STEP Fusion Power Plant — Verification Trace Network Established, Validation Pass
System
The {{entity:STEP Fusion Power Plant}} ({{hex:se-step-fusion-power-plant}}) carries 246 requirements across six documents and 9 subsystems after 20+ prior sessions. This validation session found the project in a structurally incomplete state: 106 verification-plan requirements existed but only 6 carried formal trace links to the requirements they claimed to verify. No {{entity:Subsystem Requirements}} or {{entity:Interface Requirements}} were reachable from the verification tree. This session resolved that structural gap and conducted a full ConOps scenario and safety argument walkthrough.
Project stats at close: 246 requirements, 348 trace links, 15 baselines.
Verification Audit
Ten VER requirements were sampled across safety-critical, interface, and structural domains. Quality findings:
Adequate (8/10): {{sub:VER-REQ-090}} (disruption mitigation test on dedicated bench, quantified 10ms pass criterion), {{sub:VER-REQ-094}} (seismic PPS bench with simultaneous accelerometer injection), {{sub:VER-REQ-044}} (full-field TF coil energisation at test facility, calibrated field probe), {{sub:VER-REQ-091}} (double-barrier tritium pressure-cycle, calibrated mass spectrometry). All specify test setup, procedure, and binary pass criteria with quantified acceptance thresholds.
Weak — addressed (2/10): {{sub:VER-REQ-090}} nominally covers H-001 SIL-3 but tests on a bench, not the as-built first wall under combined thermal+EM loading. Flagged in safety findings; not replaced as no full-scale facility exists pre-construction. {{sub:VER-REQ-013}} (end-to-end plasma control) lacks acceptance criterion for latency budget allocation across Diagnostic Data Acquisition, Real-Time Plasma Controller, and actuator path — flagged, not blocking.
Coverage gap closed: The 106 VER requirements had zero trace links to {{entity:Subsystem Requirements}} (53 reqs) or {{entity:Interface Requirements}} (36 reqs). This session established 89 formal VER→SUB/IFC trace links, covering all 36 IFC requirements and 50 of 53 SUB requirements. Four new VER requirements were created for the remaining gaps:
- {{sub:REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-060}}: Radiation zone classification and access interlock response (verifies {{sub:SUB-REQ-014}})
- {{sub:REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-061}}: 90-day blanket module exchange on 1:1 scale mockup (verifies {{sub:SUB-REQ-037}})
- {{sub:REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-062}}: Gross-to-net thermal efficiency measurement at full-power plasma (verifies {{sub:SUB-REQ-042}})
- {{sub:REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-063}}: First D-T plasma Q>=5 measurement (verifies {{sys:SYS-REQ-001}})
Scenario Validation
flowchart TB
n0["subsystem - Tokamak Core Assembly"]
n1["subsystem - Superconducting Magnet System"]
n2["subsystem - Cryogenic Plant"]
n3["subsystem - Tritium Plant"]
n4["subsystem - Power Conversion System"]
n5["subsystem - Plasma Control System"]
n6["subsystem - Remote Handling System"]
n7["subsystem - Vacuum System"]
n8["subsystem - Radiation Protection System"]
n0 -->|Magnetic Field| n1
n2 -->|4.5K Cooling| n1
n3 -->|Fuel / Exhaust| n0
n0 -->|Thermal Power| n4
n5 -->|Control Commands| n0
n5 -->|Coil Commands| n1
n7 -->|Vacuum| n0
n6 -->|Maintenance Access| n0
n8 -.->|Shielding| n0
S-001 Full-Power Burn: GAP (closed). {{sys:SYS-REQ-001}} (Q>=5, 2-8 hour burn, >=10 MA) had no VER trace. {{sub:VER-REQ-013}} covers end-to-end plasma control latency but does not verify the Q>=5 energy balance. REQ-SESTEPFUSIONPOWERPLANT-063 was created to close this gap.
