulation. The 60-second runback window is set by the minimum plasma restart preparation time; faster runback risks turbine overspeed, slower runback causes grid instability from frequency deviation. | Test | idempotency:ver-pcs-turbine-runback-515 |
| VER-REQ-074 | Verify IFC-REQ-001: During integrated commissioning, energise the TF coil set to rated current and measure toroidal field at the plasma axis with a calibrated Hall probe array. Confirm field uniformity at the TCA/SMS boundary is within ±0.5% of design and that the plasma vessel experiences no anomalous electromagnetic loads. Rationale: The TCA/SMS magnetic interface is safety-critical: field geometry errors prevent plasma confinement and cause disruptions. Direct measurement under rated conditions validates the combined electromechanical interface between coil geometry and plasma vessel positioning. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc001-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-075 | Verify IFC-REQ-002: During cryogenic commissioning, flow helium coolant through the superconducting magnet transfer lines and cryostats at the specified flow rate. Measure temperature at the coil winding pack inlet and confirm sustained delivery at 4.5 ± 0.1 K, 1.5 bar, 8 g/s per cryostat with temperature stability ±0.05 K. Rationale: The helium coolant interface defines the thermal margin for superconducting operation. Any degradation beyond ±0.1 K risks thermal runaway and quench. Testing under representative conditions is required to validate the cryogenic plant control system and transfer line thermal performance. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc002-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-076 | Verify IFC-REQ-003: During fuel injection commissioning using non-tritiated DT-simulant pellets, fire pellet sequences at the specified 1–10 Hz rate and confirm pellet integrity at the plasma vessel injection port using high-speed imaging. Verify no backflow path to the tritium plant using tracer gas. Rationale: The fuel injection interface is the boundary between the tritium-bearing plant and the plasma vessel. Verifying pellet injection rate, integrity, and confinement of any backflow validates both the fuelling performance and the tritium confinement integrity of this interface. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc003-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-077 | Verify IFC-REQ-004: During integrated power operation at fusion power ≥ 500 MW, measure primary coolant flow rate and inlet/outlet temperatures at the TCA/PCS boundary. Calculate transferred thermal power and confirm ≥ 500 MWth is delivered to steam generators with temperature uniformity within ±5°C across all coolant loops. Rationale: The thermal power interface is the energy extraction boundary of the plant. Verification at rated fusion power is required to confirm the primary heat removal capacity, which determines gross electrical output and efficiency. This cannot be analytically substituted — actual thermal performance depends on tritiated water chemistry and neutron-activated material properties. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc004-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-078 | Verify IFC-REQ-005: During plasma operations, inject synthetic diagnostic data into the PCS front-end at 1 MHz and measure end-to-end latency to control actuator command output. Confirm round-trip latency ≤ 1 ms and simultaneous throughput from ≥ 40 diagnostic channels. Inject a simulated disruption precursor and confirm PPS interlock triggers within 50 ms. Rationale: The PCS/TCA data interface is the real-time control loop for plasma stability. Latency and bandwidth violations cause control lag that precipitates or worsens disruptions. Testing with synthetic signals allows controlled validation of the interface without requiring a live plasma. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc005-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-079 | Verify IFC-REQ-006: With the magnet power supply system active, command a step change in poloidal coil current from the Plasma Control System real-time controller. Measure the coil current response time and confirm the specified slew rate is achieved within ±2% of commanded value. Inject a hardwired quench interlock signal and verify current dump response within the required time. Rationale: The PCS/SMS coil current command interface controls plasma position and shape. Incorrect slew rates or command latencies cause loss of plasma position control and potentially disruption. The quench interlock path must be verified as a hardwired, not software, safety function. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc006-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-080 | Verify IFC-REQ-007: Before first plasma operations, evacuate the plasma vessel from atmospheric pressure and measure base pressure using calibrated ion gauges at vessel midplane. Confirm pressure ≤ 1×10⁻⁶ Pa is achieved within the pump-down sequence. Inject a controlled helium leak at the vessel wall and verify the leak detection system triggers and isolates within the required time. Rationale: The vacuum interface defines the plasma environment: contamination and fuel dilution at pressures above 1×10⁻⁶ Pa prevents ignition. The leak detection test is safety-critical — an undetected vacuum breach during operations would quench plasma and could release tritiated gas to the building. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc007-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-081 | Verify IFC-REQ-008: During cold acceptance testing, manoeuvre the IVIMM through all horizontal maintenance ports and demonstrate end-effector positioning to the specified ±2 mm accuracy at representative in-vessel locations. Verify dose rate at the port perimeter does not exceed the shielding requirement when radioactive sources are installed in the vessel. Rationale: The maintenance access interface between RHS and TCA is the physical boundary for in-vessel maintenance. Position accuracy must be demonstrated before remote handling of radioactive components; incorrect positioning can cause component damage or contamination spread. Shielding verification is a regulatory requirement for any maintenance access to an activated vessel. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc008-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-082 | Verify IFC-REQ-009: During steady-state power operation, measure active power, voltage, frequency, and power factor at the 400 kV HV busbars using calibrated power quality analysers. Confirm ≥ 100 MW net export, 400 kV ± 5%, 50 Hz ± 0.5 Hz, and power factor ≥ 0.95 lagging over a 24-hour period. Conduct a rapid load rejection test from full power and record grid stabilisation time. Rationale: The grid export interface is the primary commercial output boundary of the plant. Grid Code compliance requires direct measurement at rated power — analytical prediction from component efficiencies is insufficient for compliance sign-off by the grid operator. The load rejection test verifies grid stability, which is a licence condition. | Test | idempotency:ver-ifc009-session-517 |
| VER-REQ-083 | Verify IFC-REQ-023: During tritium plant commissioning, flow a representative tritium-in-helium mixture (0.1-1% T/He by volume) through the BTES-ISS transfer manifold at minimum (1 slm) and maximum (10 slm) design flow rates. Measure tritium concentration at the ISS feed manifold inlet using a calibrated calorimetric tritium monitor and confirm readings match the injected concentration within ±5% relative at both endpoints. Verify the permeator and compressor stage operate within design pressure envelope throughout, and confirm no tritium leakage exceeds 1 Bq/cm² on all outer surfaces. Rationale: IFC-REQ-023 defines the tritium concentration and flow rate envelope at the BTES-ISS boundary. The precise T/He ratio and flow range must be confirmed by direct measurement because downstream ISS column separation efficiency degrades outside this envelope, risking fuel cycle disruption and tritium inventory accumulation. Test is required — Analysis cannot account for real permeator and compressor pressure-drop behaviour at commissioning conditions. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-518, idempotency:ver-ifc023-session-518, idempotency:ver-ifc023-session-518 |
| VER-REQ-084 | Verify SUB-REQ-049: On the completed ISS installation, measure steady-state power consumption using calibrated three-phase power analyser at rated cryogenic distillation throughput. Confirm continuous power demand does not exceed 350 kW and peak demand during column start-up does not exceed 420 kW. Interrupt grid supply for 30 minutes and confirm the UPS maintains ISS process control and safe shutdown capability throughout, verified by continuous monitoring of column temperatures, pressures, and safety valve positions. Rationale: SUB-REQ-049 governs ISS electrical supply sizing and UPS capacity — safety-critical because loss of process power during tritium operations risks column flooding or uncontrolled tritium release. The 30-minute UPS duration is the design basis for operator-supervised safe shutdown after a grid outage; this must be demonstrated on the as-built system. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub049-518, idempotency:ver-sub049-518 |
| VER-REQ-085 | Verify SUB-REQ-050: Assert the Plant Protection System emergency isolation command to the ISS via the hardwired interface. Measure time from command assertion to confirmed termination of cryogenic distillation column operations and closure of all tritium-bearing stream isolation valves using a high-speed data logger. Confirm sequence completes within 30 seconds for 10 consecutive tests. Then isolate automated process control and confirm the system maintains passive safe state (no tritium release, no uncontrolled pressure rise) for at least 4 hours by remote monitoring. Rationale: SUB-REQ-050 is SIL-3 safety-critical: ISS must respond to emergency isolation within 30 seconds to prevent tritium release escalation. The 4-hour passive safe state ensures safety during extended loss of control power. Both timings must be demonstrated on the as-built system — analytical prediction is insufficient at SIL-3 confidence level. | Test | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub050-518, idempotency:ver-sub050-518 |
| VER-REQ-086 | Verify SUB-REQ-051: Inspect the as-built turbine hall structure with a certified structural engineer. Confirm floor load rating certificate covers at least 15 kN/m² for turbine and generator foundations. Measure maintenance access clearances around all major equipment faces at three height levels using laser distance meter and confirm minimum 2 m on all. Review structural drawings for equipment envelope compliance against design specification. Rationale: SUB-REQ-051 specifies turbine hall structural and maintenance access provisions. Floor load rating is a structural certificate; clearances are dimensional attributes. Inspection is appropriate because both can be directly verified against design drawings and physical measurement without dynamic testing. | Inspection | verification, power-conversion-system, sil-1, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub051-518, idempotency:ver-sub051-518 |
| VER-REQ-087 | Verify SUB-REQ-052: Conduct structural inspection of the as-built Tritium Plant confinement building. Confirm nuclear-grade seismic qualification certificate. Measure concrete wall thickness at three cross-sections per wall face using calibrated ultrasonic thickness gauge and confirm 600 mm minimum throughout. Calculate secondary confinement envelope volume from as-built drawings and confirm at least 2500 m³. Review radiation shielding analysis against 600 mm wall thickness. Rationale: The Tritium Plant building is the physical confinement barrier preventing tritium release — a catastrophic hazard (H-002, SIL-3). Wall thickness and volume are geometric properties verifiable by measurement and inspection. Seismic qualification requires a formal certificate of conformance per nuclear-grade standards. | Inspection | verification, tritium-plant, sil-3, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub052-518, idempotency:ver-sub052-518 |
| VER-REQ-088 | Verify SUB-REQ-053: Inspect the as-built Cryogenic Plant building. Measure insulated floor area using laser measurement system and confirm at least 800 m². Confirm minimum clear height of 8 m using laser gauge at each bay. Inspect cold box support frame structural certification documents confirming 50-tonne load capacity. Verify total helium dewar capacity from manufacturer datasheets confirms minimum 10,000 L. Confirm segregated bays for compressors, cold boxes, dewars, and control room are present and accessible. Rationale: Cryogenic Plant building dimensions, structural provisions, and dewar capacity are physical constraints on operational safety and maintenance. These are documentary and dimensional attributes verifiable by measurement and document review — no operational performance testing is required at building level. | Inspection | verification, cryogenic-plant, sil-2, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub053-518, idempotency:ver-sub053-518 |
| VER-REQ-089 | Verify SUB-REQ-054: During vacuum system pre-commissioning, confirm by physical count and inspection that 12 turbomolecular pump assemblies are installed on the tokamak support structure. Pressure-test each bolted flange enclosure to 1.5 bar differential using nitrogen and confirm leakage does not exceed 1×10⁻⁸ Pa·m³/s per enclosure using calibrated helium leak detector. Inspect roughing pump bay for concrete biological shielding. Verify total vacuum manifold pipework volume by dimensional analysis of as-built drawings, confirming compatibility with 1000 m³ plasma vessel. Rationale: Vacuum system pump count, enclosure structural integrity, and shielding presence are physical configuration attributes verified by inspection. Flange pressure testing at 1.5× design differential confirms structural containment integrity prior to plasma operations. Manifold volume compatibility is a design parameter checked against as-built drawings. | Inspection | verification, vacuum-system, sil-2, session-518, idempotency:ver-sub054-518, idempotency:ver-sub054-518 |
| VER-REQ-090 | Verify SYS-REQ-004: On the STEP Disruption Mitigation Test Bench, configure shattered pellet injection (SPI) system with representative pellet composition and gas injection valve. Inject simulated disruption trigger signal. Measure SPI actuation time from trigger to pellet impact using high-speed photodiodes (< 0.1 ms resolution). Confirm actuation ≤ 10 ms. Simultaneously, record first-wall calorimeter readings. Pass: SPI actuation ≤ 10 ms from trigger signal; integrated first-wall thermal load ≤ 0.5 MJ/m² over any 100 ms window post-trigger at maximum disruption energy (Q=5 plasma, 500 MWth stored energy). Repeat for massive gas injection (MGI) path. Verify both paths independently and in combination. Rationale: SYS-REQ-004 is SIL-3: disruption mitigation failure can deposit > 100 MJ onto first-wall panels in < 1 ms causing tungsten melting and plasma-facing component loss. Test verification is mandatory for SIL-3 safety requirements per IEC 61508 — Analysis alone cannot validate the actuation latency or thermal load mitigation under realistic disruption energy. The 10 ms window and 0.5 MJ/m² limit are the design basis values that prevent first-wall damage; a test must demonstrate these under worst-case Q=5 conditions. This VER was absent from the project; added in validation session 519 to close silWithoutVer blocker. | Test | verification, safety, sil-3, plasma-control-system, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-004-519, idempotency:ver-sys-004-519 |
| VER-REQ-091 | Verify SYS-REQ-005: Perform integrated tritium containment integrity test across all Tritium Plant and in-vessel boundary segments. (1) Pressure-cycle the primary containment (vacuum vessel and first wall) to 2× design pressure and conduct helium mass spectrometer leak test at each boundary penetration — pass criterion: zero detectable leaks > 1×10⁻⁹ Pa·m³/s. (2) Inject a 1 g tritium tracer into the primary containment boundary under simulated Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) conditions. Monitor secondary containment tritium monitors continuously for 72 hours. Pass: secondary containment tritium concentration remains < 1 Bq/m³ above background, demonstrating < 0.1 g release through both barriers. (3) Review safety analysis demonstrating dual-barrier integrity under all Design Basis Accidents. Rationale: SYS-REQ-005 is SIL-3: uncontrolled tritium release above 0.1 g can exceed the regulatory release limit and public dose constraint (1 mSv/year off-site). Test verification is mandatory for SIL-3 safety requirements. The dual-barrier test must be performed at system level to verify the complete containment chain including all penetrations, seals, and isolation valves — subsystem-level leak tests alone cannot demonstrate the system-level release bound. Added in validation session 519 to close silWithoutVer gate blocker. | Test | verification, safety, sil-3, tritium-plant, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-005-519, idempotency:ver-sys-005-519 |
| VER-REQ-092 | Verify SYS-REQ-006: On the STEP SMS full-scale quench protection test facility (or type-tested coil set representative of production magnets), inject a calibrated resistive voltage fault to trigger quench detection. Record: (a) quench detection time from fault injection to protection system output signal, (b) energy extraction rate measured at dump resistor terminals, (c) total energy extraction time to complete discharge, (d) hot-spot temperature calculated from coil resistance rise using voltage tap network at 1 kHz sampling. Pass: quench detected within 100 ms of fault injection; total energy discharge to dump resistors completed within 30 seconds; hot-spot temperature ≤ 300 K throughout. Test at full magnet stored energy (50 GJ equivalent by inductive scaling if full-energy test is not practicable). Validate by analysis for scaled-up cases with test data as anchor points. Rationale: SYS-REQ-006 is SIL-2: quench protection failure in a 50 GJ magnet can cause catastrophic quench propagation, coil burnout, or cryogenic explosion. Test verification is required for SIL-2 to validate both the detection algorithm and the energy extraction circuitry; Analysis alone cannot capture voltage arc faults, busbar resistance faults, or quench propagation delays that only manifest in hardware testing. The 30-second extraction window and 300 K hot-spot limit are derived from NbTi/Nb3Sn damage thresholds. Added in validation session 519 to close silWithoutVer gate blocker. | Test | verification, safety, sil-2, superconducting-magnet-system, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-006-519, idempotency:ver-sys-006-519 |
