System Requirements Specification (SyRS) — ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289 — Specification | IEEE 29148 §6.2–6.4
Generated 2026-03-27 — UHT Journal / universalhex.org
| Standard | Title |
|---|---|
| COBALT | — |
| COBALT analysis for one crossing option using published A19 corridor accident data. Compare modelled accident changes against manual calculation using the same link flows and DfT accident rates. Pass criteria | — |
| COBALT link | — |
| COBALT methodology | — |
| COBALT methodology per TAG Unit A4.1 | — |
| DMRB | — |
| DMRB CD 116. The Transport Appraisal System SHALL model NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations at all sensitive receptors within 200m of affected road links using a validated atmospheric dispersion model | — |
| DMRB GG 142 | — |
| DMRB GG 142 Option Identification to narrow long | — |
| DMRB GG 142 and professional practice guidance from CIHT. It mitigates risk of publishing unchecked results that could misrepresent scheme value | — |
| DMRB GG 142 determine count weighting in matrix estimation | — |
| DMRB LA 104 | — |
| DMRB LA 104 Environmental Assessment and Monitoring mandates assessment of 14 environmental topics for major road schemes. Failure to cover all 14 topics would render the environmental statement non | — |
| DMRB LA 104 and Habitats Regulations Assessment screening to determine whether each crossing option triggers formal assessment under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017. The Route and Catchment Analyser SHALL compute multi | — |
| DMRB LA 104 assessment criteria | — |
| DMRB LA 104 assessment topics. Delivering them as structured documents with significance ratings | — |
| DMRB LA 104 environmental assessment. Each component addresses a distinct regulatory domain with different methodologies | — |
| DMRB LA 104 environmental topics | — |
| DMRB LA 104 requires quantified assessment of impacts on statutory designated sites. Intersection area determines direct habitat loss | — |
| DMRB LA 104 topics for EIA compliance. Testing against a representative crossing option confirms the interface delivers complete chapter | — |
| DMRB LA 104 topics. Confirm the Report Template Engine receives structured documents with significance ratings and summary tables. Pass criteria | — |
| DMRB LA 105 and LA 111 require assessment at specific sensitive receptors. The Receptor Mapping Engine must geo | — |
| DMRB LA 105 and LA 111 require receptor | — |
| DMRB LA 105 methodology | — |
| DMRB LA 105. NO2 and PM2.5 are the two pollutants with UK air quality limit values most frequently exceeded near roads. Annual mean concentrations are the metric used for compliance assessment against the Air Quality Strategy objectives and EU limit values retained in UK law. The Transport Appraisal System SHALL calculate noise levels at residential facades within 600m of affected road links using CRTN methodology | — |
| DMRB LA 105. The Air Quality and Noise Modelling Engine SHALL compute LA10 | — |
| DMRB LA 105. Unverified outputs cannot support Environmental Statement conclusions. Verify SUB | — |
| DMRB LA 111 | — |
| DMRB LA 111 and the Environmental Noise Regulations 2006. Noise exposure must be computed at all sensitive receptors to quantify impact magnitude and determine eligibility for noise insulation under the Noise Insulation Regulations 1975. The Greenhouse Gas Assessment Module SHALL quantify lifecycle carbon emissions in tonnes CO2e covering construction | — |
| DMRB LA 111 noise assessment requires sufficient receptor density to characterise noise exposure across the study area. The 500 | — |
| DMRB requirements. Receptor type and sensitivity class drive the applicable noise and air quality criteria used for impact significance assessment. The interface between the Spatial Overlay Processor and the Environmental Impact Assessment Module SHALL transfer constraint matrices as structured tables containing option ID | — |
| DMRB scale | — |
| DMRB standards LA 104 | — |
| Green Book Section 5.4 on model assurance. Recording input datasets | — |
| Green Book and DfT business case guidance | — |
| Green Book declining rate schedule | — |
| Green Book discount rates. Pass criteria | — |
| Green Book discounting and produce present value totals for the TEE table. The interface between the Accident Cost | — |
| Green Book discounting and produce the present value of safety benefits. The interface between the Present Value and Discounting Engine and the BCR and AST Generator SHALL transfer the complete set of discounted present values for all benefit and cost categories | — |
| Green Book discounting rules | — |
| Green Book discounting to all monetary benefit and cost streams over the 60 | — |
| Green Book guidance to enable sensitivity testing across different bias levels. The year | — |
| Green Book mandates optimism bias uplifts for publicly | — |
| Green Book optimism bias uplifts to base cost estimates | — |
| Green Book requires a five | — |
| Green Book rules. TAG unit A3 requires lifecycle greenhouse gas quantification covering construction | — |
| Green Book supplementary guidance Table 1 for the appropriate project stage | — |
| NTEM | — |
| NTEM base trip ends. Verify IFC | — |
| NTEM control total compliance is correctly flagged per zone. Verify IFC | — |
| NTEM growth. NTEM v8.0 provides national | — |
| NTEM regional control totals within 0.1 percent. Pass criteria | — |
| NTEM v8.0 North East regional control totals for each forecast year | — |
| NTEM v8.0 constraining is mandatory per TAG Unit M4 for scheme appraisal to ensure consistency with DfT national forecasts. Local development adjustments are required because the North East LEP area has significant committed developments | — |
| NTEM v8.0 control total compliance flags ensure consistency between local planning data and national forecasts | — |
| NTEM v8.0 control total compliance flags per zone. Trip generation is a function of household composition | — |