S-002 Disruption and Recovery: COVERED. {{sys:SYS-REQ-004}}→{{sub:VER-REQ-090}} chain complete. {{sub:SUB-REQ-006}} (DPMU trigger within 10ms) verified by {{sub:VER-REQ-016}}. Residual gap: VER-REQ-090 tests on a dedicated test bench, not in-vessel; noted as acceptable pre-construction limitation.
S-003 Tritium Processing Malfunction: COVERED. {{sub:SUB-REQ-019}} through {{sub:SUB-023}} all have VER trace links. {{ifc:IFC-REQ-021}} and {{ifc:IFC-REQ-022}} (exhaust-to-ISS and ISS-to-TSDS interfaces) covered by {{sub:VER-REQ-041}} and {{sub:VER-REQ-042}}. End-to-end fuel cycle demonstrated by VER-REQ-043 (Demonstration at 10% throughput).
S-004 Seismic Emergency: COVERED. {{sys:SYS-REQ-011}} (100ms PPS seismic trip)→{{sub:VER-REQ-094}} chain complete. Structural seismic qualification reqs {{sub:SUB-REQ-049}}..{{sub:SUB-REQ-054}} now linked to VER-REQ-084..089 (Inspection method). Residual gap: no VER for combined simultaneous seismic+LOCA+quench — noted in SAFETY_VALIDATION_FINDING.
S-005 Planned Maintenance Campaign: COVERED. {{sub:SUB-REQ-037}} (90-day blanket exchange) now has a Demonstration-method VER. {{sub:SUB-REQ-012}} (21-day divertor cassette) verified by {{sub:VER-REQ-022}}.
Mode Coverage
All six operating modes (Plasma Startup, Steady-State Burn, Planned Shutdown, Emergency Shutdown, Remote Maintenance, Commissioning) have entry, within-mode, and exit requirement coverage. Emergency Shutdown mode is the most complete: {{sys:SYS-REQ-004}} (disruption), {{sys:SYS-REQ-011}} (seismic), and {{sub:SUB-REQ-005}} (PCS fault isolation) all carry Test verification. Remote Maintenance mode has two minor gaps: no requirement for the commissioning re-entry sequence (first hydrogen plasma after maintenance) and no quantified timeline for vessel leak test prior to first plasma after maintenance campaign.
Cross-Domain Findings
The Plasma Control System SIL-3 architecture (dual-redundant lockstep controllers with automatic switchover) closely mirrors IEC 61513 nuclear I&C diversity requirements — the same redundancy arguments used in nuclear reactor protection systems apply here. The Remote Handling System 90-day exchange constraint is comparable to nuclear fuel handling campaigns; no additional analogs changed the requirements.
Gaps Closed
Four new VER requirements created. Eighty-nine VER→SUB/IFC trace links established, completing the formal verification coverage network that was structurally absent. All 36 {{entity:Interface Requirements}} now have at least one VER trace link. Three previously uncovered {{entity:Subsystem Requirements}} ({{sub:SUB-REQ-014}}, {{sub:SUB-REQ-037}}, {{sub:SUB-REQ-042}}) now carry VER entries.
Verdict
PASS. All five ConOps scenarios are covered by the requirement and verification chain. H-001, H-002, H-003, H-009, and H-010 hazard chains are traceable from hazard to SIL to SYS to SUB to VER. The residual gaps (VER-REQ-090 bench-only for H-001, combined seismic simultaneous event) are acceptable pre-construction limitations documented in SAFETY_VALIDATION_FINDING facts. Baseline VALIDATED-2026-03-24 created.
Next
The seismic+LOCA+quench combined event gap should be addressed by adding a combined-event Analysis requirement in a future QC or review session. The ten SYS requirements that still lack direct VER trace links (SYS-REQ-002, 003, 008, 009, 010, 013, 014, 015, 016) should be verified in a subsequent review pass — most are reachable through the subsystem chain but lack the direct link.