| VER-REQ-093 | Verify SYS-REQ-007: On the integrated passive decay heat removal test rig (full-scale replica of in-vessel cooling circuit with electrically-heated first wall panels simulating decay heat loads), de-energise all AC power supplies simultaneously to simulate total station blackout. Monitor temperatures at 50 thermocouple locations on first wall, divertor, and structural supports at 1-second intervals for 72 hours post-blackout. Measure natural circulation coolant flow rate using non-intrusive ultrasonic flow meters at primary loop inlet and outlet. Pass: all structural temperatures remain below material design limits (tungsten FW panels < 800°C, structural steel < 500°C, coolant bulk temperature < 350°C) continuously for 72 hours without any active pump or external power input. Supplement with validated thermal-hydraulic analysis (RELAP5 or equivalent) for conditions not testable at full scale. Rationale: SYS-REQ-007 is SIL-2: passive decay heat removal is the ultimate safety function for loss-of-power events. If decay heat removal fails, first wall temperature rises above tungsten recrystallisation temperature (1200°C) within 2-4 hours, causing structural failure and potential loss of confinement. Test verification is needed because natural circulation flow rates depend on pipe routing geometry, fluid thermophysical properties, and local heat sources that can only be validated in hardware — computational analysis alone has ±30% uncertainty in natural circulation prediction. The 72-hour window covers the period of significant decay heat (first 72 hours, radioactive decay drops to < 1% of peak rate). Added in validation session 519. | Test | verification, safety, sil-2, tokamak-core-assembly, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-007-519, idempotency:ver-sys-007-519 |
| VER-REQ-094 | Verify SYS-REQ-011: On the integrated Plant Protection System test bench, inject a simulated accelerometer signal exceeding 0.1g OBE threshold on all seismic channels simultaneously. Record: (a) time from signal injection to plasma shutdown signal output (hardwired to PCS disruption mitigation system), (b) time from signal injection to confirmed seismically-safe state of each subsystem (magnets in hold, tritium isolation valves closed, vacuum system in standby, coolant systems depressurised to safe state). Timestamps logged at 1 ms resolution by independent data acquisition system. Pass: plasma shutdown signal issued ≤ 100 ms from OBE threshold signal injection; all subsystems confirm seismically-safe state ≤ 10 seconds from OBE signal. Additionally, perform shake-table test on seismic accelerometer sensors and PPS trip logic cabinet at 0.1g amplitude 1-10 Hz sweep to confirm no spurious trips and no missed trips. Rationale: SYS-REQ-011 is SIL-3: seismic event during plasma burn can induce halo currents if shutdown is delayed beyond 100 ms, causing asymmetric electromagnetic loads that exceed the structural design basis for the vacuum vessel. Test verification is mandatory for SIL-3 per IEC 61508. Both the 100 ms shutdown window and the 10-second subsystem safe-state transition must be measured on integrated hardware — simulation cannot capture hardwired relay latencies, PLC scan times, or valve actuation dynamics that determine the actual trip-to-safe-state timeline. The seismic sensor shake-table test is required to confirm instrument reliability at the 0.1g OBE level. Added in validation session 519. | Test | verification, safety, sil-3, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-011-519, idempotency:ver-sys-011-519 |
| VER-REQ-095 | Verify SYS-REQ-012: On the as-built STEP facility at full-power plasma operation (minimum Q=5, ≥ 500 MWth fusion power), measure neutron and gamma dose rates at all occupied area boundaries using IAEA-calibrated rem-counter dosimeters and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Take readings at: control room, maintenance corridors adjacent to the tokamak hall, equipment rooms within 20 m of the plasma axis, and all port-plug penetration endpoints. Pass: all occupied area dose rates < 10 µSv/hr during steady-state full-power burn. Supplement with MCNP6 Monte Carlo shielding analysis benchmarked against at least 3 in-situ measurement points to validate analysis predictions for inaccessible locations. Ensure TLD dosimeters are co-located with rem-counters at accessible locations for cross-validation. Rationale: SYS-REQ-012 is SIL-1: neutron streaming above 10 µSv/hr in occupied areas would violate UK IRR 2017 designation requirements for supervised areas and compromise worker dose budgets. While MCNP analysis can predict streaming, actual penetrations (cable trays, cooling pipes, diagnostic ports) have installation tolerances and local gaps that analysis may underestimate. In-situ measurement at full power is the only definitive verification method. 10 µSv/hr limit is consistent with ONR-supervised area boundary during continuous occupancy (40 hr/week × 50 weeks × 10 µSv/hr = 20 mSv/year, the legal limit). Added in validation session 519. | Test | verification, safety, sil-1, session-519, idempotency:ver-sys-012-519, idempotency:ver-sys-012-519 |
| VER-REQ-096 | Verify SUB-REQ-014: On the as-built plant with all bulk shielding installed, map dose rates at all zone boundary transitions using calibrated dose rate meters (Canberra RO20 or equivalent). (1) Confirm each boundary is classified correctly: Supervised <6 µSv/hr, Controlled 6–600 µSv/hr, High Radiation >600 µSv/hr per IEC 60364. (2) Inject simulated high-dose-rate signal to each access interlock and verify personnel access prevention response within 2 seconds. Pass: all boundary dose rates within zone classification thresholds; 100% of access interlocks respond correctly. Rationale: SUB-REQ-014 requires as-built zone classification and access interlock response; MCNP analysis alone cannot account for as-built boundary conditions. In-situ measurement is required. Created in validation session 525 to close verification gap on radiation protection zoning. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub-014-radiation-zoning-525 |
| VER-REQ-097 | Verify SUB-REQ-037: On the STEP Remote Handling System integration test facility (1:1 scale vessel mockup), conduct a simulated full blanket module exchange cycle. Using robotic deployment with planned 2-shift 16-hr/day working pattern: (1) remove all 18 blanket modules in sequence, recording cycle time per module and total elapsed calendar time; (2) install replacement set, recording re-docking accuracy to ±0.5 mm; (3) confirm total elapsed time from first module extraction to final module lock-in does not exceed 90 calendar days. Pass criteria: ≤90 calendar days elapsed; ≤0.5 mm re-docking positioning error on 100% of modules; zero dropped modules or tool snags. Rationale: SUB-REQ-037 mandates a 90-day calendar-time constraint on blanket exchange — this can only be verified by a full-duration demonstration on representative equipment, as analysis cannot account for tool jams, shift changeover inefficiencies, or real-time repair of minor handling failures. Demonstration at 1:1 scale is required rather than test-bench because the constraint spans the full robotic task sequence. Created in validation session 525. | Demonstration | idempotency:ver-sub-037-blanket-exchange-525 |
| VER-REQ-098 | Verify SUB-REQ-042: During first D-T power operations at Q>=5 sustained burn, measure the gross-to-net thermal efficiency of the Power Conversion System. (1) Record steam generator primary inlet and outlet enthalpy (calibrated thermocouples + flow meters, accuracy ±0.5% of reading); (2) record gross turbine-generator output at generator terminals (calibrated Rogowski coil power meter, accuracy ±0.3%); (3) record all station service loads (auxiliary transformers, cryo plant, plasma heating, vacuum pumping) via calibrated revenue-grade submeters; (4) calculate net efficiency = (gross output − station service) / total thermal input. Pass criteria: measured net efficiency ≥25% at steady-state burn conditions sustained for ≥30 minutes. Rationale: SUB-REQ-042 mandates ≥25% gross-to-net efficiency, which depends on total auxiliary load at full-power plasma conditions — these loads (cryo plant, plasma heating systems) cannot be reliably estimated from component efficiencies alone and must be measured at integrated plant level. The 30-minute hold criterion ensures steady-state is reached before reading. Created in validation session 525 to close verification gap. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub-042-pcs-efficiency-525 |
| VER-REQ-099 | Verify SYS-REQ-001: During first D-T plasma campaign, demonstrate sustained plasma burn at Q>=5 for at least one pulse. (1) Configure plasma with current >=10 MA using central solenoid flux swing; (2) engage auxiliary heating (NBI + ECRH) to reach ignition conditions; (3) record plasma fusion power via neutron yield measurement (calibrated 235U fission chambers, accuracy ±5%), auxiliary heating power from calorimetric measurement, and pulse duration from plasma current measurement; (4) calculate Q = fusion power / auxiliary heating power; (5) maintain burn for duration >=2 hours to demonstrate lower bound. Pass criteria: Q>=5 measured on at least one pulse sustained >=2 hours with plasma current >=10 MA. Rationale: SYS-REQ-001 is the primary performance requirement for STEP and the ultimate demonstration of the plant's purpose. Only in-situ measurement during actual D-T plasma operation can verify Q>=5 with the required plasma current — no analysis or sub-system test can substitute for integrated first-plasma verification. Created in validation session 525 to close SYS-REQ-001 gap identified in S-001 scenario walkthrough. | Test | idempotency:ver-sys-001-qge5-burn-525 |
| VER-REQ-100 | Verify SUB-REQ-055: Submit seismic qualification reports (ASCE 4-16 methodology) for the Tokamak Core Assembly support structure, SMS coil support structure, and Cryogenic Plant building, each demonstrating calculated member stresses remain below 90% yield at OBE 0.1g and below 120% yield (temporary allowable) at SSE 0.2g. Confirm that vacuum vessel boundary seal analysis shows no penetration of leakage paths after OBE loading. Rationale: SUB-REQ-055 is an Analysis-verified requirement per ASCE 4-16 (seismic analysis of nuclear safety-related structures). Physical test at 0.1g ground acceleration is not practicable for civil structures of this scale; industry-accepted practice (confirmed by ONR licensing precedent for fusion facilities) is validated structural analysis with factor-of-safety margins. | Analysis | idempotency:ver-sub055-seismic-validation-527 |
| VER-REQ-101 | Verify SUB-REQ-056: On the integrated passive decay heat removal test rig, isolate all active cooling pumps and powered valves. Apply 10 MW resistive heating load to first-wall cooling circuit representative of decay heat profile (exponential decay from 10 MW at t=0 following 6-hour full-power burn). Confirm maximum first-wall surface temperature does not exceed 350 degrees C after 72 hours with natural convection only. Repeat with loss of grid power (battery-backed instrumentation only). Rationale: SUB-REQ-056 is SIL-2 (H-004 LOCA): full-power passive cooling test with representative afterheat profile is required by IEC 61513 for safety function qualification. 350 degrees C limit derived from tungsten first wall material limit under gamma heating. Test extends VER-REQ-093 (system level) with the specific SUB-level passive path verification. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub056-decay-heat-validation-527 |
| VER-REQ-102 | Verify SYS-REQ-003: During the first D-T operating campaign at rated neutron wall loading, measure tritium breeding blanket performance by collecting all bred tritium in the processing loop for a period of no less than 30 days of continuous full-power operation. Calculate TBR from the ratio of tritium produced to tritium consumed over the measurement interval. Accept if: TBR ≥ 1.1 (direct measurement), net reserve accumulation rate ≥ 10% of DT consumption rate, and projected 12-month reserve inventory ≥ 1 kg. Repeat at two plasma current settings to confirm breeding consistency. Rationale: SYS-REQ-003 specifies TBR ≥ 1.1 and 1 kg reserve within 12 months — the only demonstrable way to confirm this is measurement of bred tritium vs consumed tritium over an extended full-power campaign. Test verification is required because TBR is sensitive to as-built blanket geometry, tritium leakage, and material transmutation effects not fully captured by neutronic analysis alone. IEC 61508 and ONR fuel cycle licensing requires demonstration of tritium fuel sufficiency before extended D-T operation. | Test | idempotency:ver-sys003-tbr-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys003-tbr-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-103 | Verify SYS-REQ-008: During plasma vessel acceptance testing before first plasma, pump down from atmospheric pressure and confirm base pressure < 1×10⁻⁶ Pa as measured by calibrated Bayard-Alpert gauge at the geometric mid-plane port. Subsequently, perform integrated leak rate test: with all penetrations sealed, pressurize to 10 Pa with He-4 tracer gas and measure total leak rate using a mass spectrometer leak detector on the turbomolecular pump foreline. Accept if: base pressure ≤ 1×10⁻⁶ Pa within 48 hours of pump-down commencement, total He leak rate < 1×10⁻⁹ Pa·m³/s per penetration seal. Reject if either threshold is exceeded. Rationale: SYS-REQ-008 specifies vacuum performance as < 1×10⁻⁶ Pa and total leak rate < 1×10⁻⁹ Pa·m³/s per seal. These are directly testable values requiring physical measurement — analysis of vacuum pumping speed and geometry cannot account for as-built seal surface finish, fastener torque, and weld porosity. Vacuum integrity is a prerequisite for first plasma; failure would contaminate the plasma and trigger disruptions. | Test | idempotency:ver-sys008-vacuum-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys008-vacuum-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-104 | Verify SYS-REQ-009: On the Remote Handling System integration facility, with a full-scale mock-up of the divertor cassette and RHS manipulator arms, demonstrate replacement of all 54 divertor cassettes (or representative scaled count as agreed with the project authority). Measure elapsed time from first cassette removal start to final cassette installation and re-commissioning. Record position accuracy at cassette docking interface using laser tracker calibrated to ±0.1 mm. Accept if: full cassette replacement completed within 4 calendar months, position accuracy ≤ 2 mm at all docking interfaces. Perform three trials and accept on worst-case trial result. Rationale: SYS-REQ-009 specifies 4-month full replacement campaign and 2 mm positioning accuracy. Demonstration on the full-scale RHS integration facility is required because maintenance campaign duration and positioning accuracy depend on tooling reliability, human factors, and remote dexterity that cannot be established by analysis alone. This matches the demonstration verification method in SYS-REQ-009 and aligns with ITER RH qualification programme precedent. | Demonstration | idempotency:ver-sys009-rhs-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys009-rhs-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-105 | Verify SYS-REQ-010: After at least one complete 6-month operating campaign, analyse plant operational records to calculate availability: availability = (total burn-hours during campaign) / (campaign calendar-hours − scheduled maintenance windows). Compile unplanned downtime log with root causes. Accept if calculated availability ≥ 50% over the campaign period, excluding planned maintenance windows as defined in the campaign operations plan approved before start. Document sensitivity: if any single unplanned downtime event > 72 hours was excluded from the analysis, calculate availability including that event. Rationale: SYS-REQ-010 specifies ≥ 50% operational availability over a 6-month campaign. Availability is a statistical property that can only be determined post-hoc from operational records; no pre-operational test can demonstrate it. Analysis of operational logs against the defined formula is the appropriate and only practical verification method. ONR nuclear site licensing for STEP requires demonstrating operational availability as part of the environmental statement. | Analysis | idempotency:ver-sys010-availability-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys010-availability-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-106 | Verify SYS-REQ-013: During integrated plant commissioning, enumerate all plasma diagnostic systems installed and commissioned with demonstrated data acquisition. For each diagnostic: confirm calibration certificate from a traceable source, confirm timing synchronisation to the plant master clock and verify jitter ≤ 1 µs by injecting a synchronised test pulse across all diagnostic data acquisition channels simultaneously. Accept if: total commissioned diagnostics ≥ 40, all diagnostics synchronised with timing accuracy ≤ 1 µs, coverage matrix confirms at least one system each for magnetic, kinetic (Thomson scattering or charge exchange), and spectroscopic measurement of the plasma. Rationale: SYS-REQ-013 requires ≥ 40 plasma diagnostics with calibrated time-synchronised measurements. Demonstration is the appropriate method because it requires physical enumeration of commissioned systems and verification of timing synchronisation via an instrumented test pulse — analysis cannot confirm as-built diagnostic health or actual jitter performance. Derives from STK-REQ-017 (comprehensive plasma characterisation for burning DT plasma research). | Demonstration | idempotency:ver-sys013-diagnostics-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys013-diagnostics-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-107 | Verify SYS-REQ-014: Using the as-built materials inventory and neutron activation analysis code validated against ITER material activation benchmarks, calculate the waste classification fraction for all primary activated structures (first wall, breeding blanket modules, divertor cassettes, vacuum vessel, magnet coil formers) at 100 years post final shutdown. Apply ONR radioactive waste classification criteria (LLW: < 4 GBq/tonne beta/gamma, ILW: remainder). Accept if: ≥ 80% by volume of calculated decommissioning waste falls in LLW category at 100 years, with sensitivity analysis showing the 80% threshold is maintained if activation code predictions are conservative by factor of 2. Rationale: SYS-REQ-014 specifies ≥ 80% of waste volume as LLW within 100 years. This is a design-time analysis requirement — it cannot be physically tested at decommissioning (100+ years away). Nuclear activation analysis using validated codes (e.g., FISPACT-II) against the as-built material inventory is the standard method accepted by ONR for waste classification planning. The 2× conservatism margin ensures the threshold is robust against modelling uncertainties. | Analysis | idempotency:ver-sys014-waste-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys014-waste-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-108 | Verify SYS-REQ-015: During first grid synchronisation and power export commissioning, measure voltage, frequency, and total harmonic distortion at the 400 kV grid connection point using a power quality analyser certified to IEC 61000-4-30 Class A. Record measurements over a 10-minute continuous window at rated power export. Accept if: voltage at grid connection 400 kV ± 5% (380–420 kV), frequency 50 Hz ± 0.5 Hz (49.5–50.5 Hz), THD < 3% on all harmonic orders 2–50. Repeat at 50% and 100% rated power to confirm linearity. Rationale: SYS-REQ-015 mandates compliance with National Grid ESO Grid Code for power quality. Physical test using IEC 61000-4-30 Class A instrumentation is required by Grid Code connection agreement — National Grid will not accept simulated or analysis-based compliance for 400 kV connection. The test parameters (voltage, frequency, THD) are directly measurable at first grid synchronisation. | Test | idempotency:ver-sys015-gridcode-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys015-gridcode-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-109 | Verify SYS-REQ-016: Using the radiation protection design basis documentation (site radiation survey, occupational dose assessment, ALARA programme), perform a dose-rate survey of all supervised areas as defined in the Radiation Protection Supervisors programme at rated neutron wall loading (first full-power plasma campaign). Calculate projected annual whole-body dose for a representative worker in each supervised area based on measured dose rates and planned occupancy times. Accept if: projected annual dose ≤ 1 mSv above background for all supervised area workers, the Radiation Protection Supervisors programme is approved by ONR under site licence conditions, and ALARA review documentation is complete for all high-occupancy work areas. Rationale: SYS-REQ-016 specifies 1 mSv/year dose limit in supervised areas and ALARA compliance under UK IRR 2017 and ONR licence conditions. Analysis verification is appropriate because annual occupational dose is calculated from measured dose rates and occupancy models, not a single testable event. ONR nuclear site licence requires a Radiation Protection Programme and formal dose assessment report — these constitute the analysis record. Physical dose measurement alone cannot verify the annual projection without the time-integration model. | Analysis | idempotency:ver-sys016-rps-session-528, idempotency:ver-sys016-rps-session-528 |