| NTEM v8.0 control totals is required by TAG unit M4 for trip end forecasting. Local plan adjustments for committed developments in the three boroughs ensure growth forecasts reflect known development commitments rather than relying solely on national trend projections. The Network and GIS Data Repository SHALL store the coded road network with a minimum of 3 | — |
| NTEM v8.0 provides national trip end forecasts that must be locally adjusted for committed developments with planning permission. Without these adjustments | — |
| NTEM v8.0 regional control totals | — |
| NTEM v8.0 regional control totals within 0.5 | — |
| WebTAG | — |
| WebTAG noise valuation tables mapping change in dB at each receptor to willingness | — |
| WebTAG requires Option Assessment Reports and business cases in prescribed formats. The Report Template Engine centralises document assembly to ensure consistency across appraisal outputs and compliance with DfT submission standards. The Option Comparison Module SHALL produce multi | — |
| WebTAG scale | — |
| WebTAG seven | — |
| WebTAG valuation tables and damage cost values respectively. Receptor | — |
| Acronym | Expansion |
|---|---|
| ARC | Architecture Decisions |
| CCCS | Completeness, Consistency, Correctness, Stability |
| EARS | Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax |
| EIA | Country Planning |
| IFC | Interface Requirements |
| PA | Public Accounts |
| STK | Stakeholder Requirements |
| SUB | Subsystem Requirements |
| SYS | System Requirements |
| TEE | Transport Economic Efficiency |
| UHT | Universal Hex Taxonomy |
| VER | Verification Plan |
| Ref | Requirement | V&V | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| STK-NEEDS-001 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce a WebTAG-compliant economic appraisal demonstrating value for money for each crossing option, suitable for DfT investment decision-making at SOBC, OBC, and FBC stages. Rationale: DfT requires WebTAG-compliant economic appraisal at each business case stage (SOBC/OBC/FBC) as the basis for investment decisions on major transport schemes. Without a compliant BCR calculation, the scheme cannot progress through the DfT approval gateway process. The New Tyne Crossing is expected to cost over 200M GBP, placing it firmly in the Major Scheme category requiring full TAG compliance. | Demonstration | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-002 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL assess environmental impacts of each crossing option in accordance with DMRB LA 104 (Environmental Assessment and Monitoring), LA 105 (Air Quality), LA 111 (Noise and Vibration), and Environment Act 2021 Biodiversity Net Gain requirements. Rationale: Environmental assessment is a statutory requirement for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects under the Planning Act 2008 and EIA Regulations 2017. DMRB standards LA 104/105/111 define the assessment methodology mandated for trunk road and major crossing schemes. Failure to demonstrate BNG compliance under the Environment Act 2021 would block planning consent. | Inspection | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-003 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce public-facing option comparison materials that present economic, environmental, and social impacts in a format accessible to non-specialist audiences. Rationale: The Aarhus Convention and UK planning law require public consultation on major infrastructure proposals. The transport authority must present appraisal findings to statutory consultees and the public in an accessible format to satisfy DCO application requirements and maintain democratic accountability for a scheme affecting over 100000 daily cross-Tyne trips. | Demonstration | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-004 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL evaluate crossing options across all relevant modes including private vehicle, public transport, cycling, and walking, reflecting the transport authority's commitment to sustainable travel. Rationale: DfT Gear Change policy and the North East Transport Plan mandate multimodal assessment for new crossings. The existing Tyne crossings carry significant pedestrian, cycle, and Metro traffic alongside road vehicles. An appraisal limited to highway modes would understate benefits, misrepresent mode shift potential, and fail DfT scrutiny at gateway review. | Analysis | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-005 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL assess distributional impacts of each option across income quintiles, geographic areas, and protected characteristics per Equality Act 2010. Rationale: The Equality Act 2010 requires public authorities to assess distributional impacts of major decisions. TAG Unit A4.2 mandates distributional impact analysis for DfT-funded schemes. Communities either side of the Tyne have significant socioeconomic variation, and failure to assess equity impacts would risk judicial review of the DCO. | Analysis | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-006 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL maintain full audit trail of data sources, model parameters, assumptions, and version history for each appraisal output. Rationale: DfT Analytical Assurance Framework requires that all major scheme appraisals maintain reproducible audit trails. Independent reviewers at gateway stages must be able to verify model inputs, parameters, and assumptions. Without auditability, the appraisal cannot pass DfT quality assurance and the scheme funding case collapses. | Inspection | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-007 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce demand forecasts and economic appraisals for a minimum of three forecast years spanning at least 30 years from scheme opening, with sensitivity tests for high and low growth scenarios. Rationale: TAG Unit M4 requires demand forecasts spanning at least the appraisal period to capture long-term economic benefits and traffic growth uncertainty. A 30-year horizon aligns with the standard 60-year appraisal period discounted to present values. Sensitivity testing for high and low growth is mandated by TAG to demonstrate scheme resilience to demand uncertainty. | Analysis | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-008 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL identify and map all statutory and non-statutory constraints within 500m of each route option corridor, including flood zones, designated ecological sites, listed buildings, scheduled monuments, and contaminated land. Rationale: Planning policy requires identification of all environmental and heritage constraints within the zone of influence of a major crossing. The 500m corridor captures direct construction impacts, visual intrusion, noise propagation, and ecological connectivity effects. Missing a statutory constraint would delay or invalidate the DCO application. | Inspection | stakeholder, session-263 |
