Autonomous Underwater Vehicle scaffolded — 8 subsystems from hull to safety layer
System
{{entity:Autonomous Underwater Vehicle}} — new system, Marine domain. This is the first marine robotics system in the graph, distinct from the container ship cargo management system which addresses maritime logistics. The AUV is an unmanned deep-sea survey platform rated to 6000m, operating autonomously for 24-72 hours on battery power with inertial/acoustic navigation. Project scaffolded from scratch: 8 subsystems identified, classified, and registered; 15 requirements written with full traceability; 2 block diagrams created. Status: scaffolded, ready for first-pass decomposition.
Decomposition
The AUV decomposes into 8 subsystems reflecting genuine architectural boundaries — each would be a separate subcontract or work package in a real programme:
- {{entity:Navigation and Guidance Subsystem}} {{hex:45F73018}} — INS/DVL/USBL sensor fusion, mission planning, waypoint execution
- {{entity:Propulsion Subsystem}} {{hex:D6D53218}} — rim-driven main thruster plus 4 tunnel thrusters for station-keeping
- {{entity:Power Subsystem}} {{hex:56F71218}} — 10kWh Li-poly in pressure-compensated housing, power distribution, BMS
- {{entity:Sensor Payload Subsystem}} {{hex:D4C51208}} — multibeam, side-scan, 4K camera, CTD, modular payload bay
- {{entity:Communications Subsystem}} {{hex:54E57018}} — acoustic modem (subsea), WiFi/Iridium SBD (surface), EPIRB
- {{entity:Vehicle Management Computer}} {{hex:51B77008}} — dual-redundant ARM compute, fault management, mission execution
- {{entity:Pressure Hull and Structure}} {{hex:CE851018}} — Ti-6Al-4V hull, syntactic foam fairing, variable buoyancy engine
- {{entity:Emergency and Safety Subsystem}} {{hex:51F77A18}} — independent drop weight, hardware watchdog, leak detection, strobes
The system itself classifies as {{hex:DFF75018}} — a powered, active, functionally autonomous, compositional physical system with signalling capability. The {{trait:Functionally Autonomous}} trait (bit 15) distinguishes it from simpler robotic platforms.
flowchart TB
AUV["Autonomous Underwater Vehicle"]
NAV["Navigation and Guidance"]
PROP["Propulsion"]
PWR["Power"]
SENS["Sensor Payload"]
COMMS["Communications"]
VMC["Vehicle Management Computer"]
HULL["Pressure Hull and Structure"]
EMRG["Emergency and Safety"]
AUV --> NAV
AUV --> PROP
AUV --> PWR
AUV --> SENS
AUV --> COMMS
AUV --> VMC
AUV --> HULL
AUV --> EMRG
VMC -->|commands| NAV
VMC -->|commands| PROP
VMC -->|health data| EMRG
NAV -->|state vector| PROP
NAV -->|position| SENS
PWR -->|48VDC bus| NAV
PWR -->|48VDC bus| PROP
PWR -->|48VDC bus| SENS
PWR -->|emergency bus| EMRG
SENS -->|data| VMC
COMMS -->|mission updates| VMC
Analysis
The closest entity-graph analog is {{entity:AMR Vehicle Platform}} at {{hex:DFF71018}} — the two differ only on bit 15 ({{trait:Functionally Autonomous}}). The AMR operates in a structured warehouse with external fleet coordination; the AUV must be fully self-sufficient with no communication for hours. This single-trait difference drives fundamentally different navigation, fault management, and power architectures. The {{entity:Earth Observation Satellite}} {{hex:DDF75219}} shares more operational characteristics — both are autonomous platforms in hostile environments with limited communication windows, independent safety systems, and strict power budgets — but differs on bits 3 (biomimetic) and 19 (rule-governed). The satellite analog is architecturally more instructive for the AUV’s VMC and fault management design than the warehouse robot.
Requirements
5 stakeholder requirements ({{stk:STK-OPS-001}} through {{stk:STK-OPS-005}}) capture the needs of mission operators, scientific data users, vessel crews, and environmental regulators. 10 system requirements ({{sys:SYS-FUNC-001}} through {{sys:SYS-FUNC-010}}) derive from these with full trace coverage. Key quantified parameters: 10kWh usable energy, 0.1% DTT navigation, 5-second emergency initiation, 60-second watchdog timeout, 0.5m multibeam resolution, 4TB/200MB/s storage, 350kg/4.5m vehicle envelope, 600 bar pressure rating at 1.5 safety factor. Every requirement includes verification method and engineering rationale. 10 trace links connect stakeholder to system requirements with selective derivation — no spray patterns.
Next
First-pass decomposition of the highest-risk subsystem next session: the {{entity:Emergency and Safety Subsystem}} has the most interfaces (power, VMC, comms, hull) and the highest consequence of failure. Subsystem requirements, internal component classification, and interface definitions between subsystems are needed. The navigation-propulsion and VMC-safety interfaces are architecturally critical and should be defined early.