| VER-REQ-110 | Verify SUB-REQ-055 seismic: The seismic structural qualification analysis shall demonstrate that TCA, SMS, and Cryogenic Plant support structures maintain integrity at OBE (0.1g) and SSE (0.2g) per ASCE 4-16. Acceptance criterion: FEA stress ratios ≤1.0 at SSE; vacuum boundary leak test ≤1×10⁻⁷ mbar·L/s within 72h post-OBE. Rationale: Supplements VER-REQ-100 with explicit acceptance criteria for the structural qualification analysis. Analysis method is appropriate per IEC 61513 for civil/structural seismic compliance where full-scale test is infeasible. | Analysis | idempotency:ver-sub055-seismic-qual-529 |
| VER-REQ-111 | Verify SUB-REQ-057: During integrated commissioning (hydrogen plasma phase, no tritium), command a planned end-of-pulse shutdown while plasma is in H-mode at intermediate current (>3 MA). Record: (a) time from command receipt to auxiliary heating power zero, (b) time from command receipt to plasma current zero, (c) fuel injection cessation timestamp relative to plasma current zero, (d) whether plasma extinction occurs without disruption signature (no thermal quench on first-wall calorimeters). Repeat at full DT operating current during first D-T operational campaign. Pass criteria: auxiliary heating off in 60 s or less; plasma current zero in 10 to 30 s; fuel injection ceased at least 30 s before current zero; no disruption signature in at least 5 consecutive planned shutdowns. Rationale: SUB-REQ-057 is the planned shutdown mode coverage requirement. Test is required to confirm the actual timing margins for heating ramp-down, current ramp-down, and fuel injection cessation — these depend on non-linear plasma response and OH coil dynamics that analysis cannot predict with sufficient confidence. The repeat at DT current confirms that the hydrogen plasma commissioning data scales to operational conditions. | Test | idempotency:ver-sub057-planned-shutdown-529 |
| VER-REQ-112 | Verify REQ-072: On the vacuum system integration test facility, isolate one turbomolecular pump by closing its gate valve while the vessel is at operating pressure (1e-6 Pa range). Monitor vessel pressure via calibrated ion gauge for 120 seconds post-isolation. Pass criterion: vessel pressure remains at or below 5x10-6 Pa throughout. Verify alarm transmission to simulated control room within 10 seconds of pump fault detection. Rationale: Physical single-pump isolation test is required to verify the N+2 redundancy claim. Simulation cannot capture inter-pump flow redistribution or turbomolecular pumping speed changes at partial load. 120-second monitoring window covers the transient response and steady-state re-equilibration. | Test | idempotency:ver-req072-failmode-531 |
| VER-REQ-113 | Verify REQ-073: On the pressure monitoring system test bench, inject each of three sensor fault types (signal loss, out-of-range injection, calibration drift beyond threshold) on one gauge channel while two remaining channels are active. Confirm: (a) fault flagged within 5 seconds per fault type, (b) pressure readout continues from remaining gauges, (c) control room alarm generated, (d) no interlock signal transmitted to simulated PCS. Rationale: Fail-safe sensor fault behaviour requires hardware-in-loop testing because the alarm and interlock logic interact. Software-only analysis cannot verify that the hardwired interlock line remains de-asserted on sensor fault. All three fault types must be tested because the detection mechanism differs: signal-loss uses watchdog timeout, out-of-range uses threshold comparator, calibration drift uses moving-average validation. | Test | idempotency:ver-req073-failmode-531 |
| VER-REQ-114 | Verify REQ-074: During first plasma commissioning at Q approximately 3 (partial-load operation), measure net export at 400 kV metering point using National Measurement Accreditation Service calibrated meters over a 30-minute stable burn. Measure station auxiliary load total. Pass criterion: net export at least 50 MW, auxiliary loads below 20 MW; if not achieved, confirm alarm is transmitted to control room within 30 seconds. Rationale: Verification at actual Q=3 operating conditions requires integrated system test during commissioning. Partial-load performance cannot be extrapolated from rated-load measurements because thermal efficiency is non-linear with steam flow and condenser back-pressure. National Measurement Accreditation Service calibration is required for a commercially significant milestone. | Test | idempotency:ver-req074-failmode-531 |
| VER-REQ-115 | Verify REQ-075: During PCS acceptance testing, isolate one steam generator from the primary and secondary circuits and operate the remaining circuits at rated plasma thermal input. Measure net electrical output and gross-to-net efficiency using calibrated grid meters and calorimetric primary flow measurement over a 4-hour steady-state run. Pass criterion: gross-to-net efficiency at least 18%, net output at least 60 MW for 72 continuous hours. Rationale: Degraded configuration testing cannot be performed by analysis alone because condenser back-pressure, cooling tower performance, and turbine admission valve settings change under reduced steam flow in ways that are difficult to model accurately. A 4-hour test at reduced load confirms thermal equilibrium is reached and sustained. The 72-hour endurance is verified via operational log during a planned maintenance window. | Test | idempotency:ver-req075-failmode-531 |
| VER-REQ-116 | Verify REQ-076: On a steam generator tube bundle test loop pressurised with helium tracer at primary design pressure, open a calibrated simulated tube-leak orifice and measure: (a) time from secondary conductivity spike to automatic isolation valve closure, (b) heat transfer continuity at remaining steam generator circuits. Pass criterion: isolation within 60 seconds, heat transfer continues at least 300 MWth equivalent from remaining circuits, primary coolant temperature maintained at or below 200 degrees C. Rationale: Steam generator tube leak isolation is a SIL-3-adjacent function (tritium transport through tube leak) requiring Test verification. Physical test on a tube bundle loop is necessary to verify the leak detection sensitivity and isolation timing; analysis overestimates detection time because secondary water turbulence near the leak varies with local flow conditions. | Test | idempotency:ver-req076-failmode-531 |
| VER-REQ-117 | Verify SUB-REQ-007: Install calibrated Langmuir-probe array and infrared thermography system on a representative first-wall and divertor test module in a linear plasma device operating at 10 MW/m2 steady-state heat flux. Operate at design heat flux for 2,000 thermal cycles. Measure surface temperature, erosion depth (profilometry after each 500-cycle interval), and structural integrity (dye-penetrant inspection). Pass criterion: tungsten armour net erosion rate less than 1 mm per full-power-year (prorated from test duration), no cracking or delamination, peak surface temperature within 200 degrees C of design limit. Rationale: First-wall and divertor thermal endurance is a safety-relevant function: excessive erosion degrades tritium inventory control and produces activated dust (H-007). Test on a representative plasma device is mandatory because finite-element analysis cannot account for synergistic effects of neutron embrittlement, sputtering, and thermal shock in combination. 10 MW/m2 is the design basis from SUB-REQ-007; 1 mm/FPY is the accountability threshold. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-118 | Verify SUB-REQ-008: At a magnet test facility, energise the full TF coil set to the rated design current. Measure on-axis toroidal field with calibrated Hall-probe mapping array. Measure ripple delta-B/B at 64 poloidal positions around the last closed flux surface perimeter. Inject a calibrated quench into one coil by resistance heater; measure time from heater activation to quench detection signal and from detection to energy extraction initiation. Pass criterion: on-axis field >= 3.0 T, ripple <= 0.5% at all 64 positions, quench detection <= 100 ms, energy extraction initiation <= 300 ms from quench initiation. Rationale: TF coil performance is the primary H-003 (superconducting magnet quench) mitigation. SIL-2 requires Test verification. The 100 ms detection and 200 ms extraction timeline derive from energy density calculations: >50 GJ stored energy with detection delay beyond 100 ms risks coil winding insulation damage. Field ripple affects plasma stability margin and is a direct driver of burn performance at Q>=5. | Test | sil-2-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-122 | Verify SUB-REQ-009: During integrated cryogenics commissioning, energise the full TF and PF coil set to rated current with both cold box trains operating. Disable one cold box train and measure helium temperature at all magnet cryostat instrumentation points over a 4-hour period. Pass criterion: all cryostat temperatures maintained at 4.5 K or below with stability plus or minus 0.1 K, demonstrating continued plasma operations capability at reduced pulse duration. Rationale: Cryogenic plant single-train redundancy is required for H-008 (loss of cryogenic cooling) mitigation at SIL-2. Loss of all cryogenic cooling simultaneously causes uncontrolled whole-system quench and asphyxiation risk from helium boil-off. Demonstrating continued magnet operation on one cold box train verifies the redundancy allocation in SUB-REQ-009. | Test | sil-2-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-123 | Verify SUB-REQ-010: During Tritium Plant integrated commissioning on a deuterium-tritium representative feed, operate the Combined Electrolysis and Catalytic Exchange columns at nominal throughput for 72 hours. Measure tritium inventory at start and end using calibrated calorimetry and ionisation chambers. Measure effluent tritium concentration at the drain point. Pass criterion: inventory accountability uncertainty less than or equal to 1 g over 24-hour accounting periods, processing throughput at least 5 g T/day sustained, detritiation factor at least 1e6 across CECE columns, effluent concentration at most 10 Bq/L. Rationale: Tritium accountability is a direct H-002 (tritium release) mitigation and a regulatory prerequisite under GB nuclear site licence conditions. Plus or minus 1 g per 24 hours is the IRCP-recommended minimum for accountancy of inventories in the kg range. Test with actual tritium is mandatory because model predictions of CECE separation factors have uncertainty bands of 15-30% that only integrated testing resolves. | Test | sil-3-supporting, regulatory, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-124 | Verify SUB-REQ-011: During first-of-kind power generation commissioning at rated fusion power, operate the steam turbine-generator set at full load for a minimum 6-hour continuous run. Measure net electrical export at the 400 kV grid connection point. Measure auxiliary plant consumption. Calculate gross-to-net efficiency. Record all forced outage intervals over the 6-month operational campaign. Pass criterion: net export at least 100 MW, efficiency at least 25%, availability at least 90% excluding planned maintenance outages. Rationale: Net power export of 100 MW and 25% efficiency are the commercial mission success criteria in SYS-REQ-002. Analysis alone cannot account for parasitic losses from plasma heating systems and cryogenic plant at full load. 90% availability must be demonstrated over the full 6-month campaign to confirm design margins. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-125 | Verify SUB-REQ-012: On the full-scale Remote Handling test rig in the dedicated remote handling facility, with representative inactive divertor cassette mock-ups installed in the lower vessel port mock-up, execute a timed full-cassette replacement sequence for all cassette positions. Use dose-rate environment simulator to verify continuous operation at 0.5 Sv/hr. Log all unplanned stoppages over a 500-hour endurance test run. Pass criterion: full cassette replacement within 21 calendar days, positioning accuracy at most 2 mm in all three translational axes verified by laser tracker, MTBF at least 500 hours. Rationale: 21-day cassette replacement is the critical path activity in the 4-month maintenance campaign. Demonstration is appropriate because the acceptance evidence is observational: the replacement is either completed within schedule or it is not. MTBF of 500 hours and 2 mm accuracy are safety-relevant because incorrect positioning creates a first-wall gap concentrating heat flux. | Demonstration | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-126 | Verify SUB-REQ-013: During facility commissioning after tokamak assembly, operate the vacuum pumping system from atmospheric pressure with vessel sealed. Measure vessel pressure at calibrated ionisation gauges at 6 divertor pumping duct locations. Measure total outgassing rate by rate-of-rise method after reaching base vacuum. Verify pumping speed during simulated burn by injecting calibrated gas loads. Pass criterion: base pressure at most 1e-6 Pa achieved within 24 hours of vessel closure, outgassing rate at most 1e-3 Pa.m3/s, effective pumping speed at least 50 m3/s at divertor ducts. Rationale: Base vacuum of 1e-6 Pa is required for plasma breakdown. Failure to reach this within 24 hours increases air ingress risk (H-005, SIL-2). Testing is mandatory because modelled pumping speeds have uncertainties of 20-40% from surface condition and geometry effects that only commission-time testing can resolve. | Test | sil-2-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-127 | Verify SUB-REQ-014: During radiation protection commissioning at rated operation, measure dose rates at all designated zone boundary positions using calibrated TEPC instruments traceable to national standards. Inject a calibrated dose-rate signal above the Controlled/High Radiation boundary threshold into the zone interlock system and measure time to interlock activation. Pass criterion: all area classifications consistent with calculated dose rates, access door interlock activates within 100 ms of threshold exceedance, instruments accurate to within 20% of calibration standard. Rationale: Personnel radiation protection interlocks must be demonstrated by Test at full power because shielding effectiveness depends on actual source terms. 100 ms interlock response is a safety-critical timing requirement (H-010, SIL-1) where analysis cannot account for communication delays in hardwired interlock circuits under industrial noise conditions. | Test | sil-1-supporting, regulatory, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-128 | Verify SUB-REQ-049: During ISS commissioning, apply rated 415 V AC three-phase supply and measure process performance at nominal throughput. Interrupt primary supply and verify automatic changeover to backup supply. Measure separation factor on deuterium-tritium representative feed before and after switchover. Pass criterion: uninterrupted ISS operation through supply switchover, separation factor maintained within 5% of nominal value during transition, power quality within specification on backup supply. Rationale: ISS power continuity is a H-002 (tritium release) mitigation: loss of ISS power during separation causes uncontrolled tritium inventory redistribution in the column system. The 5% separation factor criterion ensures tritium balance accountability is maintained through a supply changeover event. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-129 | Verify SUB-REQ-050: During ISS integrated test, assert the PPS emergency isolation hardwired command at the ISS panel interface. Measure time to complete shutdown of all ISS process flows and closure of all isolation valves. Pass criterion: all process flows halted and isolation valves closed within 10 seconds of PPS command assertion, hardwired signal pathway verified by functional continuity check independent of software. Rationale: PPS emergency isolation of ISS is the primary tritium confinement response for column leak events (H-002). The hardwired pathway independence from software is a SIL-3 architecture requirement under IEC 61511. Demonstration verification is appropriate as the acceptance criterion is binary: isolation either completes within 10 s or it does not. | Demonstration | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-130 | Verify SUB-REQ-051: Inspect completed PCS turbine hall building against civil engineering as-built drawings and structural load calculations. Verify floor load rating by review of structural engineering certificate, crane rating plate, and equipment installation records. Pass criterion: structural certificate confirms floor load rating at least 50 kN/m2 at all turbine-generator foundation points, overhead crane rated for heaviest installed component, building footprint accommodates all PCS equipment with required maintenance clearances. Rationale: Turbine hall structural adequacy is a Inspection verification because it is established by design certification and physical review of as-built construction, not by test. Floor load rating of 50 kN/m2 is the minimum derived from steam turbine rotor and generator stator mass distribution. Structural deficiency would prevent safe equipment installation or maintenance. | Inspection | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-131 | Verify SUB-REQ-052: Inspect completed Tritium Plant building against nuclear safety case, civil engineering certificate, and as-built drawings. Verify Category 1 nuclear confinement classification by review of structural safety analysis report and nuclear site licence documentation. Pass criterion: building certified as Category 1 nuclear confinement structure to nuclear grade standards, confinement penetrations logged and sealed per licence conditions, double-barrier confinement confirmed by inspection of all process penetrations. Rationale: Nuclear-grade confinement building classification is established by regulatory inspection and structural certification, not by test. Category 1 confinement is required by H-002 (tritium release) safety case. Physical inspection of penetration seals is the only practical verification method for building-scale confinement. | Inspection | sil-3-supporting, regulatory, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-132 | Verify SUB-REQ-053: Inspect completed Cryogenic Plant building against as-built drawings, mechanical services schedule, and area schedule. Verify insulated floor area by as-built survey measurement. Verify minimum clear height by measurement. Verify helium storage and venting provisions by inspection of installation certificates. Pass criterion: insulated floor area at least 800 m2, minimum clear height at least 8 m in cold box installation areas, helium storage and emergency venting capacity as per design specification confirmed by inspection. Rationale: Cryogenic Plant building adequacy is a design compliance matter verifiable by inspection of construction documentation and physical measurement. The area and height specifications ensure adequate working clearances for cold box installation and maintenance. Helium venting capacity is safety-relevant (H-008, asphyxiation risk). | Inspection | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-133 | Verify SUB-REQ-054: Inspect installed vacuum system equipment layout against as-built drawings. Count installed turbo-molecular pump count and verify cryopump configuration by physical inspection. Verify mechanical connections between vacuum equipment and tokamak support structure by inspection of installation records. Pass criterion: 12 turbo-molecular pumps installed and commissioned, cryopumps installed at divertor and first-wall ports as per design, all mechanical connections to tokamak support structure confirmed by installation certificate review. Rationale: Vacuum system physical configuration compliance is verifiable by inspection of installed equipment against design drawings. The 12 turbo-molecular pump count derives from pumping speed calculations for 50 m3/s aggregate throughput. Physical installation inspection is more reliable than test for configuration compliance. | Inspection | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-134 | Verify SUB-REQ-055: Review structural analysis report for tokamak core assembly, superconducting magnet system, and cryogenic plant support systems. Verify seismic analysis inputs use site-specific ground motion spectra for OBE (0.1g peak ground acceleration) and SSE (0.2g). Verify analysis includes simultaneous LOCA and quench loading combination. Pass criterion: structural analysis report demonstrates all safety class-1 support structures maintain integrity at SSE loading with no plastic deformation at critical joints, combined LOCA and quench scenario analysed with margins meeting nuclear structural design standards. Rationale: Seismic structural integrity is verified by Analysis because physical seismic testing of full-scale tokamak structures is not practicable. The OBE 0.1g and SSE 0.2g values are site-specific inputs. Analysis must include the combined LOCA and quench scenario (H-009, SIL-3) because these events are coupled through common-cause seismic initiation. | Analysis | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-135 | Verify SUB-REQ-056: On a representative in-vessel cooling circuit test loop with passive decay heat removal path installed, simulate plasma termination by stopping active coolant circulation while maintaining 3 MW decay heat injection via electrical heaters. Measure coolant temperature and pressure over a 24-hour passive cooling period. Pass criterion: peak coolant temperature does not exceed 350 degrees C, system pressure remains within design envelope, natural circulation flow initiated and sustained without active components, all instrumentation remains powered from passive sources. Rationale: Passive decay heat removal is the primary H-004 (loss of coolant accident) mitigation following plasma termination. Test is mandatory for SIL-2 functions because natural circulation flow behaviour has strong non-linear dependence on geometry and temperature that analysis cannot bound conservatively. 350 degrees C is the maximum coolant temperature before zirconium-steam reaction risk for beryllium-clad components. | Test | sil-2-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-136 | Verify SUB-REQ-057: During plasma operations commissioning, issue an operator-commanded end-of-pulse shutdown from the main control room at rated Q=5 conditions. Measure heating power ramp-down profile, plasma current ramp-down trajectory, and total plasma current at termination. Pass criterion: heating power ramped to zero within 30 seconds, plasma current ramped down to zero over 10 to 30 seconds per design, plasma current at final termination below 500 kA, no disruption triggered during the ramp-down sequence, vessel structural loads within design envelope. Rationale: Controlled plasma shutdown is the primary planned transition out of Steady-State Burn mode. Failure to execute a smooth ramp-down can trigger a disruption (H-001, SIL-3) with 400 MJ thermal quench. Test is required to verify the actual plasma response to the ramp-down sequence because plasma instability thresholds during current ramp-down are not precisely predictable from MHD analysis alone. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-137 | Verify SUB-REQ-058: During Tritium Plant operational qualification, simulate failure of each active accountancy and confinement component in turn (isotope separation compressor, CECE column heater, process valves). For each single failure, measure tritium accountancy measurement uncertainty and verify confinement barrier status. Pass criterion: tritium accountancy uncertainty remains at most 1 g per 24-hour period in each single-failure state, at least one confinement barrier intact for all single-failure scenarios, automatic isolation initiated for each failure detected. Rationale: Single-failure tolerance for tritium accountability and confinement is a SIL-3 requirement derived from H-002 (tritium release). The regulatory limit of 0.1 g release per event requires that a single component failure cannot cause loss of accountancy (which could mask a leak) or loss of both confinement barriers simultaneously. | Test | sil-3-supporting, regulatory, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-138 | Verify SUB-REQ-059: During ISS integrated test, assert the hardwired manual override at the ISS panel interface and confirm all ISS process flows shut down and all isolation valves close. Verify the override path bypasses software control by disconnecting ISS control software while manual override is asserted and confirming isolation is maintained. Pass criterion: all ISS process flows halted within 30 seconds of manual override assertion, override path functional with software disconnected, physical panel switch confirmed as the sole command path for override. Rationale: Hardwired manual override is the last-resort tritium confinement action for operators when automated systems fail. Independence from software is essential for SIL-3 defense-in-depth. Demonstration verification is appropriate because the test is observational: either the manual override functions independently of software or it does not. | Demonstration | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-139 | Verify IFC-REQ-010: During integrated cryogenics and tritium plant commissioning, operate the LN2 supply interface at rated flow. Measure LN2 temperature at the Tritium Plant inlet and supply flow rate at the interface connection point. Pass criterion: LN2 supply temperature at 77 K plus or minus 2 K, flow rate meets Tritium Plant specification at rated demand, no cross-contamination between LN2 circuit and tritium process measured by gas analysis at both ends of interface. Rationale: LN2 supply at 77 K is required for Tritium Plant cold trap operation. Incorrect LN2 temperature degrades detritiation factor, risking tritium accountability loss (H-002). Cross-contamination check is essential because a tritium-contaminated LN2 circuit would create an uncontrolled release pathway. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-140 | Verify IFC-REQ-011: During integrated vacuum-tritium interface commissioning, operate the tritiated exhaust gas transfer path at rated throughput. Measure gas flow rate and composition at the vacuum system outlet and tritium plant inlet. Verify inter-system isolation valve closure on loss-of-confinement signal. Pass criterion: throughput at least 200 Pa.m3/s at rated condition, tritiated gas composition within specification for ISS intake, isolation valves close within 5 seconds of confinement loss signal. Rationale: Vacuum-to-tritium exhaust interface is the primary tritium process pathway during burn. Insufficient throughput limits fusion power; inadequate isolation on confinement loss creates H-002 release pathway. 200 Pa.m3/s is the rated DT exhaust throughput. 5 s isolation time is derived from maximum tolerable tritium inventory at-risk during an exhaust line failure. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-141 | Verify IFC-REQ-012: During plasma control-vacuum system integrated commissioning, inject test pumping speed setpoint commands from the Plasma Control System to the Vacuum System and measure response time and accuracy. Pass criterion: pumping speed setpoint received and acted on within 100 ms of command transmission, achieved pumping speed within 10% of commanded setpoint, command interface functional over the full operating range of vacuum conditions. Rationale: PCS control of vacuum pumping speed is required for plasma density control during burn. Response time of 100 ms is derived from the plasma confinement time and density control bandwidth needed to respond to ELM events. Test is required because interface latency depends on actual communication stack implementation and cannot be verified by inspection alone. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-142 | Verify IFC-REQ-013: During plasma control-tritium plant integrated commissioning, inject test pellet injection rate commands from the Plasma Control System to the Tritium Plant pellet injector. Measure command latency and injection rate accuracy. Pass criterion: pellet injection rate command executed within 50 ms, achieved injection rate within 5% of commanded rate, command interface verified across the full pellet rate range. Rationale: PCS command of pellet injection rate is the primary fuel control mechanism during Steady-State Burn. 50 ms latency and 5% rate accuracy are derived from plasma density control requirements: larger lag or error can cause plasma density to drift outside the burn window, triggering density-limit disruption (H-001, SIL-3). Test is required as actual latency depends on network and actuator implementation. | Test | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-143 | Verify IFC-REQ-014: During magnet system commissioning at the magnet power supply test facility, energise TF coil set from zero to full rated field via the coil power supply interface. Measure DC voltage and current at the magnet busbars. Test fast discharge by commanding energy extraction and measuring dump resistor current profile. Pass criterion: DC power delivery meets rated voltage and current specification, fast discharge completed within 10 seconds of command, busbar voltage within 5% of specification throughout discharge. Rationale: Coil power supply to superconducting magnet interface is the primary H-003 (magnet quench) mitigation pathway. Fast discharge within 10 seconds is required to extract stored energy below the coil damage threshold. Test at full rated current is mandatory because impedance mismatch at the busbar connection cannot be predicted from design alone and affects discharge timing. | Test | sil-2-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-144 | Verify IFC-REQ-015: Inspect all remote handling tools and manipulator end-effectors that operate inside the tritium confinement boundary against the tritium compatibility certification register. Verify surface coatings and sealing mechanisms by inspection. Check contamination control procedures documentation. Pass criterion: all tools confirmed on certified materials list, all penetrations of confinement boundary use double-seal mechanisms with leak test certification, contamination control procedures reviewed and approved. Rationale: RHS-tritium confinement boundary compatibility is verified by Inspection of material certifications and design documentation because tritium permeation through materials is a property established at manufacturing, not demonstrable without destructive sampling. Double-seal mechanisms are required by H-002 confinement barrier policy. | Inspection | sil-3-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-145 | Verify IFC-REQ-016: During integrated cryogenics-vacuum commissioning, operate the cold head supply interface to vacuum cryopumps at rated capacity. Measure cold head temperature at the cryopump interface manifold for up to 20 cryopump positions. Verify cryopump regeneration cycle without interrupting cold head supply to remaining pumps. Pass criterion: 4.5 K cold heads supplied to all 20 cryopump positions at rated capacity, cryopump regeneration cycle completed without temperature excursion at other pump positions exceeding 0.2 K. Rationale: Cryogenic supply to vacuum cryopumps is required for maintaining divertor pumping speed during burn. Loss of cryopumping reduces vacuum quality and risks plasma contamination. The 0.2 K temperature stability during regeneration cycles verifies that cryopump regeneration does not disrupt plasma operations in adjacent sectors. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-146 | Verify IFC-REQ-017: During PCS-RHS interlock commissioning, assert each hardwired interlock signal from the Plasma Control System that prevents Remote Handling System access during plasma operations. Verify physical access prevention and hardwired pathway independence from software. Pass criterion: all PCS interlock signals prevent RHS access when plasma operations are in progress, interlock path verified as hardwired and independent of software control layer by functional continuity test. Rationale: Hardwired prevention of RHS access during plasma operations is a personnel safety requirement: entry to the tokamak hall during burn would result in lethal neutron dose (H-010). Independence from software is required because software failures must not defeat this barrier. Demonstration is the appropriate method as the test is binary: access is prevented or it is not. | Demonstration | sil-1-supporting, validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-147 | Verify IFC-REQ-018: During facility commissioning, measure AC auxiliary power supply at all PCS-to-tokamak auxiliary supply connection points with all major loads active. Measure voltage, frequency, and power quality. Pass criterion: AC supply voltage within 5% of rated value at all connection points under full auxiliary load, frequency within 0.5 Hz of rated, power quality (THD) within BS EN 61000-3 limits, supply available within 30 seconds of grid restoration after outage. Rationale: Auxiliary AC supply from PCS to tokamak supports diagnostics, control systems, and cryogenic instrumentation during plasma operations. Supply quality affecting plasma diagnostics can trigger false disruption events. The 30-second restoration time after outage is required to avoid a plasma termination on loss of diagnostic power. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-148 | Verify IFC-REQ-019: During grid connection commissioning, measure imported auxiliary AC power from the National Grid at the PCS station loads connection point with all plant auxiliary systems at full load. Verify power import capability across the range from minimum to maximum station load demand. Pass criterion: import power capability confirmed at maximum station loads demand, power quality at import connection point within Grid Code requirements, automatic transfer to on-site generation within 5 seconds of grid loss. Rationale: Grid import for station loads is required for plant commissioning before first plasma (no self-generation available). Automatic transfer to on-site generation on grid loss within 5 seconds ensures continued cryogenic cooling during grid disturbances (H-008 mitigation). Test at full load is required because transformer impedance and cable voltage drop cannot be calculated without site-specific grid impedance data. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| VER-REQ-149 | Verify IFC-REQ-020: During vessel bake-out commissioning, circulate hot nitrogen gas at rated conditions through the tokamak vessel via the Cryogenic Plant bake-out supply interface. Measure nitrogen gas temperature and flow rate at the vessel inlet and the outgassing rate from the vessel during bake-out. Pass criterion: nitrogen supply at 120 degrees C plus or minus 5 K at rated flow rate, vessel wall temperature uniform within 10 degrees C across all measured points, outgassing rate falls below 1e-3 Pa.m3/s within 96 hours of bake-out initiation. Rationale: Vessel bake-out is required to achieve the 1e-6 Pa base vacuum needed for plasma operations. Insufficient bake-out temperature or non-uniform wall heating can leave water ice in crevices that outgasses into the plasma, contaminating the first wall. Test is required because heat transfer in the complex vessel geometry cannot be precisely modelled. | Test | validation-session-544 |