| STK-NEEDS-010 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL assess road safety impacts of each crossing option by quantifying changes in accident frequency and severity using COBALT methodology, identifying accident-prone locations within the study area, and demonstrating that the preferred option does not introduce unacceptable safety risks at junctions and merge points. | Analysis | stakeholder, safety, session-275 |
| Ref | Requirement | V&V | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYS-REQS-001 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL compute initial and adjusted Benefit-Cost Ratios for each crossing option using DfT TAG Data Book values of time, vehicle operating costs, and discount rates current at the time of appraisal. Rationale: BCR is the primary value-for-money metric used by DfT to rank and approve major schemes. Using TAG Data Book values of time and vehicle operating costs ensures consistency with national appraisal standards. Both initial BCR (transport user benefits only) and adjusted BCR (including wider economic impacts) are required for the economic case at each gateway stage. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-002 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL implement a variable demand model with elastic response to generalised cost changes, incorporating mode choice between car, bus, Metro, rail, cycling, and walking. Rationale: A fixed-demand model would overestimate benefits for a crossing that changes generalised cost significantly. Variable demand with elastic response captures induced traffic, mode shift, and trip redistribution. The Tyne corridor has six competing modes and elastic responses are material: Metro ridership and Shields Ferry usage are directly sensitive to new road crossing provision. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-003 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL model traffic operations at all junctions within 2km of each crossing option using microsimulation with a minimum 1-second time step, producing queue length, delay, and level of service metrics per junction arm for AM peak (0800-0900), interpeak (1000-1600), and PM peak (1700-1800) periods. Rationale: The 2km junction influence area captures the traffic redistribution and rat-running effects of a new crossing. Microsimulation at 1-second time steps is required for accurate queue and delay modelling at signal-controlled junctions where platoon dispersion matters. AM/interpeak/PM periods cover the three distinct demand patterns that drive junction capacity assessment per DMRB CD 116. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-004 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL model NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations at all sensitive receptors within 200m of affected road links using a validated atmospheric dispersion model, with outputs expressed as annual mean concentrations for comparison against Air Quality Strategy objectives. Rationale: Air quality assessment at sensitive receptors within 200m of affected links is mandated by DMRB LA 105. NO2 and PM2.5 are the two pollutants with UK air quality limit values most frequently exceeded near roads. Annual mean concentrations are the metric used for compliance assessment against the Air Quality Strategy objectives and EU limit values retained in UK law. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-005 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL calculate noise levels at residential facades within 600m of affected road links using CRTN methodology, producing LA10,18h for daytime and Lnight for night-time assessment, with results mapped to Noise Important Areas. Rationale: CRTN methodology is the UK statutory method for road traffic noise assessment. The 600m study area captures the zone where road traffic noise from a major crossing exceeds background levels. LA10,18h is the daytime noise index used in UK noise policy and Lnight is required under the Environmental Noise Directive. Noise Important Areas are Defra-designated locations where noise action is prioritised. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-006 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL calculate Biodiversity Net Gain using the DEFRA Biodiversity Metric for each crossing option, demonstrating a minimum 10% net gain as required by the Environment Act 2021. Rationale: The Environment Act 2021 mandates a minimum 10 percent Biodiversity Net Gain for all Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects. The DEFRA Biodiversity Metric is the mandated calculation tool. Failure to demonstrate BNG compliance would prevent DCO consent. The crossing corridor includes Tyne riverside habitats that require careful BNG calculation. | Analysis | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-007 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL generate Appraisal Summary Tables per TAG Unit A1 for each crossing option, consolidating economy, environment, social, and public accounts impacts into a standardised seven-point assessment scale. Rationale: TAG Unit A1 defines the Appraisal Summary Table as the standard format for presenting scheme impacts to DfT decision-makers. The seven-point scale (large beneficial to large adverse) enables consistent comparison across options and against other schemes in the national pipeline. ASTs are a mandatory deliverable for SOBC, OBC, and FBC submissions. | Demonstration | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-008 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce distributional impact analysis tables showing user benefits and disbenefits disaggregated by income quintile, LSOA geography, age group, disability status, and ethnicity for each crossing option. Rationale: TAG Unit A4.2 requires disaggregation of user benefits by income quintile, geography, and protected characteristics. The Tyne corridor spans areas ranging from IMD decile 1 (most deprived, parts of South Shields and Wallsend) to decile 9 (Jesmond, Gosforth). Without distributional analysis, the appraisal would mask regressive impacts on deprived communities. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-009 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL record the source, version, date of extraction, and any transformations applied to every dataset used in the appraisal, such that an independent reviewer can reproduce any intermediate or final result. Rationale: DfT Analytical Assurance Framework requires complete data provenance for independent reproducibility. Every dataset used in the appraisal must be traceable to source, version, and extraction date. Without this, the appraisal fails DfT quality assurance at gateway review, and any challenged outputs cannot be defended at public inquiry. | Inspection | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-010 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce demand forecasts for opening year, design year (opening + 15 years), and a long-term horizon (opening + 30 years), with core, high growth (+20%), and low growth (-20%) sensitivity tests for each. Rationale: TAG Unit M4 requires demand forecasts at opening year, a design year 15 years after opening, and a long-term horizon. The plus-or-minus 20 percent sensitivity tests bracket the range of plausible traffic growth given uncertainty in economic growth, remote working trends, and EV adoption rates. These are standard TAG sensitivity ranges for major schemes. | Test | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-011 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL maintain a geospatial constraint database covering flood zones (EA Flood Map for Planning), designated ecological sites (SSSI, SAC, SPA, Ramsar, LWS), heritage assets (listed buildings, scheduled monuments, conservation areas, registered parks), and contaminated land registers for all route option corridors. Rationale: A geospatial constraint database is essential for route option sifting and environmental impact assessment. The Tyne corridor contains Environment Agency flood zone 2 and 3 areas, SSSIs at Jarrow Slake and the Tyne estuary, Grade I and II listed structures, and legacy industrial contamination. Missing any statutory constraint would invalidate the environmental chapter of the DCO application. | Inspection | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-012 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL calculate lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions for each crossing option using TAG Unit A3 methodology, including construction-phase embodied carbon, operational carbon from changed traffic patterns, and a monetised carbon cost using BEIS traded and non-traded carbon values. Rationale: TAG Unit A3 mandates lifecycle greenhouse gas assessment for major schemes. Construction-phase embodied carbon is significant for a river crossing involving substantial concrete and steel. Operational carbon from traffic redistribution captures the net effect on vehicle-km. Monetisation using BEIS carbon values enables inclusion in the BCR and economic case. | Analysis | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-013 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL produce five-case business case documentation (strategic, economic, commercial, financial, management cases) per HM Treasury Green Book and DfT business case guidance, with outputs structured for SOBC, OBC, and FBC submission formats. Rationale: HM Treasury Green Book requires a five-case business case for all public spending above the delegated limit. DfT business case guidance specifies the structure for SOBC, OBC, and FBC submissions. The five cases ensure strategic fit, value for money, commercial viability, financial affordability, and deliverability are each assessed. Without five-case documentation, the scheme cannot secure Treasury approval. | Demonstration | system, session-263 |
| SYS-REQS-015 | The Transport Appraisal System SHALL calculate the change in personal injury accidents by severity (fatal, serious, slight) for each crossing option using COBALT link-based accident analysis, applying DfT-published accident rates and monetising safety benefits using current-year accident cost values per TAG Unit A4.1. | Analysis | system, safety, session-275 |
| Source | Target | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STK-009 | SYS-014 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-003 | SYS-REQS-013 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-001 | SYS-REQS-013 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-002 | SYS-REQS-012 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-008 | SYS-REQS-011 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-007 | SYS-REQS-010 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-006 | SYS-REQS-009 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-005 | SYS-REQS-008 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-003 | SYS-REQS-007 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-002 | SYS-REQS-006 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-002 | SYS-REQS-005 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-002 | SYS-REQS-004 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-001 | SYS-REQS-003 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-004 | SYS-REQS-002 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-001 | SYS-REQS-002 | derives | |
| STK-NEEDS-001 | SYS-REQS-001 | derives |