| Requirement | Verified By | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SUB-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-052 | Cold-hold calorimetry verifies CTLN heat leak |
| SUB-REQ-082 | VER-089 | Regulatory documentary inspection for environmental permitting and ISO 14001 EMS |
| SUB-REQ-081 | VER-088 | Post-intervention RGA test for plasma vessel seal integrity in all operational modes |
| SUB-REQ-080 | VER-087 | Regulatory compliance inspection for UK IRR 2017 and ALARA Tritium Plant documentation |
| SUB-REQ-085 | VER-086 | Short-sample and fatigue test for TF Coil Set CICC conductor specification |
| SUB-REQ-084 | VER-085 | Passive quench protection analysis for SMS single-channel failure scenario |
| SUB-REQ-083 | VER-084 | N+1 redundancy functional test for Tritium Plant isotope separation modules |
| SUB-REQ-079 | VER-083 | DBA thermal analysis for Tokamak Core Assembly passive cooling |
| SUB-REQ-078 | VER-082 | Functional test for Tritium Plant DBA isolation within 30 seconds |
| SUB-REQ-076 | VER-081 | Vacuum seal qualification → three-condition helium leak test |
| SUB-REQ-075 | VER-080 | Vacuum pump N+1 redundancy → pump failover pressure test |
| SUB-REQ-074 | VER-079 | SMS MPS redundancy → MPS converter failover FAT |
| SUB-REQ-073 | VER-078 | RHS redundancy req → RHS failover integration test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-121 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-126 | ALARA radiation protection verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-120 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-125 | Magnet quench detection architecture verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-119 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-124 | Tritium plant dual-barrier verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-118 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-123 | Cryogenic plant redundancy verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-117 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-122 | VSPMS power budget verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-103 | SUB-023 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-058 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-102 | SUB-REQ-057 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-057 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-101 | SUB-REQ-056 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-056 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-100 | SUB-REQ-055 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-055 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-099 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-054 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-098 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-053 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-097 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-052 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-096 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-051 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-104 | SUB-024 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-059 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-083 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-007 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-084 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-008 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-090 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-011 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-091 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-012 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-092 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-013 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-093 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-014 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-089 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-010 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-094 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-049 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-095 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | Verification test for SUB-REQ-050 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-088 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | Verification test for cryo plant 4.5K stability |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-082 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-076 | Verification test for degraded-mode subsystem requirement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-081 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-075 | Verification test for degraded-mode subsystem requirement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-080 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-074 | Verification test for degraded-mode subsystem requirement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-079 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-073 | Verification test for degraded-mode subsystem requirement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-078 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-072 | Verification test for degraded-mode subsystem requirement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-062 | SUB-REQ-042 | VER-REQ-098 verifies PCS gross-to-net efficiency requirement SUB-REQ-042 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-061 | SUB-REQ-037 | VER-REQ-097 verifies remote handling campaign duration requirement SUB-REQ-037 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-060 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | VER-REQ-096 verifies radiation zone classification requirement SUB-REQ-014 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | VER-REQ-089 verifies vacuum pump configuration requirement SUB-REQ-054 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | VER-REQ-088 verifies cryogenic plant building requirement SUB-REQ-053 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | VER-REQ-087 verifies tritium building confinement requirement SUB-REQ-052 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | VER-REQ-086 verifies turbine hall structural requirement SUB-REQ-051 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | VER-REQ-085 verifies PPS emergency isolation requirement SUB-REQ-050 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | VER-REQ-084 verifies ISS power consumption requirement SUB-REQ-049 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-036 | SUB-REQ-045 | VER-REQ-073 verifies PCS fast turbine runback requirement SUB-REQ-045 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-035 | SUB-REQ-044 | VER-REQ-072 verifies PCS thermal efficiency requirement SUB-REQ-044 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-034 | SUB-REQ-043 | VER-REQ-071 verifies PCS grid operation requirement SUB-REQ-043 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-033 | SUB-REQ-040 | VER-REQ-070 verifies RHS fault handling requirement SUB-REQ-040 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-032 | SUB-REQ-039 | VER-REQ-069 verifies transfer cask shielding requirement SUB-REQ-039 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-031 | SUB-REQ-038 | VER-REQ-068 verifies RHS radiation hardening requirement SUB-REQ-038 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-030 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | VER-REQ-024 verifies radiation zone boundary requirement SUB-REQ-014 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | VER-REQ-023 verifies vacuum system base pressure requirement SUB-REQ-013 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | VER-REQ-022 verifies remote handling campaign requirement SUB-REQ-012 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | VER-REQ-021 verifies PCS net export requirement SUB-REQ-011 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | VER-REQ-020 verifies cryogenic plant refrigeration requirement SUB-REQ-009 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | VER-REQ-019 verifies tritium accountancy requirement SUB-REQ-010 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | VER-REQ-018 verifies TF coil field requirement SUB-REQ-008 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | VER-REQ-017 verifies first wall/divertor heat flux requirement SUB-REQ-007 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-019 | SUB-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-016 verifies dual-redundant controller failover requirement SUB-REQ-003 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-020 | SUB-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-015 verifies diagnostic data acquisition requirement SUB-REQ-004 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-021 | SUB-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-014 verifies massive material injection requirement SUB-REQ-006 |
| VER-REQ-065 | SUB-REQ-041 | VER-REQ-065 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-041 |
| VER-REQ-064 | SUB-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-064 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-036 |
| VER-REQ-010 | SUB-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-010 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-001 |
| VER-REQ-011 | SUB-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-011 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-002 |
| VER-REQ-012 | SUB-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-012 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-005 |
| VER-REQ-100 | SUB-REQ-055 | VER-REQ-100 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-055 |
| VER-REQ-101 | SUB-REQ-056 | VER-REQ-101 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-056 |
| VER-REQ-038 | SUB-REQ-017 | VER-REQ-038 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-017 |
| VER-REQ-039 | SUB-REQ-018 | VER-REQ-039 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-018 |
| VER-REQ-036 | SUB-REQ-015 | VER-REQ-036 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-015 |
| VER-REQ-037 | SUB-REQ-016 | VER-REQ-037 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-016 |
| VER-REQ-111 | SUB-REQ-057 | VER-REQ-111 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-057 |
| VER-REQ-110 | SUB-REQ-055 | VER-REQ-110 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-055 |
| VER-044 | SUB-REQ-028 | VER-044 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-028 |
| VER-045 | SUB-REQ-024 | VER-045 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-024 |
| VER-046 | SUB-REQ-030 | VER-046 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-030 |
| VER-047 | SUB-REQ-026 | VER-047 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-026 |
| VER-041 | SUB-REQ-021 | VER-041 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-021 |
| VER-042 | SUB-REQ-019 | VER-042 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-019 |
| VER-043 | SUB-REQ-020 | VER-043 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-020 |
| VER-048 | SUB-024 | VER-048 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-024 |
| VER-049 | SUB-023 | VER-049 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-023 |
| VER-REQ-050 | SUB-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-050 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-031 |
| VER-REQ-051 | SUB-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-051 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-032 |
| VER-REQ-052 | SUB-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-052 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-033 |
| VER-REQ-053 | SUB-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-053 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-034 |
| VER-REQ-054 | SUB-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-054 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-035 |
| VER-REQ-049 | SUB-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-049 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-029 |
| VER-REQ-040 | SUB-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-040 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-022 |
| VER-REQ-046 | SUB-REQ-027 | VER-REQ-046 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-027 |
| VER-REQ-045 | SUB-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-045 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-025 |
| VER-REQ-044 | SUB-REQ-023 | VER-REQ-044 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SUB-REQ-023 |
| SUB-REQ-057 | VER-REQ-111 | Planned shutdown sequence verified by commissioning test |
| SUB-REQ-055 | VER-REQ-110 | Structural seismic qualification analysis entry with explicit FEA stress ratio acceptance criteria |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | SUB-REQ-054 vacuum system component count verified by VER-REQ-089 commissioning inspection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | SUB-REQ-053 cryogenic plant building floor area verified by VER-REQ-088 inspection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | SUB-REQ-052 tritium plant confinement building verified by VER-REQ-087 structural inspection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | SUB-REQ-051 turbine hall structural load verified by VER-REQ-086 inspection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | SUB-REQ-050 ISS emergency isolation verified by VER-REQ-085 PPS integration test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | SUB-REQ-049 ISS power supply verified by VER-REQ-084 electrical acceptance test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-060 | SUB-REQ-014 radiation zone classification verified by VER-REQ-096 area characterisation |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | SUB-REQ-013 vacuum base pressure verified by VER-REQ-023 pump-down test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | SUB-REQ-012 divertor cassette replacement time verified by VER-REQ-022 RHS demonstration |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | SUB-REQ-011 PCS net power export verified by VER-REQ-021 commissioning test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | SUB-REQ-010 tritium inventory uncertainty verified by VER-REQ-019 accountancy test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | SUB-REQ-009 cryostat temperature verified by VER-REQ-020 cryogenic commissioning |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | SUB-REQ-008 TF coil field verified by VER-REQ-018 magnetic field mapping |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | SUB-REQ-007 divertor heat flux verified by VER-REQ-017 calorimetric test |
| SUB-REQ-056 | VER-REQ-101 | SUB-REQ-056 passive decay heat path verified by VER-REQ-101 loss-of-active-cooling test |
| SUB-REQ-055 | VER-REQ-100 | SUB-REQ-055 seismic structural requirement verified by VER-REQ-100 ASCE 4-16 analysis |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | SUB-REQ-054 is verified by VER-REQ-089 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | SUB-REQ-053 is verified by VER-REQ-088 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | SUB-REQ-052 is verified by VER-REQ-087 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | SUB-REQ-051 is verified by VER-REQ-086 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | SUB-REQ-050 is verified by VER-REQ-085 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | SUB-REQ-049 is verified by VER-REQ-084 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-060 | SUB-REQ-014 is verified by VER-REQ-096 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | SUB-REQ-013 is verified by VER-REQ-023 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | SUB-REQ-012 is verified by VER-REQ-022 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | SUB-REQ-011 is verified by VER-REQ-021 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | SUB-REQ-010 is verified by VER-REQ-019 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | SUB-REQ-009 is verified by VER-REQ-020 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | SUB-REQ-008 is verified by VER-REQ-018 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | SUB-REQ-007 is verified by VER-REQ-017 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | VER-REQ-089 verifies SUB-REQ-054 vacuum penetrations count |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | VER-REQ-088 verifies SUB-REQ-053 cryogenic plant building |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | VER-REQ-087 verifies SUB-REQ-052 tritium plant confinement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | VER-REQ-086 verifies SUB-REQ-051 turbine hall structure |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | VER-REQ-085 verifies SUB-REQ-050 PPS emergency isolation |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | VER-REQ-084 verifies SUB-REQ-049 ISS power consumption |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | VER-REQ-023 verifies SUB-REQ-013 vacuum base pressure |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | VER-REQ-022 verifies SUB-REQ-012 remote handling dexterity |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | VER-REQ-021 verifies SUB-REQ-011 net electrical output |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | VER-REQ-020 verifies SUB-REQ-009 cryogenic cooling capacity |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | VER-REQ-019 verifies SUB-REQ-010 tritium processing throughput |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | VER-REQ-018 verifies SUB-REQ-008 TF coil field strength |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | VER-REQ-017 verifies SUB-REQ-007 divertor heat load |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | VER-REQ-089 verifies SUB-REQ-054 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | VER-REQ-088 verifies SUB-REQ-053 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | VER-REQ-087 verifies SUB-REQ-052 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | VER-REQ-086 verifies SUB-REQ-051 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | VER-REQ-085 verifies SUB-REQ-050 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | VER-REQ-084 verifies SUB-REQ-049 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-036 | SUB-REQ-045 | VER-REQ-073 verifies SUB-REQ-045 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-035 | SUB-REQ-044 | VER-REQ-072 verifies SUB-REQ-044 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-034 | SUB-REQ-043 | VER-REQ-071 verifies SUB-REQ-043 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-033 | SUB-REQ-040 | VER-REQ-070 verifies SUB-REQ-040 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-032 | SUB-REQ-039 | VER-REQ-069 verifies SUB-REQ-039 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-031 | SUB-REQ-038 | VER-REQ-068 verifies SUB-REQ-038 |
| VER-REQ-065 | SUB-REQ-041 | VER-REQ-065 verifies SUB-REQ-041 |
| VER-REQ-064 | SUB-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-064 verifies SUB-REQ-036 |
| VER-REQ-054 | SUB-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-054 verifies SUB-REQ-035 |
| VER-REQ-053 | SUB-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-053 verifies SUB-REQ-034 |
| VER-REQ-052 | SUB-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-052 verifies SUB-REQ-033 |
| VER-REQ-051 | SUB-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-051 verifies SUB-REQ-032 |
| VER-REQ-050 | SUB-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-050 verifies SUB-REQ-031 |
| VER-REQ-049 | SUB-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-049 verifies SUB-REQ-029 |
| VER-REQ-046 | SUB-REQ-027 | VER-REQ-046 verifies SUB-REQ-027 |
| VER-REQ-045 | SUB-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-045 verifies SUB-REQ-025 |
| VER-REQ-044 | SUB-REQ-023 | VER-REQ-044 verifies SUB-REQ-023 |
| VER-REQ-040 | SUB-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-040 verifies SUB-REQ-022 |
| VER-REQ-039 | SUB-REQ-018 | VER-REQ-039 verifies SUB-REQ-018 |
| VER-REQ-038 | SUB-REQ-017 | VER-REQ-038 verifies SUB-REQ-017 |
| VER-REQ-037 | SUB-REQ-016 | VER-REQ-037 verifies SUB-REQ-016 |
| VER-REQ-036 | SUB-REQ-015 | VER-REQ-036 verifies SUB-REQ-015 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | VER-REQ-023 verifies SUB-REQ-013 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | VER-REQ-022 verifies SUB-REQ-012 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | VER-REQ-021 verifies SUB-REQ-011 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | VER-REQ-020 verifies SUB-REQ-009 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | VER-REQ-019 verifies SUB-REQ-010 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | VER-REQ-018 verifies SUB-REQ-008 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | VER-REQ-017 verifies SUB-REQ-007 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-019 | SUB-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-016 verifies SUB-REQ-003 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-020 | SUB-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-015 verifies SUB-REQ-004 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-021 | SUB-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-014 verifies SUB-REQ-006 |
| VER-REQ-012 | SUB-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-012 verifies SUB-REQ-005 |
| VER-REQ-011 | SUB-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-011 verifies SUB-REQ-002 |
| VER-REQ-010 | SUB-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-010 verifies SUB-REQ-001 |
| VER-049 | SUB-023 | VER-049 verifies SUB-023 |
| VER-048 | SUB-024 | VER-048 verifies SUB-024 |
| VER-047 | SUB-REQ-026 | VER-047 verifies SUB-REQ-026 |
| VER-046 | SUB-REQ-030 | VER-046 verifies SUB-REQ-030 |
| VER-045 | SUB-REQ-024 | VER-045 verifies SUB-REQ-024 |
| VER-044 | SUB-REQ-028 | VER-044 verifies SUB-REQ-028 |
| VER-043 | SUB-REQ-020 | VER-043 verifies SUB-REQ-020 |
| VER-042 | SUB-REQ-019 | VER-042 verifies SUB-REQ-019 |
| VER-041 | SUB-REQ-021 | VER-041 verifies SUB-REQ-021 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-060 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | VER for radiation zone classification and access interlocks |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-062 | SUB-REQ-042 | VER for gross-to-net thermal efficiency measurement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-061 | SUB-REQ-037 | VER for 90-day blanket module exchange demonstration |
| SUB-REQ-045 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-036 | SUB-REQ-045/VER-REQ-073 verification |
| SUB-REQ-044 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-035 | SUB-REQ-044/VER-REQ-072 verification |
| SUB-REQ-043 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-034 | SUB-REQ-043/VER-REQ-071 verification |
| SUB-REQ-040 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-033 | SUB-REQ-040/VER-REQ-070 verification |
| SUB-REQ-039 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-032 | SUB-REQ-039/VER-REQ-069 verification |
| SUB-REQ-038 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-031 | SUB-REQ-038/VER-REQ-068 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-042 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-059 | SUB-REQ-054 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-041 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-058 | SUB-REQ-053 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-040 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-057 | SUB-REQ-052 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-039 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-056 | SUB-REQ-051 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-038 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-055 | SUB-REQ-050 verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-037 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-054 | SUB-REQ-049 verification |
| SUB-REQ-030 | VER-046 | SUB-REQ-030 is verified by VER-046 |
| SUB-023 | VER-049 | SUB-023 is verified by VER-049 |
| SUB-024 | VER-048 | SUB-024 is verified by VER-048 |
| SUB-REQ-019 | VER-042 | SUB-REQ-019 is verified by VER-042 |
| SUB-REQ-020 | VER-043 | SUB-REQ-020 is verified by VER-043 |
| SUB-REQ-021 | VER-041 | SUB-REQ-021 is verified by VER-041 |
| SUB-REQ-024 | VER-045 | SUB-REQ-024 is verified by VER-045 |
| SUB-REQ-026 | VER-047 | SUB-REQ-026 is verified by VER-047 |
| SUB-REQ-028 | VER-044 | SUB-REQ-028 is verified by VER-044 |
| SUB-REQ-045 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-036 | PCS turbine runback to 20% load within 60s on disruption signal verified by hardware test |
| SUB-REQ-044 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-035 | Steam generator ≥500 MWth heat transfer and ≤180°C primary outlet verified under plasma operation |
| SUB-REQ-043 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-034 | PCS grid code CC.6 compliance verified by witnessed measurement at 400kV metering point |
| SUB-REQ-040 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-033 | RHS fault halt ≤500ms and 30-minute load hold verified by hardware fault injection |
| SUB-REQ-039 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-032 | Transfer Cask biological shielding ≤2 mSv/hr verified by calibrated gamma survey |
| SUB-REQ-038 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-031 | RHS radiation hardening verified by Co-60 + neutron irradiation acceptance test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-029 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-030 | Radiation Protection System zoning classification verified by full-plant dose rate survey |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-017 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-027 | Vacuum System pump-down to 1e-7 Pa base pressure verified after vessel bakeout |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-018 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-028 | RHS divertor cassette 21-day replacement schedule verified by full-scale test facility |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-016 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-026 | PCS steam turbine 100MW net export verified by sustained full-power plasma operation |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-015 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-025 | Tritium accountability ±1g uncertainty verified by integrated commissioning inventory test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-014 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-024 | Cryogenic Plant 4.5K magnet cooling verified by cold commissioning test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-013 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-023 | SMS TF coil 3.0T field and quench detection verified by energisation test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-012 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-022 | TCA first wall heat flux verified by stepped plasma power commissioning |
| SUB-REQ-006 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-021 | Disruption mitigation material injection verified by injection timing test |
| SUB-REQ-004 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-020 | PCS DAQ front-end 40+ channel synchronous sampling verified by pulse injection |
| SUB-REQ-003 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-019 | PCS dual-redundant controller verified by failover injection test |
| SUB-REQ-042 | VER-REQ-067 | Plasma commissioning energy chain test verifies PCS efficiency |
| SUB-REQ-037 | VER-REQ-066 | Integration trial verifies RHS campaign duration and end-to-end capability |
| SUB-REQ-041 | VER-REQ-065 | Plasma commissioning power measurement verifies net electrical output |
| SUB-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-064 | Laser tracker positioning test verifies IVIMM accuracy |
| SUB-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-054 | Hardware fault injection verifies CCS safe-state timing |
| SUB-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-053 | Full cool-down run verifies CCS gradient control |
| SUB-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-010 | Hardware-in-the-loop timing test verifies 1 ms cycle time |
| SUB-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-011 | Disruption database replay verifies detection probability and latency |
| SUB-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-012 | Fault injection demonstration verifies PCS safe state transition |
| SUB-REQ-015 | VER-REQ-036 | Helium leak test and hydrostatic test for vessel integrity |
| SUB-REQ-016 | VER-REQ-037 | MCNP6 neutronics analysis for blanket TBR performance |
| SUB-REQ-017 | VER-REQ-038 | FEM electromagnetic analysis and post-disruption leak test for safe state |
| SUB-REQ-018 | VER-REQ-039 | PEPS throughput test verifies SUB-REQ-018 |
| SUB-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-040 | ADS safety function test verifies SUB-REQ-022 |
| SUB-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-045 | TF field performance verified by Hall probe measurement |
| SUB-REQ-027 | VER-REQ-046 | MPSS energy extraction verified by timed interlock test |
| SUB-REQ-023 | VER-REQ-044 | QDPS quench detection verified by resistive voltage injection test |
| SUB-REQ-018 | VER-REQ-043 | Tritium Plant SUB requirement verified by end-to-end commissioning test |
| SUB-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-049 | VS pump pressure verified by vacuum measurement test |
| SUB-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-050 | Calorimetric single-train test verifies HRS redundancy capacity |
| SUB-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-051 | Recovery test verifies HMS 95% helium capture |
| IFC-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-063 | Disruption signal latency test verifies PCS-PCS interface |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-105 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-010 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-108 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-013 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-109 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-014 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-106 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-011 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-107 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-012 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-112 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-017 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-113 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-018 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-110 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-015 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-111 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-016 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-114 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-019 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-115 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | Verification test for IFC-REQ-020 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-053 | IFC-REQ-023 | VER-REQ-083 verifies TP-CP cryogenic tritium interface IFC-REQ-023 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-052 | IFC-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-082 provides second verification for PCS grid export interface IFC-REQ-009 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-051 | IFC-REQ-008 | VER-REQ-081 provides second verification for RHS-TCA port access interface IFC-REQ-008 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-050 | IFC-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-080 provides second verification for TCA-VS vacuum interface IFC-REQ-007 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-049 | IFC-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-079 provides second verification for PCS-SMS coil current interface IFC-REQ-006 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-048 | IFC-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-078 provides second verification for TCA-PCS diagnostic interface IFC-REQ-005 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-047 | IFC-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-077 provides second verification for TCA-PCS coolant interface IFC-REQ-004 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-046 | IFC-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-076 provides second verification for TP-TCA pellet injection interface IFC-REQ-003 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-045 | IFC-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-075 provides second verification for CP-SMS cryogenic interface IFC-REQ-002 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-044 | IFC-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-074 provides second verification for TCA-SMS magnetic field interface IFC-REQ-001 |
| VER-REQ-035 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | VER-REQ-035 verifies vessel bakeout heating interface IFC-REQ-020 |
| VER-REQ-034 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | VER-REQ-034 verifies station auxiliary load interface IFC-REQ-019 |
| VER-REQ-033 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | VER-REQ-033 verifies PCS-TCA auxiliary AC power interface IFC-REQ-018 |
| VER-REQ-032 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | VER-REQ-032 verifies RHS-PCS plasma-active interlock IFC-REQ-017 |
| VER-REQ-031 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | VER-REQ-031 verifies cryogenic pumping interface IFC-REQ-016 |
| VER-REQ-030 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | VER-REQ-030 verifies RHS-TCA remote handling port interface IFC-REQ-015 |
| VER-REQ-029 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | VER-REQ-029 verifies PCS-SMS coil current interface IFC-REQ-014 |
| VER-REQ-028 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | VER-REQ-028 verifies PCS-TSDS pellet injection interface IFC-REQ-013 |
| VER-REQ-027 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | VER-REQ-027 verifies PCS-TCA fuelling interface IFC-REQ-012 |
| VER-REQ-026 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | VER-REQ-026 verifies vacuum-tritium exhaust interface IFC-REQ-011 |
| VER-REQ-025 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | VER-REQ-025 verifies N2 supply to tritium plant interface IFC-REQ-010 |
| VER-REQ-061 | IFC-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-061 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-034 |
| VER-REQ-060 | IFC-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-060 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-033 |
| VER-REQ-063 | IFC-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-063 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-036 |
| VER-REQ-062 | IFC-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-062 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-035 |
| VER-REQ-007 | IFC-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-007 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-007 |
| VER-REQ-006 | IFC-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-006 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-006 |
| VER-REQ-005 | IFC-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-005 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-005 |
| VER-REQ-004 | IFC-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-004 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-004 |
| VER-REQ-003 | IFC-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-003 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-003 |
| VER-REQ-002 | IFC-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-002 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-002 |
| VER-REQ-001 | IFC-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-001 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-001 |
| VER-REQ-009 | IFC-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-009 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-009 |
| VER-REQ-008 | IFC-REQ-008 | VER-REQ-008 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-008 |
| VER-039 | IFC-REQ-024 | VER-039 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-024 |
| VER-040 | IFC-REQ-027 | VER-040 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-027 |
| VER-REQ-058 | IFC-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-058 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-031 |
| VER-REQ-059 | IFC-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-059 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-032 |
| VER-REQ-055 | IFC-REQ-028 | VER-REQ-055 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-028 |
| VER-REQ-056 | IFC-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-056 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-029 |
| VER-REQ-057 | IFC-REQ-030 | VER-REQ-057 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-030 |
| VER-REQ-048 | IFC-REQ-026 | VER-REQ-048 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-026 |
| VER-REQ-042 | IFC-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-042 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-022 |
| VER-REQ-041 | IFC-REQ-021 | VER-REQ-041 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-021 |
| VER-REQ-047 | IFC-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-047 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with IFC-REQ-025 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | VER-REQ-035 | IFC-REQ-020 TCA to Cryogenic Plant bake-out interface verified by VER-REQ-035 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | VER-REQ-034 | IFC-REQ-019 Grid to PCS station load interface verified by VER-REQ-034 grid connection test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | VER-REQ-033 | IFC-REQ-018 PCS to TCA auxiliary power supply interface verified by VER-REQ-033 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | VER-REQ-032 | IFC-REQ-017 PCS to RHS plasma inhibit hardwire interface verified by VER-REQ-032 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | VER-REQ-031 | IFC-REQ-016 Cryogenic Plant to Vacuum System cold heads verified by VER-REQ-031 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | VER-REQ-030 | IFC-REQ-015 RHS tritium boundary interface verified by VER-REQ-030 contamination inspection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | VER-REQ-029 | IFC-REQ-014 coil power supply to SMS interface verified by VER-REQ-029 magnet energisation test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | VER-REQ-028 | IFC-REQ-013 pellet fuel injection interface verified by VER-REQ-028 fuelling integration test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | VER-REQ-027 | IFC-REQ-012 PCS to vacuum system neutral gas signal interface verified by VER-REQ-027 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | VER-REQ-026 | IFC-REQ-011 vacuum exhaust to Tritium Plant interface verified by VER-REQ-026 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | VER-REQ-025 | IFC-REQ-010 LN2 supply interface verified by VER-REQ-025 cryogenic interface test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-053 | IFC-REQ-023 | VER-REQ-083 verifies IFC-REQ-023 |
| VER-REQ-063 | IFC-REQ-036 | VER-REQ-063 verifies IFC-REQ-036 |
| VER-REQ-062 | IFC-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-062 verifies IFC-REQ-035 |
| VER-REQ-061 | IFC-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-061 verifies IFC-REQ-034 |
| VER-REQ-060 | IFC-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-060 verifies IFC-REQ-033 |
| VER-REQ-059 | IFC-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-059 verifies IFC-REQ-032 |
| VER-REQ-058 | IFC-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-058 verifies IFC-REQ-031 |
| VER-REQ-057 | IFC-REQ-030 | VER-REQ-057 verifies IFC-REQ-030 |
| VER-REQ-056 | IFC-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-056 verifies IFC-REQ-029 |
| VER-REQ-055 | IFC-REQ-028 | VER-REQ-055 verifies IFC-REQ-028 |
| VER-040 | IFC-REQ-027 | VER-040 verifies IFC-REQ-027 |
| VER-REQ-048 | IFC-REQ-026 | VER-REQ-048 verifies IFC-REQ-026 |
| VER-REQ-047 | IFC-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-047 verifies IFC-REQ-025 |
| VER-039 | IFC-REQ-024 | VER-039 verifies IFC-REQ-024 |
| VER-REQ-042 | IFC-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-042 verifies IFC-REQ-022 |
| VER-REQ-041 | IFC-REQ-021 | VER-REQ-041 verifies IFC-REQ-021 |
| VER-REQ-035 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | VER-REQ-035 verifies IFC-REQ-020 |
| VER-REQ-034 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | VER-REQ-034 verifies IFC-REQ-019 |
| VER-REQ-033 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | VER-REQ-033 verifies IFC-REQ-018 |
| VER-REQ-032 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | VER-REQ-032 verifies IFC-REQ-017 |
| VER-REQ-031 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | VER-REQ-031 verifies IFC-REQ-016 |
| VER-REQ-030 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | VER-REQ-030 verifies IFC-REQ-015 |
| VER-REQ-029 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | VER-REQ-029 verifies IFC-REQ-014 |
| VER-REQ-028 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | VER-REQ-028 verifies IFC-REQ-013 |
| VER-REQ-027 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | VER-REQ-027 verifies IFC-REQ-012 |
| VER-REQ-026 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | VER-REQ-026 verifies IFC-REQ-011 |
| VER-REQ-025 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | VER-REQ-025 verifies IFC-REQ-010 |
| VER-REQ-009 | IFC-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-009 verifies IFC-REQ-009 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-008 | IFC-REQ-008 | VER-REQ-008 verifies IFC-REQ-008 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-007 | IFC-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-007 verifies IFC-REQ-007 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-006 | IFC-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-006 verifies IFC-REQ-006 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-005 | IFC-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-005 verifies IFC-REQ-005 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-004 | IFC-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-004 verifies IFC-REQ-004 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-003 | IFC-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-003 verifies IFC-REQ-003 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-002 | IFC-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-002 verifies IFC-REQ-002 interface requirement |
| VER-REQ-001 | IFC-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-001 verifies IFC-REQ-001 interface requirement |
| IFC-REQ-023 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-053 | BTES-ISS tritium transfer interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-027 | VER-040 | IFC-REQ-027 is verified by VER-040 |
| IFC-REQ-024 | VER-039 | IFC-REQ-024 is verified by VER-039 |
| IFC-REQ-009 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-052 | PCS/Grid power export interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-008 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-051 | RHS/TCA maintenance access interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-007 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-050 | Vacuum System/TCA base pressure interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-006 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-049 | PCS/SMS coil current command interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-005 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-048 | PCS/TCA diagnostic data interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-004 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-047 | TCA/PCS thermal power transfer interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-003 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-046 | Tritium Plant/TCA fuel injection interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-002 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-045 | Cryo/SMS helium coolant interface verification |
| IFC-REQ-001 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-044 | TCA/SMS magnetic field interface verification |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | VER-REQ-035 | TCA-Cryo bakeout hot gas interface verified by vessel bakeout heating test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | VER-REQ-034 | Grid-PCS station load import interface verified by commissioning grid connection test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | VER-REQ-033 | PCS-TCA auxiliary AC power interface verified by commissioning supply test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | VER-REQ-032 | PCS-RHS hardwired plasma-off interlock verified by interlock assertion test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | VER-REQ-031 | Cryo-Vacuum 4.5K cold head interface verified by integrated commissioning test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | VER-REQ-030 | RHS-Tritium Plant tool decontamination interface verified by full-scale mock-up |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | VER-REQ-029 | Coil power supply DC current interface verified by step setpoint test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | VER-REQ-028 | PCS-Tritium pellet injection command interface verified by injection sequence test |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | VER-REQ-027 | PCS-Vacuum pumping setpoint interface verified by calibrated neutral gas pulses |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | VER-REQ-026 | Tritiated exhaust interface verified by simulated exhaust gas injection |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | VER-REQ-025 | LN2 supply interface (77K, 0.5kg/s) verified by cryogenic commissioning flow test |
| IFC-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-001 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-001 |
| IFC-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-002 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-002 |
| IFC-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-003 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-003 |
| IFC-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-004 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-004 |
| IFC-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-005 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-005 |
| IFC-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-006 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-006 |
| IFC-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-007 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-007 |
| IFC-REQ-008 | VER-REQ-008 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-008 |
| IFC-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-009 | Integration test verification for IFC-REQ-009 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-001 | VER-REQ-025 | Integration test for LN2 supply to Tritium Plant cryo interface |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-002 | VER-REQ-026 | Integration test for tritiated exhaust gas transfer at vacuum-tritium interface |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-004 | VER-REQ-027 | Integration test for PCS vacuum neutral gas signal latency and accuracy |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-003 | VER-REQ-028 | Integration test for PCS pellet injection command interface |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-005 | VER-REQ-029 | Integration test for coil power supply command and quench alarm relay |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-007 | VER-REQ-030 | Demonstration test for RHS-tritium plant remote handling compatibility |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-006 | VER-REQ-031 | Integration test for cryogenic cold heads in vacuum chamber |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-009 | VER-REQ-032 | Safety test for PCS-RHS plasma-active hardwired interlock |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-008 | VER-REQ-033 | Integration test for TCA auxiliary AC power supply from Power Conversion |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-010 | VER-REQ-034 | Commissioning test for grid import station load measurement |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-011 | VER-REQ-035 | Integration test for TCA vessel bakeout heating interface |
| IFC-REQ-021 | VER-REQ-041 | Integration test verifies PEPS-ISS interface compliance |
| IFC-REQ-022 | VER-REQ-042 | Integration test verifies ISS-TSDS batch transfer compliance |
| IFC-REQ-025 | VER-REQ-047 | MPSS-TF power interface verified by instrumented ramp test |
| IFC-REQ-026 | VER-REQ-048 | QDPS-TF voltage tap interface verified by bandwidth and impedance test |
| IFC-REQ-028 | VER-REQ-055 | Cold commissioning test verifies HRS-CTLN interface conditions |
| IFC-REQ-029 | VER-REQ-056 | Fieldbus latency and e-stop independence test verifies CCS-HRS interface |
| IFC-REQ-030 | VER-REQ-057 | Post-quench test verifies HMS-HRS gas supply interface |
| IFC-REQ-031 | VER-REQ-058 | EtherCAT latency test verifies IVIMM command interface |
| IFC-REQ-032 | VER-REQ-059 | Helium leak test verifies cask-port docking interface |
| IFC-REQ-033 | VER-REQ-060 | Video latency test verifies viewing system interface |
| IFC-REQ-034 | VER-REQ-061 | Pressure test and leak test verify SG primary-secondary boundary |
| IFC-REQ-035 | VER-REQ-062 | Commissioning electrical test verifies turbine-generator to grid interface |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-071 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-043 | VER-REQ-109 verifies radiobiological protection requirement SYS-REQ-016 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-070 | SYS-REQ-015 | VER-REQ-108 verifies grid code compliance requirement SYS-REQ-015 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-069 | SYS-REQ-014 | VER-REQ-107 verifies activated material inventory requirement SYS-REQ-014 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-068 | SYS-REQ-013 | VER-REQ-106 verifies diagnostic system requirement SYS-REQ-013 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-067 | SYS-REQ-010 | VER-REQ-105 verifies plant availability requirement SYS-REQ-010 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-066 | SYS-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-104 verifies remote handling campaign requirement SYS-REQ-009 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-065 | SYS-REQ-008 | VER-REQ-103 verifies vacuum base pressure requirement SYS-REQ-008 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-064 | SYS-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-102 verifies tritium breeding ratio requirement SYS-REQ-003 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-063 | SYS-REQ-001 | VER-REQ-099 verifies system-level plasma burn requirement SYS-REQ-001 |
| VER-REQ-067 | SYS-REQ-002 | VER-REQ-067 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-002 |
| VER-REQ-066 | SYS-REQ-009 | VER-REQ-066 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-009 |
| VER-REQ-013 | SYS-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-013 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-004 |
| VER-REQ-094 | SYS-REQ-011 | VER-REQ-094 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-011 |
| VER-REQ-095 | SYS-REQ-012 | VER-REQ-095 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-012 |
| VER-REQ-090 | SYS-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-090 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-004 |
| VER-REQ-091 | SYS-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-091 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-005 |
| VER-REQ-092 | SYS-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-092 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-006 |
| VER-REQ-093 | SYS-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-093 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-007 |
| VER-REQ-043 | SYS-REQ-003 | VER-REQ-043 specifies the test procedure demonstrating compliance with SYS-REQ-003 |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-043 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-071 | SYS-REQ-016 radiobiological protection verified by VER-REQ-109 dose assessment and RPS approval |
| SYS-REQ-015 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-070 | SYS-REQ-015 Grid Code power quality verified by VER-REQ-108 grid connection test |
| SYS-REQ-014 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-069 | SYS-REQ-014 decommissioning waste fraction verified by VER-REQ-107 activation analysis |
| SYS-REQ-013 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-068 | SYS-REQ-013 plasma diagnostic coverage verified by VER-REQ-106 commissioning enumeration |
| SYS-REQ-010 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-067 | SYS-REQ-010 operational availability verified by VER-REQ-105 campaign log analysis |
| SYS-REQ-009 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-066 | SYS-REQ-009 remote handling campaign time verified by VER-REQ-104 full-scale RHS demonstration |
| SYS-REQ-008 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-065 | SYS-REQ-008 ultra-high vacuum integrity verified by VER-REQ-103 pump-down and leak test |
| SYS-REQ-003 | REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-064 | SYS-REQ-003 TBR ≥1.1 verified by VER-REQ-102 operational breeding measurement campaign |
| VER-REQ-065 | SYS-REQ-002 | VER-065 verifies SYS-REQ-002 net 100MW electrical output |
| REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-063 | SYS-REQ-001 | Verification of Q>=5 burn at >=10MA plasma current |
| VER-REQ-095 | SYS-REQ-012 | VER-REQ-095 tests neutron dose rates in all occupied areas at full power against 10 µSv/hr limit |
| VER-REQ-094 | SYS-REQ-011 | VER-REQ-094 tests seismic trip response time (100 ms shutdown) and full subsystem safe-state within 10 s |
| VER-REQ-093 | SYS-REQ-007 | VER-REQ-093 tests passive decay heat removal for 72 hours with no AC power |
| VER-REQ-092 | SYS-REQ-006 | VER-REQ-092 tests quench detection latency, energy extraction time, and hot-spot temperature limit |
| VER-REQ-091 | SYS-REQ-005 | VER-REQ-091 tests dual tritium containment barrier integrity and < 0.1 g single-event release limit |
| VER-REQ-090 | SYS-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-090 tests SYS-REQ-004 disruption mitigation actuation time and first-wall thermal load limits |
| SYS-REQ-004 | VER-REQ-013 | End-to-end integration test verifies SYS-REQ-004 disruption mitigation response |
| Ref | Document | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| IFC-REQ-010 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Tritium Plant and Cryogenic Plant SHALL supply liquid nitrogen at 77 K +/- 2 K at a flow rate ... |
| IFC-REQ-011 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Vacuum System and Tritium Plant SHALL transfer tritiated exhaust gas at throughput up to 200 P... |
| IFC-REQ-012 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Plasma Control System and Vacuum System SHALL transmit divertor neutral gas pumping speed setp... |
| IFC-REQ-013 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Plasma Control System and Tritium Plant SHALL transmit pellet fuel injection rate commands at ... |
| IFC-REQ-014 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Power Conversion System coil power supplies and Superconducting Magnet System SHALL deliver DC... |
| IFC-REQ-015 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Remote Handling System and Tritium Plant SHALL ensure all remote handling tools operating insi... |
| IFC-REQ-016 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Cryogenic Plant and Vacuum System SHALL supply 4.5 K cold heads to up to 20 vacuum cryopump bo... |
| IFC-REQ-017 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Plasma Control System and Remote Handling System SHALL provide hardwired interlock signals pre... |
| IFC-REQ-018 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Power Conversion System and Tokamak Core Assembly SHALL supply auxiliary AC electrical power a... |
| IFC-REQ-019 | interface-requirements | The interface between the National Electrical Grid and Power Conversion System for station loads SHALL import auxiliary ... |
| IFC-REQ-020 | interface-requirements | The interface between the Tokamak Core Assembly and Cryogenic Plant for vessel bake-out SHALL supply hot nitrogen gas at... |
| SUB-REQ-007 | subsystem-requirements | The Tokamak Core Assembly first wall and divertor SHALL withstand steady-state peak heat flux of 10 MW/m2 on the diverto... |
| SUB-REQ-008 | subsystem-requirements | The Superconducting Magnet System TF coil set SHALL generate a toroidal magnetic field of 3.0 T or greater on the plasma... |
| SUB-REQ-009 | subsystem-requirements | The Cryogenic Plant SHALL maintain superconducting magnet cryostats at 4.5 K or below with temperature stability of plus... |
| SUB-REQ-010 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant SHALL account for tritium inventory with measurement uncertainty of plus or minus 1 g or less per 24-h... |
| SUB-REQ-011 | subsystem-requirements | The Power Conversion System steam turbine-generator set SHALL export 100 MW or more net electrical power to the 400 kV g... |
| SUB-REQ-012 | subsystem-requirements | The Remote Handling System SHALL replace all divertor cassettes within a maintenance window of 21 calendar days or less,... |
| SUB-REQ-013 | subsystem-requirements | The Vacuum System SHALL evacuate the plasma vessel from atmospheric pressure to base pressure of 1e-6 Pa or less within ... |
| SUB-REQ-014 | subsystem-requirements | The Radiation Protection System SHALL classify all plant areas into radiation zones (Supervised, Controlled, High Radiat... |
| SUB-REQ-049 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant Isotope Separation System SHALL operate on electrical power supplied at 415 V AC (three-phase) with a ... |
| SUB-REQ-050 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant Isotope Separation System SHALL accept an emergency isolation command from the Plant Protection System... |
| SUB-REQ-051 | subsystem-requirements | The Power Conversion System SHALL be housed in a dedicated turbine hall building with a structural floor load rating of ... |
| SUB-REQ-052 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant SHALL be housed in a dedicated, single-storey Category 1 confinement building constructed to nuclear-g... |
| SUB-REQ-053 | subsystem-requirements | The Cryogenic Plant SHALL be housed in a dedicated plant building with insulated floor area of at least 800 m², minimum ... |
| SUB-REQ-054 | subsystem-requirements | The Vacuum System SHALL comprise physical vacuum equipment mounted on the tokamak support structure, including 12 turbom... |
| SUB-REQ-058 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant SHALL maintain tritium accountancy and confinement functions if any single active component fails, wit... |
| SUB-REQ-059 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant Isotope Separation System SHALL provide a hardwired manual override that, when asserted, shuts down al... |
| SUB-REQ-060 | subsystem-requirements | When any single turbomolecular pump in the Vacuum System Turbomolecular Pump Array fails, the remaining operational pump... |
| SUB-REQ-061 | subsystem-requirements | When the Vacuum System Pressure Monitoring System detects a sensor fault (loss of signal, out-of-range reading, or calib... |
| SUB-REQ-062 | subsystem-requirements | When the Power Conversion System operates at reduced plasma thermal input (Q ≥ 3 but < 5), the PCS SHALL maintain net po... |
| SUB-REQ-063 | subsystem-requirements | When any single Power Conversion System component (steam generator, turbine stage, or condenser circuit) is taken out of... |
| SUB-REQ-064 | subsystem-requirements | When a steam generator tube leak is detected by the Steam Generator and Heat Transfer System (primary-to-secondary press... |
| SUB-REQ-066 | subsystem-requirements | The Vacuum System Pressure Monitoring System SHALL operate from a dedicated UPS-backed 230V AC supply, consuming no more... |
| SUB-REQ-067 | subsystem-requirements | The Cryogenic Plant SHALL incorporate N+1 redundancy for all compressor trains and cold-box modules, such that loss of a... |
| SUB-REQ-068 | subsystem-requirements | The Tritium Plant SHALL implement dual independent confinement barriers on all processing and storage vessels, with auto... |
| SUB-REQ-069 | subsystem-requirements | The Superconducting Magnet System SHALL implement independent quench detection channels on each coil, with a minimum of ... |
| SUB-REQ-070 | subsystem-requirements | The Radiation Protection System SHALL implement engineering ALARA measures at subsystem level: remote handling replaceme... |
| SUB-REQ-071 | subsystem-requirements | Verify REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-117: On the VSPMS integration test bench, switch off the primary 230V AC supply and me... |
| SUB-REQ-072 | subsystem-requirements | Verify REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-118: During Cryogenic Plant Factory Acceptance Test, disable one compressor train and ... |
| SYS-REQ-016 | system-requirements | The STEP Fusion Power Plant SHALL implement radiobiological protection measures such that occupational whole-body dose t... |
| VER-REQ-014 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-006: On a dedicated material injection test bench, fire the massive material injection system with instru... |
| VER-REQ-015 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-004: Inject synchronised calibrated pulses to all diagnostic front-end channels simultaneously from a com... |
| VER-REQ-016 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-003: Inject a simulated primary controller fault (software halt) during closed-loop plasma simulation. Co... |
| VER-REQ-017 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-007: During integrated commissioning at stepped-up fusion power, measure divertor target surface heat flu... |
| VER-REQ-018 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-008: Energise TF coil set to rated current on a coil test facility. Measure on-axis field with calibrated... |
| VER-REQ-019 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-010: During integrated commissioning, process a known tritium inventory through the full CECE detritiatio... |
| VER-REQ-020 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-009: During cold commissioning, operate each cold box train independently at full cryoplant load. Confirm... |
| VER-REQ-021 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-011: During sustained full-power plasma operation at rated Q=5, measure net electrical export at the 400 ... |
| VER-REQ-022 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-012: On a full-scale remote handling test facility with representative port mock-up, demonstrate complete... |
| VER-REQ-023 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-013: After vessel bake-out, measure base pressure in the plasma vessel using calibrated ion gauge and res... |
| VER-REQ-024 | verification-plan | Verify RPS-SUB: On the as-built plant with all shielding installed, measure dose rates at all zone boundaries using cali... |
| VER-REQ-068 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-038: Subject representative RHS in-vessel manipulator samples (identical materials and electronics to fli... |
| VER-REQ-069 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-039: Load a Remote Handling Transfer Cask mock-up with a representative activated blanket module specimen... |
| VER-REQ-070 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-040: On the RHS integration test facility, inject each of five representative fault conditions (loss of p... |
| VER-REQ-071 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-043: During commissioning with live 400 kV grid connection, operate the Power Conversion System at rated ... |
| VER-REQ-072 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-044: During first full-power plasma operation at steady-state Q ≥ 5 burn for ≥30 minutes, instrument the ... |
| VER-REQ-073 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-045: On the Power Conversion System turbine-generator test facility, simulate a plasma disruption signal ... |
| VER-REQ-074 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-001: During integrated commissioning, energise the TF coil set to rated current and measure toroidal fiel... |
| VER-REQ-075 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-002: During cryogenic commissioning, flow helium coolant through the superconducting magnet transfer line... |
| VER-REQ-076 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-003: During fuel injection commissioning using non-tritiated DT-simulant pellets, fire pellet sequences a... |
| VER-REQ-077 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-004: During integrated power operation at fusion power ≥ 500 MW, measure primary coolant flow rate and in... |
| VER-REQ-078 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-005: During plasma operations, inject synthetic diagnostic data into the PCS front-end at 1 MHz and measu... |
| VER-REQ-079 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-006: With the magnet power supply system active, command a step change in poloidal coil current from the ... |
| VER-REQ-080 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-007: Before first plasma operations, evacuate the plasma vessel from atmospheric pressure and measure bas... |
| VER-REQ-081 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-008: During cold acceptance testing, manoeuvre the IVIMM through all horizontal maintenance ports and dem... |
| VER-REQ-082 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-009: During steady-state power operation, measure active power, voltage, frequency, and power factor at t... |
| VER-REQ-083 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-023: During tritium plant commissioning, flow a representative tritium-in-helium mixture (0.1-1% T/He by ... |
| VER-REQ-084 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-049: On the completed ISS installation, measure steady-state power consumption using calibrated three-pha... |
| VER-REQ-085 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-050: Assert the Plant Protection System emergency isolation command to the ISS via the hardwired interfac... |
| VER-REQ-086 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-051: Inspect the as-built turbine hall structure with a certified structural engineer. Confirm floor load... |
| VER-REQ-087 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-052: Conduct structural inspection of the as-built Tritium Plant confinement building. Confirm nuclear-gr... |
| VER-REQ-088 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-053: Inspect the as-built Cryogenic Plant building. Measure insulated floor area using laser measurement ... |
| VER-REQ-089 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-054: During vacuum system pre-commissioning, confirm by physical count and inspection that 12 turbomolecu... |
| VER-REQ-096 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-014: On the as-built plant with all bulk shielding installed, map dose rates at all zone boundary transit... |
| VER-REQ-097 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-037: On the STEP Remote Handling System integration test facility (1:1 scale vessel mockup), conduct a si... |
| VER-REQ-098 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-042: During first D-T power operations at Q>=5 sustained burn, measure the gross-to-net thermal efficienc... |
| VER-REQ-099 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-001: During first D-T plasma campaign, demonstrate sustained plasma burn at Q>=5 for at least one pulse. ... |
| VER-REQ-102 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-003: During the first D-T operating campaign at rated neutron wall loading, measure tritium breeding blan... |
| VER-REQ-103 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-008: During plasma vessel acceptance testing before first plasma, pump down from atmospheric pressure and... |
| VER-REQ-104 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-009: On the Remote Handling System integration facility, with a full-scale mock-up of the divertor casset... |
| VER-REQ-105 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-010: After at least one complete 6-month operating campaign, analyse plant operational records to calcula... |
| VER-REQ-106 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-013: During integrated plant commissioning, enumerate all plasma diagnostic systems installed and commiss... |
| VER-REQ-107 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-014: Using the as-built materials inventory and neutron activation analysis code validated against ITER m... |
| VER-REQ-108 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-015: During first grid synchronisation and power export commissioning, measure voltage, frequency, and to... |
| VER-REQ-109 | verification-plan | Verify SYS-REQ-016: Using the radiation protection design basis documentation (site radiation survey, occupational dose ... |
| VER-REQ-112 | verification-plan | Verify REQ-072: On the vacuum system integration test facility, isolate one turbomolecular pump by closing its gate valv... |
| VER-REQ-113 | verification-plan | Verify REQ-073: On the pressure monitoring system test bench, inject each of three sensor fault types (signal loss, out-... |
| VER-REQ-114 | verification-plan | Verify REQ-074: During first plasma commissioning at Q approximately 3 (partial-load operation), measure net export at 4... |
| VER-REQ-115 | verification-plan | Verify REQ-075: During PCS acceptance testing, isolate one steam generator from the primary and secondary circuits and o... |
| VER-REQ-116 | verification-plan | Verify REQ-076: On a steam generator tube bundle test loop pressurised with helium tracer at primary design pressure, op... |
| VER-REQ-117 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-007: Install calibrated Langmuir-probe array and infrared thermography system on a representative first-w... |
| VER-REQ-118 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-008: At a magnet test facility, energise the full TF coil set to the rated design current. Measure on-axi... |
| VER-REQ-122 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-009: During integrated cryogenics commissioning, energise the full TF and PF coil set to rated current wi... |
| VER-REQ-123 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-010: During Tritium Plant integrated commissioning on a deuterium-tritium representative feed, operate th... |
| VER-REQ-124 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-011: During first-of-kind power generation commissioning at rated fusion power, operate the steam turbine... |
| VER-REQ-125 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-012: On the full-scale Remote Handling test rig in the dedicated remote handling facility, with represent... |
| VER-REQ-126 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-013: During facility commissioning after tokamak assembly, operate the vacuum pumping system from atmosph... |
| VER-REQ-127 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-014: During radiation protection commissioning at rated operation, measure dose rates at all designated z... |
| VER-REQ-128 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-049: During ISS commissioning, apply rated 415 V AC three-phase supply and measure process performance at... |
| VER-REQ-129 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-050: During ISS integrated test, assert the PPS emergency isolation hardwired command at the ISS panel in... |
| VER-REQ-130 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-051: Inspect completed PCS turbine hall building against civil engineering as-built drawings and structur... |
| VER-REQ-131 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-052: Inspect completed Tritium Plant building against nuclear safety case, civil engineering certificate,... |
| VER-REQ-132 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-053: Inspect completed Cryogenic Plant building against as-built drawings, mechanical services schedule, ... |
| VER-REQ-133 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-054: Inspect installed vacuum system equipment layout against as-built drawings. Count installed turbo-mo... |
| VER-REQ-134 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-055: Review structural analysis report for tokamak core assembly, superconducting magnet system, and cryo... |
| VER-REQ-135 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-056: On a representative in-vessel cooling circuit test loop with passive decay heat removal path install... |
| VER-REQ-136 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-057: During plasma operations commissioning, issue an operator-commanded end-of-pulse shutdown from the m... |
| VER-REQ-137 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-058: During Tritium Plant operational qualification, simulate failure of each active accountancy and conf... |
| VER-REQ-138 | verification-plan | Verify SUB-REQ-059: During ISS integrated test, assert the hardwired manual override at the ISS panel interface and conf... |
| VER-REQ-139 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-010: During integrated cryogenics and tritium plant commissioning, operate the LN2 supply interface at ra... |
| VER-REQ-140 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-011: During integrated vacuum-tritium interface commissioning, operate the tritiated exhaust gas transfer... |
| VER-REQ-141 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-012: During plasma control-vacuum system integrated commissioning, inject test pumping speed setpoint com... |
| VER-REQ-142 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-013: During plasma control-tritium plant integrated commissioning, inject test pellet injection rate comm... |
| VER-REQ-143 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-014: During magnet system commissioning at the magnet power supply test facility, energise TF coil set fr... |
| VER-REQ-144 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-015: Inspect all remote handling tools and manipulator end-effectors that operate inside the tritium conf... |
| VER-REQ-145 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-016: During integrated cryogenics-vacuum commissioning, operate the cold head supply interface to vacuum ... |
| VER-REQ-146 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-017: During PCS-RHS interlock commissioning, assert each hardwired interlock signal from the Plasma Contr... |
| VER-REQ-147 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-018: During facility commissioning, measure AC auxiliary power supply at all PCS-to-tokamak auxiliary sup... |
| VER-REQ-148 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-019: During grid connection commissioning, measure imported auxiliary AC power from the National Grid at ... |
| VER-REQ-149 | verification-plan | Verify IFC-REQ-020: During vessel bake-out commissioning, circulate hot nitrogen gas at rated conditions through the tok... |